iluvdebbies

Other than his defensive lapse on the second goal....how do you keep him out.

I don't think anybody is suggesting that Kristo will have a long career in the NHL simply because he is leading the Hartford Wolfpack in scoring. Most would just like to see him get a chance. It's not uncommon for a player to get a call up because he is leading his team in scoring, especially on team looking for offense like the Rangers have most of the season.

Four games.(Northern Michigan series)

Do we know which one happened first?

sports.yahoo.com/...puck-daddy/makes-canada-olympic-hockey...Is this the article you're talking about? If so JT is listed here. edit: I see the omission now....hard to figure that one out!

Yep ....I heard It too....they cited the good ol' boy network as their source.

Felix Girard was the final cut for team Canada.

Was it the guy in the mirror?

....or Phil Housley!

Hey Goon....off topic, but when are you going to make easy to comment on your blog?

Really? I've always heard that. Tried them at the game Sat.....wasn't real impressed.... didn't even finish them..... too much hype maybe.

The misconduct and unsportsmanlike conduct penalty were in the second period,,,,,,the roughing penalty was at 19:25 of the third period.

If you put my avatar next to a picture of Dave Starman-REALLY scary. Welcome to hockey!

What's all the discussion about anyway. They got the call right. The NMU players feet were in the crease and visually impaired Zane. At worst they got it wrong and a call went our way. Which the cry on here is that NEVER happens with Don Adams crews.......NEVER....we are always getting screwed by the officials . Enjoy it .....it may NEVER happen again

I knew it was going to be a no goal when after the first replay Hammer said...."that's clearly a goal Kober"

19

Good point....they passed on UND's bid for the women!

THIS is just one of the reasons why I hate shootouts!

This time you are wrong

That even makes less sense.

Again, the four penalties .....two on each team cancelled out. BUT each player has to still serve the time they racked up.

Has nothing to do with number of people in the box. Has everything to do with number of penalties committed. WMU committed two and UND committed two.....why should anyone get a power play out of that?

Penalties don't have to be the same infraction to be coincidental. Any minors assessed at the same stoppage can be coincidental. So the example I gave you their would be 2 sets of coincidental penalties ....no time is put up on the clock, skate five on five and everybody gets out after the first whistle after two minutes. Same with what happened in the game last night....two sets of coincidental penalties....except in that case all four minutes were give to panz so he serves them all.

Each team had two minor penalties. I changed the situation just a bit ....same number of penalties. Just gave Panz's roughing penalty to SImpson. Give me your interruption.

Panz should not have been let out after two min. He should have served 4 min