cfm567b27 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Lucia has never had a formidable backup at Minnesota. Somehow he's coped. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Skippy - looks like brianvf answered your question effectively didn't he. Now for the next math lesson.... Quote
TC_transplant Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Skippy - looks like brianvf answered your question effectively didn't he. Now for the next math lesson.... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actually he didn't. With a winning percentage of 64.3 percent, if he played the same number of games that Briggs has played (12), he would have a record of 7-4-1. 83.3% > 64.3% Quote
cfm567b27 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 S-L-O-W-L-Y for those impaired - Winning percentage= wins/number of games Quote
cfm567b27 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Skippy - You just can't get enough of the Sioux can you? You seem to lurk on here all day long day in and day out. I understand your fetish - gotta hang around with winners. Quote
dagies Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 There is a history that Minnesota tends to choke in the playoffs. All they need is a motivating speech from Woog and its over. I think you hint at why this probably doesn't apply any more. Quote
TC_transplant Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 S-L-O-W-L-Y for those impaired - Winning percentage= wins/number of games <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Lammy wins 64.3 percent of his starts. If he made the same number of starts as Briggs, he would be 7-4-1. Quote
#1siouxfan22 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Philippe Lamoureux Fr, UND 7 4-2-1 422:46 13 175 .931 1.84 Kellen Briggs So, UMN 12 10-2-0 720:48 23 316 .932 1.91 Phil wins Quote
TC_transplant Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Philippe Lamoureux Fr, UND 7 4-2-1 422:46 13 175 .931 1.84 Kellen Briggs So, UMN 12 10-2-0 720:48 23 316 .932 1.91 Phil wins <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 64.3 percent of the time. I get it. Quote
State Of Hockey Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Only the Sue would have have a damn Frenchie as their goalie. No freedom fries for you guys. Quote
cfm567b27 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Only the Sue would have have a damn Frenchie as their goalie. No freedom fries for you guys. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> How do you manage to post between homeroom and 1st period algebra? You must have wireless access? Quote
The Sicatoka Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Anyone have a stamp? I need to mail the "Congratulations on being #1 in an ends-in-"r"-month!" card back to Don Lucia and company, along with a "Virg Foss Award" self-nomination form. It's called "re-gift-ing!" Quote
DAR Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Only the Sue would have have a damn Frenchie as their goalie. No freedom fries for you guys. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hmmm... funny the Goofers recruited him heavily. Funny how all the punks come out when the Goofs have a good weekend. Quote
State Of Hockey Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 How do you manage to post between homeroom and 1st period algebra? You must have wireless access? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> How do you manage to get girls to talk to you when the Beamer is in the shop? Quote
TC_transplant Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 How do you manage to post between homeroom and 1st period algebra? You must have wireless access? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Who has first period algebra at 3:45 p.m.? Quote
schmidtdoggydog Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 64.3 percent of the time. I get it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Stop comparing apples and oranges. There is a considerable difference between one's freshmen and sophomore seasons at any position in college hockey. Briggs as a freshmen won 25 of the 40 games he appeared in, which provides a comparable win % to PL's, (comparing 40 games played to 7 notwithstanding). His GAA was 2.62 and save % was .894 and he was the goalie on what was generally regarded as the top team in the country at the beginning of the year yet didn't lead his team to the Frozen Four. As of this point, not really a whole lot to brag about other than some early season success this year, which gets you little or nothing. Quote
GDM Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Get on topic and end the personal attacks. GDM Forums Moderator SiouxSports.com Quote
cfm567b27 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Skippy and POS err SOH win Sioux fan of the week for their post count on SS exceeding all others. Nice of you two clowns to take such interest in the premier hockey program in the country. Quote
cfm567b27 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Get on topic and end the personal attacks. GDM Forums Moderator SiouxSports.com <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Might want to hit the "ban" button twice ..... Quote
DAR Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Who has first period algebra at 3:45 p.m.? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> A loser like state of hockey would, since he is probably just getting his lazy ass out of bed. Quote
TC_transplant Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 Stop comparing apples and oranges. There is a considerable difference between one's freshmen and sophomore seasons at any position in college hockey. Briggs as a freshmen won 25 of the 40 games he appeared in, which provides a comparable win % to PL's, (comparing 40 games played to 7 notwithstanding). His GAA was 2.62 and save % was .894 and he was the goalie on what was generally regarded as the top team in the country at the beginning of the year yet didn't lead his team to the Frozen Four. As of this point, not really a whole lot to brag about other than some early season success this year, which gets you little or nothing. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Umm...someone said Lammy had better stats than Briggs and I pointed out that was a false statement. I'm sorry if facts are misconstrued as bragging. Quote
Csonked Out Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 something else to mention is goals scored, UND is average about 2.25 goals again(went up after michigan tech). I will agree that briggs is having a good year, his numbers are showing it. But for the offense phil has been getting in his starts, his numbers are just that much more impressive. If i had to chose a goalie, it would be without question phil. Also it depends on what numbers, win % is something that a goalie does not have complete control over. If the offense can't put the puck in the net, it doesn't matter if the goalie has a save %of 95%, he still wouldn't win. That being said, both goalies are having a great year, so why are we even discussing this? Quote
State Of Hockey Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 A loser like state of hockey would, since he is probably just getting his lazy ass out of bed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Stop the personal attacks man. I've been up for at least two hours looking for 86 BMW's on the web with 300,000 miles. Quote
State Of Hockey Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 something else to mention is goals scored, UND is average about 2.25 goals again(went up after michigan tech). I will agree that briggs is having a good year, his numbers are showing it. But for the offense phil has been getting in his starts, his numbers are just that much more impressive. If i had to chose a goalie, it would be without question phil. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I would choose Frazee over both of them. Quote
PCM Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 I have no choice but to break out the bad dog graphic. Quote
cfm567b27 Posted November 29, 2004 Posted November 29, 2004 I have no choice but to break out the bad dog graphic. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wondering what took you so long Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.