sprig Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 $1M question from a not so great hockey mind; intent to blow the whistle for what reason? Was the ref about to call a penalty, did he lose sight of the puck,...? Did they give an official reason as to why there "was intent to blow the whistle"? There had to be a reason unless it's an outright lie. Watch the Hak postgame interview. He was told by the referee that he didn't see the puck in the net, not the "intent to blow the whistle" excuse. Quote
808287 Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Watch the Hak postgame interview. He was told by the referee that he didn't see the puck in the net, not the "intent to blow the whistle" excuse. Does that mean that the ref did not see it on the replay? Wow. I could even see it on the overhead view next to the goalies' leg. And if he didn't see it in real time, it's because he didn't look where Gaarder was pointing. I guess. That's just a crazy explaination. Replay should have fixed that. And if you watch the replay with a behind the net view, it almost looks as though the ref is signaling a goal before he grabs the back of the net. Right about the time the puck is sliding along the goalies' leg. Really poor review, but water under the bridge. If we get DU at the Target Center this will be good incentive to set the record straight. Quote
sprig Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Does that mean that the ref did not see it on the replay? Wow. I could even see it on the overhead view next to the goalies' leg. And if he didn't see it in real time, it's because he didn't look where Gaarder was pointing. I guess. That's just a crazy explaination. Replay should have fixed that. And if you watch the replay with a behind the net view, it almost looks as though the ref is signaling a goal before he grabs the back of the net. Right about the time the puck is sliding along the goalies' leg. Really poor review, but water under the bridge. If we get DU at the Target Center this will be good incentive to set the record straight.I agree, and even more strange, the replay shows him bending over the net, looking exactly where Gaarder is pointing. Lends credence to the comment that pucks aren't in Braille. Quote
sprig Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 That's exacty what I compared it to. Seguins just happened to result in an injury. Moore should sit next game imho. Drake's jump as the clip occurs probably prevented a knee injury like Seguin's. Doesn't make the low hit less cheap though. Quote
burd Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 I agree, and even more strange, the replay shows him bending over the net, looking exactly where Gaarder is pointing. Lends credence to the comment that pucks aren't in Braille. It's one of those mysterious time-delay things. They didn't see the puck bouncing around in the net until time was about to expire in OT. Quote
90siouxfan Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 It's one of those mysterious time-delay things. They didn't see the puck bouncing around in the net until time was about to expire in OT. on the OT thing, I only saw DU players celebrating, did the refs signal a goal or look at a review? Quote
OgioloD Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 on the OT thing, I only saw DU players celebrating, did the refs signal a goal or look at a review? The refs indeed signaled a goal when they say the DU players celebrating even though the puck was no longer in the rink. But when the puck is in the goal, they waive it off... Haha Is there a rule at all that the officials must see the puck in the net to rule a goal? Because he did indeed signal a goal. Quote
90siouxfan Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Put a electronic tracker in the puck and take the mental incompetence of referees out of the equation? Quote
sprig Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Is there a rule at all that the officials must see the puck in the net to rule a goal? Because he did indeed signal a goal. Yes, they must see the puck cross the goal line, then point to signal goal. I don't think he saw this one. Quote
OgioloD Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Yes, they must see the puck cross the goal line, then point to signal goal. I don't think he saw this one. Yet he still signaled a goal on ice before the review, cool.... Quote
90siouxfan Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Yet he still signaled a goal on ice before the review, cool.... Yeah, what a display of credibility and competence Quote
NewUNDAlum Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 On a separate subject. I really don't like how we have our lines set up. 1. I'm still not a huge fan of Mattson. I know he has played decently well as of late but I still don't feel comfortable with him on the ice. 2. I love Poolman but I hate him on the Park-Mac line. I want to see one of the following two line combinations: #15-#16-#08 #29-#09-#27 #03-#28-#17 #21-#13-#14 #04-#24 #02-#06 #20-#05 Or #15-#16-#08 #29-#09-#27 #11-#28-#17 #21-#13-#14 #04-#24 #02-#06 #20-#03 Quote
Goon Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 That is your opinion and I respect it. However Brad Marchand's hit on Sami Salo in the NHL IN 2012 resulted in a 5 game suspension and a $152,000+ fine. His hit resulted in a concussion. Moore's hit could have had at the very minimum resulted in a concussion. COMPARING DMITRI KULIKOV AND TREVOR MOORE’S HITS Quote
burd Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Yet he still signaled a goal on ice before the review, cool.... The guy behind the net? At what point did he signal goal? Quote
OgioloD Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 The guy behind the net? At what point did he signal goal? at 3:16 on the video goon posted you can see him signal it. They don't show him during the replays just live. Quote
90siouxfan Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 The guy behind the net? At what point did he signal goal? Pretty sad that there are so many referring issues that we can't keep them straight. t Quote
burd Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Pretty sad that there are so many referring issues that we can't keep them straight. t Must be a software program for this. If not, there will soon will be at some NCHC school. Quote
90siouxfan Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Write an app, you will make millions Quote
squirtcoach Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 COMPARING DMITRI KULIKOV AND TREVOR MOORE’S HITS The biggest difference between the Kulikov clip and the Moore clip is that Seguin had the puck and Caggiula did not. And of course Kulikov, receives a game misconduct, a suspension, and a fine, which he should. Sadly, Moore will get none of these. Quote
90siouxfan Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Didn't Seguin take the hit from the side where as Drake from the front? Quote
scpa0305 Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 On a separate subject. I really don't like how we have our lines set up. 1. I'm still not a huge fan of Mattson. I know he has played decently well as of late but I still don't feel comfortable with him on the ice. 2. I love Poolman but I hate him on the Park-Mac line. I want to see one of the following two line combinations: #15-#16-#08 #29-#09-#27 #03-#28-#17 #21-#13-#14 #04-#24 #02-#06 #20-#05 Or #15-#16-#08 #29-#09-#27 #11-#28-#17 #21-#13-#14 #04-#24 #02-#06 #20-#03 I really like those lines however I think a Olson or Simonson may work better than at Clair. Also, I think mattson has been solid. Quote
scpa0305 Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Didn't Seguin take the hit from the side where as Drake from the front? Yup clipped the side of his leg. Quote
Fetch Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 I just read all the post game posts & I feel worse than after seeing it live Quote
Oxbow6 Posted February 16, 2015 Posted February 16, 2015 I really like those lines however I think a Olson or Simonson may work better than at Clair. Also, I think mattson has been solid. If healthy no way Colton sits from here on out. He is great on the PK and great on the walls and good in the D end. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted February 16, 2015 Posted February 16, 2015 I just read all the post game posts & I feel worse than after seeing it live Both DU goals in the 3rd happened 60 feet from me.......seeing it live is worse as both were gifts. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.