nodak651

Perhaps the choice could have been not to sign the settlement agreement, but once the settlement agreement was signed and UND didn't get approval, we would lose out on the opportunity to host post season fb games, and UND wouldn't have been able to host post season hockey regionals either. I agree that UND should have fought harder, and I think the Pres at the time was happy to retire the logo, but after a certain point, there's nothing that can really be done about it and the President at the time is now gone. You choose not to support the University now, because of the poor leadership of a a president two decades ago? I just don't get the logic there.

Agreed. I mean, if there is any doubt about the trademark rights, they need to in order to satisfy the settlement agreement with the NCAA.

As if they really had a choice?

Such a wasted opportunity. https://www.homefieldapparel.com/ We gotta be one of the only schools not working with this company and they have a ton of great stuff. No reason they can't sell a few vintage T Shirts online. I get that UND needs to develop the Fighting Hawks brand, but at least let people buy something other than knockoffs where UND doesn't even get any royalty money.

I love that Kenny has done so well in the NFL, because I remember dragging one of my good friends to a game, and he was down on UND FB and the talent level at the time (during or shortly after the transition). I distinctly remember him bashing Kenny, saying that he sucked and had brick hands. Whenever I'm with him and an NFL game is on, I remind him of that lol.

This is an overview of the Dakota Legacy Collection (from 2022 when I requested it):

Looks like they don't currently have any apperal on the website with the Sioux logo.

It's really bugged me that UND hasn't worked out a deal with homefield apperal to sell it through them - the sell vintage clothing for universities. It seems UND doesnt want Sioux clothing available for sale on the internet.

Notre Dame has the interlocking ND logo forvthat reason dont they? UND had it first? Or did UND just not file the paperwork?

You know they have a website with a list of meetings that YOU can check.

and not a QB keeper that the opposing D coordinator has seen 20 times on film this season... speaking of, do we have a new OC yet?

Thanks! I tried clipping it. Comments are right here (great summary by the way):

Thanks for that tidbit... was that on their youtube broadcast?

Still annoying that UND hasn't done anything to highlight the new setup. Need like a concise UND produced video that shows ALL areas that a fb player will see. A drone fly through for that would be sick.

PUT ROMFO IN! Jerry sucks now.

Can we add some plays to the playbook?

Put Romfo in Jerry lost his confidence.

So would I. Does the REA/olympic sheet still use R22?

UAA Stonehill tied at start of 2nd. Free live on youtube

I know that. Did you read the first sentence I typed?

Does the REA's olympic sheet still use R22? If so, it seems like it will soon make sense to shrink it down to NHL dimensions given that, in regard to it's intended purpose, it will soon be obsolete. https://www.therinklive.com/mens-division-1/ice-arenas-face-a-dilemma-as-r-22-refrigerant-is-phased-out

The game is on CW - Twin Cities. Not sure if that's available in Grand Forks though.

Unlikely, but everyone want's Youngstown's QB right? Curious if he stays and if he doesn't, it will be interesting to see where he lands. I doubt he would be interested in coming back, but Trey Feeney tore it up at St. Johns this year. I would love to see him transfer to an FCS program to see what he can do though. https://gojohnnies.com/sports/football/roster/trey-feeney/16942 Really happy to see most everyone in this class sign... things are looking up!

It was a lazy low effort post. Sure there are some issues with KEM, but the post was pure negativity without adding anything of substance. I don't think it does any good to constantly post meme's of our biggest donor.

Doubt that... it's black and white that it goes to UND - there's no avenue for anyone to claw it back. Based on what JDub and GFhokaly said, this is probably what UND wants as they will have the ability to make the changes to the usage agreement that are necessary (and they can retain some of the benefits of 3rd party ownership).