sioux24/7 Posted yesterday at 01:18 PM Author Posted yesterday at 01:18 PM I’m a big Ty Danielson fan and I’ve really enjoyed what he’s brought defensively. But it’s funny looking at the numbers. In Summit League play, we have the No. 2 offense behind NDSU, while our defense is No. 5. We do force a lot of turnovers, which fuels the offense, but we also have the worst effective FG% defense, the worst 3P% defense, and give up the highest free throw rate in the league, per KenPom. Bart Torvik is similar: No. 3 offense and No. 6 defense. Quote
nodak651 Posted yesterday at 05:32 PM Posted yesterday at 05:32 PM On 1/20/2026 at 2:06 PM, coachdags said: I believe that mainly should fall on the Alumni Foundation and Administration, although a Coach can certainly help at times. In UND case, we do very little to nothing for any Sports other than Hockey. Not sure you guys remember the UND Baseball Team helped clean the Ralph Engelstead Arena to help support Uniforms and travel for their program until it was cut. UND is doing more Alston payments for basketball and football than most MVC and MAC schools that I've the numbers for so far. Nobody, including Big Ten schools, have shown any institutional NIL payments for fiscal 2025 fyi (will prob start appearing on 2026 reports). Quote
nodak651 Posted yesterday at 05:53 PM Posted yesterday at 05:53 PM Below is from 2025 NCAA reports for FB and MBB and Hockey Ball State FB 0 BB 22K EMU FB 24K BB 56K Miami FB 0 BB 22K Hockey 25K BGSU Zeros NDSU FB 140K BB 14K Omaha Zeros SDSU Zeros SIU FB 0 BB 57K USD FB 57K BB 79K (326K all sports total) Missouri State Zeros Kennesaw FB 1K BB 67K Quote
gfhockey Posted yesterday at 06:30 PM Posted yesterday at 06:30 PM Does it say how much revenue we did last year compared to expenses? I assume it’s always break even but just curious to see if our revenue has raised. Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted yesterday at 06:39 PM Posted yesterday at 06:39 PM watching the byu game last night...looks like they kinda have a raised area behind the hoops for fans...but unlike ours....they are right THERE...not 30 feet back. Quote
coachdags Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago We are a small fish in a big ocean! Mac at Creighton got 12-13 Million- NIL (Team) from the Big East Fox Sports TV Contract alone, just for hoops! That is just one deal, that every Big East MBB got. There are other too, I’m sure. 1 Quote
gfhockey Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 27 minutes ago, coachdags said: We are a small fish in a big ocean! Mac at Creighton got 12-13 Million- NIL (Team) from the Big East Fox Sports TV Contract alone, just for hoops! That is just one deal, that every Big East MBB got. There are other too, I’m sure. Link to our school? Quote
gfhockey Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago How isn’t soccer team and softball team better Quote
jdub27 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 2 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: watching the byu game last night...looks like they kinda have a raised area behind the hoops for fans...but unlike ours....they are right THERE...not 30 feet back. They also have a separate practice facility and don't have to move bleachers to make extra space. It's been explained plenty of times but figure out how to get a practice facility done and they could do some good things on the ends. The current set-up was the only way to add more seating on the baseline and still be able to use the entire space. Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 15 minutes ago, jdub27 said: They also have a separate practice facility and don't have to move bleachers to make extra space. It's been explained plenty of times but figure out how to get a practice facility done and they could do some good things on the ends. The current set-up was the only way to add more seating on the baseline and still be able to use the entire space. agree with everything you said until you said the "the only way"...... 4 Quote
jdub27 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 53 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: agree with everything you said until you said the "the only way"...... Besides what they did, what would alternatives be? Not sure how much larger they make for portable bleachers that are more work to drag across the floor and set up? Not disagreeing on the new setup being less than ideal but honestly curious what other realistic options there were. Quote
nodak651 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 26 minutes ago, jdub27 said: Besides what they did, what would alternatives be? Not sure how much larger they make for portable bleachers that are more work to drag across the floor and set up? Not disagreeing on the new setup being less than ideal but honestly curious what other realistic options there were. 1 Quote
sioux24/7 Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago I don’t like the seating on the ends as much as the next guy, I think a simple not fix but addition that could help people forget about it would be seats on the wood, courtside. They used to have it, I can vividly remember it. Could be an ADA issue though with the walk way behind the seats? Quote
jdub27 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 3 hours ago, nodak651 said: Intriguing. Looks like the height is probably similar but maybe a couple less rows? Wonder what the cost of that would have been but that's the kind of solution I was curious about vs complaining about the same thing over and over Quote
Kab Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Don’t know if possible but I would like to see some balconies on both ends Quote
F'n Hawks Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 32 minutes ago, jdub27 said: Intriguing. Looks like the height is probably similar but maybe a couple less rows? Wonder what the cost of that would have been but that's the kind of solution I was curious about vs complaining about the same thing over and over The main complaint is the fact that it didn’t used to be like this. The seating used to be closer. They made a change for the worse. It would be different if it had always been like this, but it hasn’t 2 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 4 hours ago, jdub27 said: Besides what they did, what would alternatives be? Not sure how much larger they make for portable bleachers that are more work to drag across the floor and set up? Not disagreeing on the new setup being less than ideal but honestly curious what other realistic options there were. get.the.fans.closer.to.the.court.........like hyslop was and others are...it isn't too hard. Quote
gfhockey Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago We lost home court afvantage ourbstudents couldnchirp and get in heads of other team now not so much 3 Quote
Long Snapper 92 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 10 hours ago, jdub27 said: Intriguing. Looks like the height is probably similar but maybe a couple less rows? Wonder what the cost of that would have been but that's the kind of solution I was curious about vs complaining about the same thing over and over Then why couldn’t you suggest a solution instead of just saying that was the only choice for our athletic department to make? When it more than clearly was not the only option for them. It was just the easiest option to make. 2 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Long Snapper 92 said: Then why couldn’t you suggest a solution instead of just saying that was the only choice for our athletic department to make? When it more than clearly was not the only option for them. It was just the easiest option to make. and probably the cheapest.... Quote
jdub27 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 13 hours ago, F'n Hawks said: The main complaint is the fact that it didn’t used to be like this. The seating used to be closer. They made a change for the worse. It would be different if it had always been like this, but it hasn’t It did, but they wanted to increase the amount of baseline seating. 3 hours ago, Long Snapper 92 said: Then why couldn’t you suggest a solution instead of just saying that was the only choice for our athletic department to make? When it more than clearly was not the only option for them. It was just the easiest option to make. I didn't have a solution. Also didn't know that there was an option that one person could remotely move significant amount of seating without damaging the floor. And I'm still not sure if that was a viable option for what they did. The easiest option would have been to do nothing. Quote
Long Snapper 92 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, jdub27 said: It did, but they wanted to increase the amount of baseline seating. I didn't have a solution. Also didn't know that there was an option that one person could remotely move significant amount of seating without damaging the floor. And I'm still not sure if that was a viable option for what they did. The easiest option would have been to do nothing. Okay so you don’t have a solution or even a thought of a potential solution, but can say that the potential solution provided isn’t viable and therefore the AD made the decision to do the only option they had. Got it! Just trying to make sure I got the story straight. Thanks! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.