Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, shep said:

I had high hopes for MVJ and J Johnson

when mvj is out there i watch and see what he does...agreed not much there.

not sure if it's bc they have 3 names but i thought he could be a little like ZBJ from a few years ago...end rusher that made some noise in the qb's head!!!!

Posted
48 minutes ago, forksandspoons said:

I watched the highlights again and noticed on a lot of big plays ACU had, our DB simply fell on his own. Anyone else notice that? Was the turf an issue? haha 

Bubba referenced that in his weekly press conference. Said that was hopefully just a random issue that won’t reoccur. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

Oh it can always get worse. Not sure something as simple as alignment is going to fix the issues 8 games into the season. 

So if you were the coach what would you do? Your only go-to is to fire the coaches and recruit a completely new roster.... but you never actually say what would work or make the team better besides that. So please enlighten me on what you would do to help our defense...

Posted
On 10/30/2022 at 9:19 PM, Sioux94 said:

Normally my favorite uniform is the traditional green jersey with white pants. But I forgot how much I don't like those new green tops with the dumb white on the shoulders.  I think our black jerseys are our best ones now at this point. 

Game was far from perfect, but a win is a win.  

This flavor of green jerseys with the white shoulders is hideous. Keep wearing the black ones until they get better green ones.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, HoopsFan03 said:

So if you were the coach what would you do? Your only go-to is to fire the coaches and recruit a completely new roster.... but you never actually say what would work or make the team better besides that. So please enlighten me on what you would do to help our defense...

We need to put our defenders in a position to make plays.  If we're going to run an aggressive 3-4 scheme where we will be disguising blitzes and bringing pressure on most down/distances, then we need to make sure we have the guys in place to get home, otherwise you're putting a ton of pressure on your back 4 to hold up.  This year we don't seem to have the ability to get home on the pass rush like we have in the past, and I'm sure it's contributing to our issues in pass defense (disclaimer:  I am not an esteemed football mind).  Is that Xs and Os or Jimmy's and Joe's?  I'm not sure.

This is just an opinion, so take it for what it's worth.  In my view, to run a 3-4 scheme effectively, you need a stud NG to command a double team and very good linebackers to step into the hole and make plays.  I tend to believe that really good NGs are very hard to find/develop, and our linebacking play has taken a step back in some regards (sacks).  I'd prefer to be a 4-3 defense at this point, because I believe it's easier to recruit players to...but again that's just my opinion.  If we can't find the personnel to run this defense effectively, then I think we need to change it up.

Posted
17 minutes ago, UND08 said:

We need to put our defenders in a position to make plays.  If we're going to run an aggressive 3-4 scheme where we will be disguising blitzes and bringing pressure on most down/distances, then we need to make sure we have the guys in place to get home, otherwise you're putting a ton of pressure on your back 4 to hold up.  This year we don't seem to have the ability to get home on the pass rush like we have in the past, and I'm sure it's contributing to our issues in pass defense (disclaimer:  I am not an esteemed football mind).  Is that Xs and Os or Jimmy's and Joe's?  I'm not sure.

This is just an opinion, so take it for what it's worth.  In my view, to run a 3-4 scheme effectively, you need a stud NG to command a double team and very good linebackers to step into the hole and make plays.  I tend to believe that really good NGs are very hard to find/develop, and our linebacking play has taken a step back in some regards (sacks).  I'd prefer to be a 4-3 defense at this point, because I believe it's easier to recruit players to...but again that's just my opinion.  If we can't find the personnel to run this defense effectively, then I think we need to change it up.

Been saying they need to switch to this for years. The 3-4 has hurt us more than it's helped us IMO. If the 3-4 defense was so good every team would be using it. To be honest I can't even name another team the uses the scheme??

Posted
19 minutes ago, GoHawks said:

Been saying they need to switch to this for years. The 3-4 has hurt us more than it's helped us IMO. If the 3-4 defense was so good every team would be using it. To be honest I can't even name another team the uses the scheme??

Alabama

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GoHawks said:

Been saying they need to switch to this for years. The 3-4 has hurt us more than it's helped us IMO. If the 3-4 defense was so good every team would be using it. To be honest I can't even name another team the uses the scheme??

Vikings

Posted
5 hours ago, HoopsFan03 said:

So if you were the coach what would you do? Your only go-to is to fire the coaches and recruit a completely new roster.... but you never actually say what would work or make the team better besides that. So please enlighten me on what you would do to help our defense...

