stoneySIOUX Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 12 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said: woll is wall with a hole in it... OMG that is fantastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FGHTNSX Hawkey14 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 Wow. The Swedes were trying to lose that in the last 10 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 They deserved to lose with how they played the 3rd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianvf Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 How many goals against Woll this tourney went high glove side? I'm guessing 3/4 of his goals against went high glove. Why keep playing a goaltender that has such a glaring weakness that opposing players have obviously keyed in on it? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 49 minutes ago, iluvdebbies said: With the lack of spacing between the three....it was basically a 1-0. He did the right thing by taking the shot. Disagree. He helped cause the bad spacing. He veers left, then snaps a pass to the shooter on the right, goal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, MafiaMan said: Disagree. He helped cause the bad spacing. He veers left, then snaps a pass to the shooter on the right, goal. Or Bellows crosses to the other side for a backhand pass to an open net instead of running into the goalie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, brianvf said: How many goals against Woll this tourney went high glove side? I'm guessing 3/4 of his goals against went high glove. Why keep playing a goaltender that has such a glaring weakness that opposing players have obviously keyed in on it? I didn’t think Woll or Oettinger were good choices with how they have been at BC and BU this year. Goaltending was going to be the weakness. The half ass backchecking cost this team the most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 Just now, cberkas said: I didn’t think Woll or Oettinger were good choices with how they have been at BC and BU this year. Goaltending was going to be the weakness. The half ass backchecking cost this team the most. I agree with the back checking, what goalie would you have selected? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 The Olympic team in Sochi didn’t think the Bronze was worth winning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxScore Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 1 hour ago, MafiaMan said: Mittelstadt has done a lot of things right in this tournament...that 3-on-0 was NOT one of them though. No problem with the decision just seemed like the puck rolled on him a little and he didn't get as much on it as he wanted to. He has been the best player for the U.S. the entire tournament and is the guy I'd want to have the shot in that situation. Spacing wasn't very good to really move the puck on the opportunity either. Bottom line though you get a 3-on-0 chance against a good team and it has to end up in the net. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 18 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said: I agree with the back checking, what goalie would you have selected? That would be the problem, had to go with who was available for the position. 15 and 5 cost the US goal number 2 and Anderson coasting on his backcheck cost goal number 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 Not impressed with Mikey Anderson, lot of errors even I noticed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 Go Chex, 1-0 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 1 hour ago, SiouxScore said: No problem with the decision just seemed like the puck rolled on him a little and he didn't get as much on it as he wanted to. He has been the best player for the U.S. the entire tournament and is the guy I'd want to have the shot in that situation. Spacing wasn't very good to really move the puck on the opportunity either. Bottom line though you get a 3-on-0 chance against a good team and it has to end up in the net. Then it really can't be defined as a 3-on-0 when CM essentially turned it into a breakaway by himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 and the 'nucks tie it up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 So Comtois gets 3 jabs in against Michnac and when the Czech finally has had enough and retaliates, the official standing five feet away immediately calls a penalty. Wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 And, of course, the TSN homers inmediately call it a "poor penalty" on the Czechs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 Total BS penalty call and subsequent PP goal... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 And Canada gets "an unfortunate" high-sticking penalty! LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 Did they not say anything about the Canadien goalie and his intermission "show" yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted January 5, 2018 Author Share Posted January 5, 2018 5 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said: Did they not say anything about the Canadien goalie and his intermission "show" yet? Enlighten me please?? 3-1 Canada after a big Canadian dive leads to a power play goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted January 5, 2018 Author Share Posted January 5, 2018 4-1 Canada and that'll do it for the Czechs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, Wilbur said: 4-1 Canada and that'll do it for the Czechs. Good night ladies and gentlemen! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 5-1 Canada and I'm out. Time to catch up on some DVR recordings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted January 5, 2018 Author Share Posted January 5, 2018 3 hours ago, brianvf said: How many goals against Woll this tourney went high glove side? I'm guessing 3/4 of his goals against went high glove. Why keep playing a goaltender that has such a glaring weakness that opposing players have obviously keyed in on it? Just watched the game highlights and my ohh my did Sweden expose what Finland exposed a few games ago on Woll. 6-1 Canada...the route is on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.