NanoBison Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 How about Chapman? He has been looking to move up in the past and he is a big DI proponent. So what better than a school with a program with a rich tradition and 7 DI titles. A move up? You guys are too funny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamsioux Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Only 5 minutes to reel one in! If you took the under, you're a winner! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NanoBison Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Yep, because it certainly had nothing to do that I'm on here at the exact same time as you... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Walrus Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 How about Bruce Smith (current dean of the school of aviation, and former Sioux football player)? By far and away the best canidate, reminds me of our former president and leader Tom Clifford. Bruce Smith gets my VOTE!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammersmith Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Let the speculation as to a successor begin .... Speaking objectively, I'd realistically look for a VP from one of the successful schools of the Big Sky, Mid-Con, or Missouri Valley conferences. Considering UND's mission, a VP from the University of Montana would seem to be a good bet if Montana has one that's ready for a presidential gig. CK is leaving you at a pretty bad time and a leader from one of those conferences would give you the quick start toward personal relationships with the presidents of the schools you'll need in your corner in a few years. I would really hesitate to promote from within or hire someone with UND connections unless they had experience at a mid-major school. Just my $0.02. Speaking as a Bison fan, I'm torn. With CK gone, relations with NDSU can now improve and the rivalry is sure to resume(I think this is a good thing). On the other hand, CK was one of the better things to ever happen to NDSU. Oh well, life goes on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted January 25, 2007 Author Share Posted January 25, 2007 On the other hand, CK was one of the better things to ever happen to NDSU. You realize that you're "dis"-ing you're own guy by attributing NDSU's assumed rise to UND's assumed fall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coach daddy Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 THE NEXT UND PRESIDENT HAS TO HAVE TIES TO THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. NO MORE "BIG SHOTS" FROM CAMPUSES THAT NO NOTHING OF THE TRADITION AND EXCELLENCE THAT IS NORTH DAKOTA. I DON'T CARE WHO IT IS, JUST MAKE SURE HE/SHE IS FROM NORTH DAKOTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Walrus was right; someone like Tom Clifford has to lead this institution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeypat15 Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Phil Jackson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roper1313 Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Oh what a difference a year or two makes. In the spring of 05 many sioux fans were hoping a praying that Kupchella was going to take the job at Marshall. Now there is a staunch defence for him?? What happened? Was the 180 on the name the difference to most? Here's the link to the May 2005 discussion. http://siouxsports.com/forums/index.php?sh...nalist&st=0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamStrait Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Speaking objectively, I'd realistically look for a VP from one of the successful schools of the Big Sky, Mid-Con, or Missouri Valley conferences. Considering UND's mission, a VP from the University of Montana would seem to be a good bet if Montana has one that's ready for a presidential gig. CK is leaving you at a pretty bad time and a leader from one of those conferences would give you the quick start toward personal relationships with the presidents of the schools you'll need in your corner in a few years. I would really hesitate to promote from within or hire someone with UND connections unless they had experience at a mid-major school. Just my $0.02. Speaking as a Bison fan, I'm torn. With CK gone, relations with NDSU can now improve and the rivalry is sure to resume(I think this is a good thing). On the other hand, CK was one of the better things to ever happen to NDSU. Oh well, life goes on. Your already extremely limited credibility continues to decline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux-cia Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Butkus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Phil Jackson NO!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiSioux Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Not to take anything away from the position of President of the University.... but what does this mean for the logo? What if the next president doesn't support the logo, or doesn't care what the majority of the students/staff/faculty/population thinks? On the other hand, what if we get a President that completely supports the use of the Fighting Sioux nickname and continues to fight the NCAA... