I threw this notion out there to some (siouxforeverbaby) in the past; given the calendar change why not give it at try.
ANTI-SURVIVOR!
The rules are similar to the normal "Survivor" game played here but with a twist: You need to pick someone who does NOT score a goal.
Additional rules for this "Anti" game:
Your player must be in the game day lineup. (If you had Gornall Friday you're out; if you had Gornall Saturday you advance.)
Goaltenders are not eligible for selection.
I think GB got the better of the game last night and here's why:
Now Minnesota has to host Seattle (only KC is hotter) and GB goes to the best of the mess called the NFC Least (Washington). Seems like a pretty good outcome for GB.
If GB would have won, they'd have had to beat a team three times in a season (and that's not an easy task).
I think someone told the US that their choice is wake up and beat Denmark or have to play Finland in Helsinki in the quarters.
(I'm assuming FIN will beat CZE later today and Finland and US will be the two seeds.)
Question (OK, I know the answer already):
Was there any input from "the public" before the Ben Brien logo was rolled out? Sure, that wasn't a complete reboot (name and logo), but the public heard it was coming but had zero input on the final result.
I'd say at this point anything anyone hears is rash speculation at best. It's far too soon after the first event for the cascading events to be sorted out yet.
Wait, wait, wait ...
We've been told here time and again by NDSU folks that NDSU has no concerns in the realm of Title IX. So why would that fellow bring that up?