gfhockey Posted Tuesday at 09:54 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:54 PM 2 hours ago, Siouxdaddy said: Smashing the under on guys who transfer. I bet Komzak, Andrew, McLaughlin gone. Potentially Hedquist too. Otherwise I bet guys stay. Perron I’ve heard gone Quote
RhettRingers Posted Tuesday at 10:03 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:03 PM I think we need to start getting creative with Major Junior. I hope we have someone on the road actually scouting. Quote
RhettRingers Posted Tuesday at 10:10 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:10 PM 15 minutes ago, gfhockey said: Perron I’ve heard gone Not officially but it's rumored that he has an NIL deal in place somewhere. Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted Tuesday at 10:20 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:20 PM If Berry and company lose players , good players, to the portal Chaves would have to make a switch. If that isn’t the final nail it will take years to undo the damage. Quote
brianvf Posted Tuesday at 10:29 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:29 PM 34 minutes ago, Irish said: They have had many opportunities to look in the mirror over the past 8 seasons and have yet to do so - for example another portal goalie next year. What is Karl doing and why isn't he getting a great freshman goalie and developing him? Our roster management is a hot mess. Yep agreed. I would hope if a coaching change isn't made and then a situation like Perron/Boisvert enter portal, that could potentially force a change? Maybe. Who knows with Chaves. The only way I see a no portal goalie next year is if Hobie stays and Heil comes in for a trio of Hedquist/Heil/Huson. 2 Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted Tuesday at 10:44 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:44 PM 1 hour ago, Blackheart said: So we can quote you on this? yes but only the part that says it's 100% speculation, there are no sources, and that it must be taken with a grain of salt. Quote
.357 Posted Tuesday at 11:13 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:13 PM 1 hour ago, brianvf said: There's been rumblings about Perron transferring too. Where specifically are you hearing these rumblings from about Perron? 2 hours ago, hockeytherapy13 said: I'd be very surprised if Boisvert isn't playing out east or at Michigan state. Curious why you think Boisvert is almost a lock to go, & why in particular he would go to MSU of all schools if not out east. Quote
Blackheart Posted Tuesday at 11:36 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:36 PM 52 minutes ago, hockeytherapy13 said: yes but only the part that says it's 100% speculation, there are no sources, and that it must be taken with a grain of salt. 1 Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted Tuesday at 11:49 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:49 PM 37 minutes ago, .357 said: Where specifically are you hearing these rumblings from about Perron? Curious why you think Boisvert is almost a lock to go, & why in particular he would go to MSU of all schools if not out east. I’d lean toward Maine or BC since they are both thriving, let their offensive players flap their wings, and will have some openings for top 6 forward roles next year. Plus those are closer to home for him. Michigan state is getting a ton of high end recruits, are displaying a winning culture and will possibly lose a couple forwards early to pros. All speculation haha Quote
brianvf Posted Tuesday at 11:57 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:57 PM We just need that 1883 Collective to start giving some paydays to these boys to keep them in GF a bit longer. Keep some players like Boisvert, Perron, James, Swanson...and then add in Zellers next year? That's a good amount of potential offensive talent on the top 2 lines. 1 Quote
tnt Posted yesterday at 12:53 AM Posted yesterday at 12:53 AM Wouldn’t it be something if fans get so fed up with the pay for play, that they start chanting overrated to an underperforming NIL player on their own team. Quote
.357 Posted yesterday at 01:25 AM Posted yesterday at 01:25 AM 1 hour ago, brianvf said: We just need that 1883 Collective to start giving some paydays to these boys to keep them in GF a bit longer. Keep some players like Boisvert, Perron, James, Swanson...and then add in Zellers next year? That's a good amount of potential offensive talent on the top 2 lines. From what I understand, the 1883 is just a brokerage, not a source of funding. Not much info about NIL on the Internet, but from what I've read NIL money comes from businesses, private sponsors & boosters of which a collective can solicit money from; not the school itself. I would imagine that because UND hockey is so popular in GF & the biggest show in town (borderline cult-like), that there would be some wealthy alumni & local businesses supporting the 1883 for hockey purposes. Just last summer, Dan & Jolene Mikkelson of GF donated $2 million to the hockey program for scholarships. Would be nice if they could use some of that money for NIL purposes, but perhaps the Mikkelsons want it to go solely for scholarships. Then you have the Englestads, Rydell & other very wealthy locals that you would think are gifting NIL money for the hockey program because it's such a staple there. You would probably see more NIL contributions if the IRS classified it as a tax deductible donation, which it currently is not. Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted yesterday at 02:57 AM Posted yesterday at 02:57 AM 5 hours ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: I'm all for hearing the argument Hobie should've been given a few more opportunities this year but how calling TJ the inferior goalie is flat out wrong by almost every measure(Wins, SV%, GAA). Did you watch the Denver series? Hobie 3-4-0 SV .897 GAA 2.74 TJ 12-8-2 SV .905 GAA 2.64 These metrics would not hold up for a proper argument on who is a better goalie haha. Less than 1% difference in save percentage when the sample size is 7 games vs 22 games? I saw the Denver game and TJ was truly great; I’d even say it’s safe to note he probably won us that game even though our team D was better than it’s been most of the year. But being great here and there hardly equals the leash he’s been given. Hobie has had great games and then TJ still gets the start the next Friday. Hobie has had good games where we lose and the goals allowed were when he was absolutely hung out to dry. Berry has said he wanted one goalie to take over but what he meant was he wants TJ to just play well enough so he could take over. Watch TJ play enough and you see how often he gets out of position laterally and sometimes it’s not just a little bit. Hobie is not perfect but he is better at staying in position and not swimming out in La La land. Hobie also has the size advantage which matters nowadays with the exception of some outliers (and if you don’t have the size you have to be incredible positionally, which TJ is not). Let’s be clear, there’s not a massive chasm of difference between them because neither has been spectacular. But Hobie has never been given a chance to string a few together because if he makes a mistake (especially since most nights we are bad in our D zone), it’s automatically TJ the next night. give TJ the edge in playing the puck but only by a small margin. With 2 goalies who are similar in metrics, play the one with size and who can be developed. He’s only a sophomore but the last time we won a natty was with a sophomore in net. 4 Quote
cberkas Posted yesterday at 08:21 PM Posted yesterday at 08:21 PM I guess I should prepare myself with all the talk of the mass exodus that will happen at the end of the year. I'm going to go with Berry had to replace 11 forwards, 2 goalies from the portal that will be here for a year, and 5 maybe 6 defensemen. Or they don't lose anyone early. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.