lomackman Posted March 26, 2011 Posted March 26, 2011 Genoway was a +5 in the SCUS series in Dec, +3 against Robert Morris, +4 against Mich Tech playoff, and +2 against UMD holiday game. This is a +14 in 7 games. This leaves him a -7 over the remaining 27 games he played. It is only stats. I see you fail to mention a negative one in a game UND won 11-2. It is not only stats it proofs that he is a defensive liablity. Without those points against weaker teams to bring up his numbers how low he would have been otherwise. Thank you for making my argument for me. Quote
passit_offthegoalie Posted March 26, 2011 Posted March 26, 2011 The coaching adjustment that I would like to see is that the Sioux not come out in thier first game in the regional flat and lose, same thing in the Frozen Four especially if they play BC? How many years in a row now have they come out flat and lost? At least five, I think. Why is it so hard for every game in the NCAA tourney? It has been so endlessly frustrating! We dodged that bullet. Quote
yzerman19 Posted March 26, 2011 Posted March 26, 2011 Sioux have a .6818 win% (7-3-1) against remaining tourney teams (that we've played): Denver, Notre Dame, Duluth, CC. Go Sioux!! Quote
Oxbow6 Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 For me, it's this simple...make sure JG is in the lineup! He's a difference maker! He was yesterday and will be today as well. Side note, I'd be shocked if Nelson plays. He looked like he was out cold for a little bit. I say Rowney centers Kristo and Dickin and Davidson goes back with Mario and Rodwell. Quote
yzerman19 Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 He's a difference maker! He was yesterday and will be today as well. Side note, I'd be shocked if Nelson plays. He looked like he was out cold for a little bit. I say Rowney centers Kristo and Dickin and Davidson goes back with Mario and Rodwell. I'd say Rowney centers Kristo and Davidson and they put Gleason out with Mario and Rodwell. Quote
burd Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 What happened to CC last night illustrates just how important it is that the Sioux stay out of the box. UMich only scored one PPG, but CC's rhythm was completely messed up, partly from all the specialty team involvement. With the way Renss came out with the physical play yesterday , I was afraid the Sioux would start taking stupid penalties. They did not, and that took discipline--and some smarts. Maybe even Hextall has figured this out. If they establish some flow today and roll all their lines, they will win, IMO. Good luck, boys. Put the d-dancer out on the golf course where he belongs. I'll bet he talks when others putt. And fudges his lie. And adds his score wrong. Grrrr. They're worse than gophers. Go get 'em. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 I'd say Rowney centers Kristo and Davidson and they put Gleason out with Mario and Rodwell. That would work too. I just think in a close grind it out game, Dickin provides some grit on the walls and IMO really complimented Kristo in the F5 last week. Gleason just doesn't do much for me at forward. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 What happened to CC last night illustrates just how important it is that the Sioux stay out of the box. UMich only scored one PPG, but CC's rhythm was completely messed up, partly from all the specialty team involvement. With the way Renss came out with the physical play yesterday , I was afraid the Sioux would start taking stupid penalties. They did not, and that took discipline--and some smarts. Maybe even Hextall has figured this out. If they establish some flow today and roll all their lines, they will win, IMO. Good luck, boys. Put the d-dancer out on the golf course where he belongs. I'll bet he talks when others putt. And fudges his lie. And adds his score wrong. Grrrr. They're worse than gophers. Go get 'em. Totally agree...UND kept their composure...especially after the Nelson hit. I thought RPI was reckless and undisciplined for most of the game. 26 year old Canadians >>> Smart kids! Quote
yzerman19 Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 That would work too. I just think in a close grind it out game, Dickin provides some grit on the walls and IMO really complimented Kristo in the F5 last week. Gleason just doesn't do much for me at forward. I hear ya, but I really like Davidson on the off Kristo wing...Fourth line could be Mario, Dickin, and Rodwell I suppose. That enough grit for ya? Bottom line is 3 periods of hockey for a trip to the Frozen Four. Can't let DU dictate the style of game this becomes. Quote
lomackman Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 Totally agree...UND kept their composure...especially after the Nelson hit. I thought RPI was reckless and undisciplined for most of the game. 26 year old Canadians >>> Smart kids! What is with this 26 year old Canadians and smart kids comment? I doubt most of the UND players would make it into RPI based on grades. 3 Quote
siouxhockeygirl14 Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 What is with this 26 year old Canadians and smart kids comment? I doubt most of the UND players would make it into RPI based on grades. 16 players made the WCHA All Academic Team.Once again you don't know what you're talking about. Quote
passit_offthegoalie Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 What is with this 26 year old Canadians and smart kids comment? I doubt most of the UND players would make it into RPI based on grades. He's calling RPI smart kids, I think he knows that they got into a good school. Is Syphilis slowly eating away at your brain from the inside, or something? You're making less and less sense. Quote
bisonh8er Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 What is with this 26 year old Canadians and smart kids comment? I doubt most of the UND players would make it into RPI based on grades. Why do people assume people from UND are dumb? I've always thought UND offers an above average education. RPI is based primarily of engineers. We have an engineering school, not on the level of RPI but we have one. Just the same as RPI doesn't have a medical or aviation school on par with UND. Its all relative. Quote
Uncle_Rico Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 And this means what? This means you don't understand plus/minus and shouldn't commenting on it. 1 Quote
cbcsioux Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 Genoway is an excellent defenseman. In four plus years how often have you seen someone take the puck around him, past him, or over him. He is excellent with his stick and he sticks with forwards as they come across the blue line forcing them outside or else poke checks the puck away. I think that is waht he is supposed to do. He doesn't knock them over but he knocks them off of their route and you don't see the opponents get good shots because he either poke checks the puck or ties up their sticks. He gets the job done as a defenseman but his offensive skills are so much better than most defensemen, we overlook the fact that he is an excellent blueliner. I think if you told coaches from around the league or scouts people here think he is a defensive liability they would laugh. Most coaches would take 6 of him in a minute. His smarts, speed. quickness and stick handling skills tht make him so good offensively are also what make him an excellent defenseman. Who is Genoway drafted by? I will bet any stock he may have had at the beginning of the year is no longer there. It's the reason he is back because there was not any interest last year, the year before, or the present. Don't think the scouts or coaches have missed him do you? 2 Quote
fargosioux Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 Who is Genoway drafted by? I will bet any stock he may have had at the beginning of the year is no longer there. It's the reason he is back because there was not any interest last year, the year before, or the present. Don't think the scouts or coaches have missed him do you? Only listed on hockeysfuture.com as one of the top 10 undrafted college players. I guess his stock isn't as bad as you suggest: Hockey's Future Link Quote
mikejm Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 "One attribute that makes Genoway such a superb defenseman is that his offensive game never comes at the expense of his defensive responsibilities." Haters gonna hate... Quote
lakeshoe Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 Why do people assume people from UND are dumb? I've always thought UND offers an above average education. RPI is based primarily of engineers. We have an engineering school, not on the level of RPI but we have one. Just the same as RPI doesn't have a medical or aviation school on par with UND. Its all relative. I beg to disagree that UND School of Engineering and Mines doesn't measure up with any other engineering school. I am a BSME graduate from UND 1996 and am damned proud of it! A couple of profs weren't my favorites but overall an excellent engineering school. Quote
tho0505 Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 Only listed on hockeysfuture.com as one of the top 10 undrafted college players. I guess his stock isn't as bad as you suggest: Hockey's Future Link Thats a solid list too. Already two players from that list have been signed. Genoway could have easily got to the European leagues last year. Not every Senior leader on a top program is going make it in the NHL/AHL, but I'm sure he'll have a productive career in Europe. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.