Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

The Sicatoka

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    37,085

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    578

 Content Type 

Everything posted by The Sicatoka

  1. The Sicatoka
    You're right. It's not a business. It's a subsidized charity far too often. And with large expenses no less.
  2. The Sicatoka
    The numbers I have say M/W S&D cost about $949k and bring in about $70k. I assume the income is camps or donations. I've been for lacrosse for a while for UND. We could raid Canada for (overage ) mens and womens teams. We could also raid the MSP and DEN metros for western players. And honestly, there are a lot of good athletes around here that are too small for DI BB or DI FB but that could play lax given time to learn (think: red shirt year). UND could do camps to replace the other income. But, UND could play in the HPC and maybe actually gate some income also.
  3. The Sicatoka
    The Toronto Maple Leafs mission statement.
  4. The Sicatoka
    Crazy notion: Kennedy is crazy like a fox. Did he know the IAC was inept and put it on display. Why? After this does anybody want him to deal with them again? Or, for that matter, the IAC's parent the University Senate. He's just proven one body inept, and de facto maybe the other. Pretty bold for me to make that wild assumption. However, from the start he said the final call was his alone. I thought he did this as an olive branch. Who knows, it could be more than that. Remember: he is a politician. And politically he just took the teeth right out of the IAC and the University Senate.
  5. The Sicatoka
    So there are 14 playing BSC FB in 2020 (Idaho in). Nine games. So, is the play to split (N/S? E/W?) into 7 and 7? Schedule would be ... play the 6 in your half (alternating home yearly) and then play three from the other side? How do you pick the three? Rotating? By last year's finish? Nine makes sense when you have ten, but 14? Are BSC teams having trouble filling 3 (or 4) non-BSC games every year? So many questions ...
  6. The Sicatoka
    Truth. http://www.ncaa.com/rankings/bowling/nc
  7. The Sicatoka
  8. The Sicatoka
    Much agreement. Transparency is always best.
  9. The Sicatoka
    < ding ding ding > Yup. Big roster (to balance athlete totals of FB) and fund it to the top 10% of women's rowing (to match top 10% of FB funding).
  10. The Sicatoka
    Honestly, that is the approach many schools have taken.
  11. The Sicatoka
    Title IX is US Federal law. If you don't like it, call Cramer, or Hoeven, or Heitkamp. The NCAA? No comment, but they've been known to enforce some really "interesting" stuff ...
  12. The Sicatoka
    Got their books? I see they have gymnastics and rowing. I'm guessing it's not hard to fund top tier in those to balance football. Assume Bama is top 10% in FB spending. What's it take to be top 10% in spending on gymnastics or rowing? (Probably a rounding error in the FB budget.)
  13. The Sicatoka
    Not a women's sport, but a similar number of athletes. I'd guess VB and softball (and probably soccer too) for them. But "mid level" funding of those sports is relatively cheap (versus top level spending on those).
  14. The Sicatoka
    Completely agree. You and I must be "pull the Band-Aid off fast" guys.
  15. The Sicatoka
    Are they in compliance with the law? (I don't know.)
  16. The Sicatoka
    I'm stating nothing as fact and made no such statement. I'm saying, based on jdub's posts on tiering discussion, it's pretty easy to use WIH to balance out MIH. Why? It'd be more expensive to "tier" in some other women's sports at UND.
  17. The Sicatoka
    I'd say re-read this: http://forum.siouxsports.com/topic/23311-president-kennedy-message-on-athletics/?page=41#comment-891301
  18. The Sicatoka
    Show me NDSU's books and I'll probably be able to show you. However, frankly, who cares what NDSU is doing? Are we sure they are doing it right? Are they ripe for a "prong" or "tier" lawsuit? We don't know. < re-read the first sentence of this post here > Somewhere in this I'm sure I've said "Hammersmith" three times.
  19. The Sicatoka
    Do soccer or softball have top tier facilities like men's hockey does? What more could be done for WBB or VB on that front? I can't prove it, but I'm quite sure that is a big reason women's hockey gets the prime, top tier treatment -- no additional facilities investments need be made. And facilities (construction and cost of ownership) are a big expense. The example give by jdub spells it out pretty well.
  20. The Sicatoka
    Sure, but what about travel and equipment and other obvious expense equity checks for auditors (or SJWs).
  21. The Sicatoka
    Don't confuse the three prongs (comply with one) with tiering. No matter which compliance method you choose you have to follow tiering. Tiering in a nutshell: Just because you have 50%M and 50%W student body and 50%M and 50%W student athletes (complying with prong one), it's not enough. If you have one sport for one sex eating filet mignon and flying first class and using always new equipment and all of the other sex's teams eating Raman and riding buses and using hand-me-downs you're violating Title IX.
  22. The Sicatoka
    It's not just participants but the tiering (see jdub above).
  23. The Sicatoka
    Yup. "Talk is cheap; it takes money to buy whiskey."
  24. The Sicatoka
    Did the coach know the rules and willfully break them? Was the school aware of the actions and allow them or did they take action upon learning of the violations?
  25. The Sicatoka
    We won't know until we find out the decisions.
×
×
  • Create New...