Wrong. My only “go to“ is not to fire all the coaches or recruit a whole new roster.  Could different coaches with better players do better? Sure, definitely possible, but that costs money. UND is too tight for that at this juncture.

UND needs to look at their rotation. They need to see if there are any players that should be playing more or less. That’s a starting point. They need to take away the opposing teams best player- focus the game plan on that. They need to play more base defense, even if that’s against Bubba’s MO, and focus on a competent shell. That means running more cover 4 and two man under. Give the corners help and make opposing teams earn it. Don’t give up big plays on blown assignments, especially against ISU and USD; if you make those teams try and earn it, they’ll likely falter and turn it over or make a mistake. That’s why their record is 1-7 and 2-6, respectively. Don’t gift their offenses with cover zero blitzes that put our undersized, inexperienced DBs on an island. UND has one player in their secondary that can’t cover to save his life but yet he’s out there snap in and snap out. Senior leadership, I’m told, is why he’s playing even though can’t cover worth a damn. 
 

But just my 2 cents. You also could go completely opposite and blitz the hell out of ISU and USD and it could work, but I wouldn’t do that. 

 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
3 hours ago, streetsahead said:

This flavor of green jerseys with the white shoulders is hideous. Keep wearing the black ones until they get better green ones.

respectfully disagree on them being that bad, But they definitely could be way better. Adidas needs to send them new ones next season as far as I’m concerned.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, UND08 said:

We need to put our defenders in a position to make plays.  If we're going to run an aggressive 3-4 scheme where we will be disguising blitzes and bringing pressure on most down/distances, then we need to make sure we have the guys in place to get home, otherwise you're putting a ton of pressure on your back 4 to hold up.  This year we don't seem to have the ability to get home on the pass rush like we have in the past, and I'm sure it's contributing to our issues in pass defense (disclaimer:  I am not an esteemed football mind).  Is that Xs and Os or Jimmy's and Joe's?  I'm not sure.

This is just an opinion, so take it for what it's worth.  In my view, to run a 3-4 scheme effectively, you need a stud NG to command a double team and very good linebackers to step into the hole and make plays.  I tend to believe that really good NGs are very hard to find/develop, and our linebacking play has taken a step back in some regards (sacks).  I'd prefer to be a 4-3 defense at this point, because I believe it's easier to recruit players to...but again that's just my opinion.  If we can't find the personnel to run this defense effectively, then I think we need to change it up.

Although I understand where you’re coming from, noseguards (NG) are going the way of the fullback … extinct. Majority of defense ran is nickel - there’s no NG even on the field. With the 3-4, you need a couple 5-technique defensive ends that can squeeze down in nickel, which eliminates the NG for the majority of the snaps. 
 

BUT, as @geaux_sioux has mentioned previously, UND had failed to recruit effectively at the 5 technique defensive end spot. They have some players that fit that body type, but not enough. Several are too small and more fit the mold of a 4-3 defensive end. This hurts UND in short yardage and also hurts them in nickel as they lose the ability to still play interior run defense.

With that said, I’m fine with the 3-4, just need better players. UND is not generating a good enough pass rush with their outside backers. It’s been a disappointment with two of the most important positions in any defense: pass rushers and defensive backs.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, UND Football Fan said:

With spread teams, many 3-4 teams run lots nickel defense to deal with spread offenses. 

That’s all defense. Regardless of the front, nickel is the package on the field the majority of the time. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

That’s all defense. Regardless of the front, nickel is the package on the field the majority of the time. 

Yes, that’s we need we need more NG types (not just 2) that can play. So we don’t have issues in stopping spread run and can force more one on one with our edge rushers. I’m a novice and probably next year (hopefully) we will improve. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, UND Football Fan said:

Yes, that’s we need we need more NG types (not just 2) that can play. So we don’t have issues in stopping spread run and can force more one on one with our edge rushers. I’m a novice and probably next year (hopefully) we will improve. 

 

 

Yep, need a different body type at 5 technique.  
 

But again, UND’s pass rushers and defensive backs aren’t producing enough. 

Not enough strip-sacks and interceptions this season.  Not nearly enough. 

Partially due to scheme, but more so players. Haven’t been able to replace players lost from 2021 teams. 
 

It’s not the Xs and the Os, but the Jimmys and the Joes. 

Posted

Why can’t we recruit the big D linemen but other schools in this conference have a ton of them? Too cold? Not sold on the 3-4? I don’t get it. 
 

our D line has been pretty good against most teams this year but not against the elite o lines 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...