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coach daddy Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Oh what a difference a year or two makes. In the spring of 05 many sioux fans were hoping a praying that Kupchella was going to take the job at Marshall. Now there is a staunch defence for him?? What happened? Was the 180 on the name the difference to most? Here's the link to the May 2005 discussion. http://siouxsports.com/forums/index.php?sh...nalist&st=0 I don't see anyone defending him here. Am I missing something? We're all citing thoughts and ideas about who the NEW president should be. He won't be missed by most, I guarantee that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxyeahyeah Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Not to take anything away from the position of President of the University.... but what does this mean for the logo? What if the next president doesn't support the logo, or doesn't care what the majority of the students/staff/faculty/population thinks? On the other hand, what if we get a President that completely supports the use of the Fighting Sioux nickname and continues to fight the NCAA... I would think that issue would be safe regardless of the new president for a few reasons: 1) We won't even have "the new guy" until a year from now when a lot will probably have happened toward a conclusion in this, 2) the lawsuit has already been filed and they are working toward settling the issue through that, 3) and most importantly, the UND pres. has to answer to the NDBH on this one and I see no reason to believe that their stance on the issue would change - meaning the new guy would have little say (if any) in the matter. As far as the new guy, I agree with whoever said it should be someone from ND. I think someone who knows the area, the demographics, the cultural and political climate, etc. would be valuable, as well as someone who has good relations with the ND legislature. I don't think many people realize how key it is to have someone working at that level for UND who can get things done during the legislative session. Who that would be, I don't know...there have to be some local/area people who would be well-qualified and represent UND well. Maybe even a "home-grown" candidate would be refreshing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Not to take anything away from the position of President of the University.... but what does this mean for the logo? What if the next president doesn't support the logo, or doesn't care what the majority of the students/staff/faculty/population thinks? On the other hand, what if we get a President that completely supports the use of the Fighting Sioux nickname and continues to fight the NCAA... Hiring a president based on whether a particular candidate is for or against the nickname would be a huge mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Was the 180 on the name the difference to most? What 180 was that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted January 25, 2007 Author Share Posted January 25, 2007 I know some don't always agree with Charles E. Kupchella, but we could have done (and could do) much worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 As far as the new guy, I agree with whoever said it should be someone from ND. I think someone who knows the area, the demographics, the cultural and political climate, etc. would be valuable, as well as someone who has good relations with the ND legislature. I don't think many people realize how key it is to have someone working at that level for UND who can get things done during the legislative session. Who that would be, I don't know...there have to be some local/area people who would be well-qualified and represent UND well. Maybe even a "home-grown" candidate would be refreshing... Perhaps a former governor, who is now on the UND Foundation board, would consider? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted January 25, 2007 Author Share Posted January 25, 2007 How about Myles Brand! That'd be great because then Kupchella could fill the open NCAA position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted January 26, 2007 Share Posted January 26, 2007 I'll do it. My plan is as follows: 1. A bar on campus, probably in the CF Library or Multicultural Centre, or both; 2. Ending of tenure; 3. No classes past noon on Friday; 4. Free beer at the President's abode on Saturday; and 5. Free Stream Yellow billboards on I-29 and I-94. Mo' later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted January 26, 2007 Author Share Posted January 26, 2007 I'll do it. My plan is as follows: 1. A bar on campus, probably in the CF Library or Multicultural Centre, or both; 2. Ending of tenure; 3. No classes past noon on Friday; 4. Free beer at the President's abode on Saturday; and 5. Free Stream Yellow billboards on I-29 and I-94. Mo' later. About 1, CEK beat you: North and South Club Rooms at REA. And about 3, why worry? No one goes anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted January 26, 2007 Share Posted January 26, 2007 And about 3, why worry? No one goes anyway. I believe that starting this semester instructors are allowed to grade on attendance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimdahl Posted January 26, 2007 Share Posted January 26, 2007 Oh what a difference a year or two makes. In the spring of 05 many sioux fans were hoping a praying that Kupchella was going to take the job at Marshall. Now there is a staunch defence for him?? What happened? Was the 180 on the name the difference to most? Here's the link to the May 2005 discussion. http://siouxsports.com/forums/index.php?sh...nalist&st=0 My opinion is the same as it was then: Kupchella has been a great administrator for the University; under his tenure great things have happened in academics, research, funding, and enrollment. He hasn't particularly been buddies with the students and doesn't seem to be a huge sports fan, which is the base for a lot of fans' perception of him, though sports haven't exactly slouched under his tenure: 7 national championship games (vs. 0 in my four years under Clifford / Baker), REA / Alerus / Betty, and a willingness to work with all the interested parties to come up with a plan acceptable to all to begin the transition to D-I. In Kupchella, we're losing a known great administrator. The new guy will have different strengths and weaknesses and different area of emphasis. That's a little exciting, but certainly also a little scary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamStrait Posted January 27, 2007 Share Posted January 27, 2007 CK has really been good for UND. He has been extremely steady, deliberate, and completely competent. He has not been flashy or charismatic, but the first three are far, far more important than the last two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.