Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, brianvf said:

Updated Commit Stats as of Nov 9:

  • MacKenzie is on fire with 1-8-9 in his last 5 games
  • MacKenzie is 2nd in the WHL in scoring, only 2pts back of Lin
  • Simpson is 2nd in the USHL in points, 2nd in assists, and 5th in pts/gm 

Forwards

  • B. Schultz (USHL Sioux Falls) - '05: 14gp - 1g/3a
  • Pilgrim (USHL Tri-City) - '06: 18gp - 6g/9a
  • A. Schultz (USHL Chicago) - '06: 11gp - 5g/3a
  • O'Neill (WHL Edmonton) - '07: 20gp - 9g/5a
  • Sanderson (USHL Muskegon) - '07: 16gp - 6g/5a
  • Simpson (USHL Youngstown) - '07: 17gp - 8g/14a
  • Jundt (WHL Calgary) - '08: 16gp - 2g/2a
  • Williams (WHL Saskatoon) - '08: 18gp - 7g/8a
  • DeMars (WHL Penticton) - '09: 16gp - 0g/3a
  • Grubb (SSM 18U Prep) - '09: 15gp - 3g/7a
  • McKamey (WHL Victoria) - '09: 3gp - 0g/0a

Defensemen

  • MacKenzie (WHL Edmonton) - '06: 20gp - 5g/15a
  • Lindberg (USHL Fargo) - '07: 15gp - 2g/4a
  • Penner (USHL Fargo) - '08: 8gp - 0g/0a

Goalies

  • Heil (USHL Madison) - '06: 12gp - 2.91 / .883 (7-4-1)

I would like to see a lot more out of Brock Schultz. Especially because he is about to age out of juniors and we just committed him a couple of months ago.

Posted
5 minutes ago, LuvHockey said:

Thanks brianvf for posting these!

No worries, I enjoy tracking their stats as the season progresses!

3 minutes ago, beastandco said:

I would like to see a lot more out of Brock Schultz. Especially because he is about to age out of juniors and we just committed him a couple of months ago.

Def agreed.  I mentioned it on the last stats update that he was sure starting slow for a guy supposedly coming to UND next fall.
He just got traded from Waterloo to SF, so hopefully the change of location gets him more opportunities to flourish and get confidence before next season.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, brianvf said:

No worries, I enjoy tracking their stats as the season progresses!

Def agreed.  I mentioned it on the last stats update that he was sure starting slow for a guy supposedly coming to UND next fall.
He just got traded from Waterloo to SF, so hopefully the change of location gets him more opportunities to flourish and get confidence before next season.

I think they committed him thinking he would make a jump similar to what Pilgrim is doing this year. Hopefully the change of scenery works well for him. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, beastandco said:

I would like to see a lot more out of Brock Schultz. Especially because he is about to age out of juniors and we just committed him a couple of months ago.

I get that numbers aren’t the only picture, but you are correct, that you would think a veteran would be putting up some offense.  Perhaps they should have looked at flipping Tyden Bergeson, who is doing quite well with Madison, and would fit well with the other Moorhead boys.

 

Posted
13 hours ago, beastandco said:

I think they committed him thinking he would make a jump similar to what Pilgrim is doing this year. Hopefully the change of scenery works well for him. 

 

14 hours ago, beastandco said:

I would like to see a lot more out of Brock Schultz. Especially because he is about to age out of juniors and we just committed him a couple of months ago.

Have either of you seen Brock play this year? 

Posted
32 minutes ago, RhettRingers said:

 

Have either of you seen Brock play this year? 

I have not. Don’t get me wrong, you need players like Brock to come in and be okay with playing limited minutes for the first couple of years. It’s just going to be hard to justify bringing him in next year over a couple of guys that have been better this year than expected.

There is still a ton of season left for improvement and I hope he shows more offensive production.

Posted
31 minutes ago, cberkas said:

World jr A challenge:

Caleb Heil

Carson Pilgrim

Carter Sandsrson

Garrett Lindberg

Ashton Schultz

I wonder why Simpson isn’t in that lineup?

Posted
12 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

I wonder why Simpson isn’t in that lineup?

Maybe they realized that we have nearly a third of the roster and have to pick one less LOL.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

I wonder why Simpson isn’t in that lineup?

I haven't watched Simpson much myself, but from what people say it sounds like he is not very well suited for a bottom 6 role. Maybe they thought they had enough scoring without him and needed more role players. Still surprised they wouldn't take him over some others in a scoring role though

Posted
1 hour ago, Fratt Mattin said:

I haven't watched Simpson much myself, but from what people say it sounds like he is not very well suited for a bottom 6 role. Maybe they thought they had enough scoring without him and needed more role players. Still surprised they wouldn't take him over some others in a scoring role though

Right…from a pure scoring perspective he’s second in the entire league in points. I’m assuming he’s dinged up and needs some rest…or a character type deal.

Posted
29 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

And he was the one they passed on 😁

🤷‍♂️

27 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

Right…from a pure scoring perspective he’s second in the entire league in points. I’m assuming he’s dinged up and needs some rest…or a character type deal.

Bumps was the first thing I thought of

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...