fightingsioux4life

Considering how often Hak shuffles the lines, who knows how long these guys will play together.

Yeah, but it's been their motto for about 50 years now. And they still don't have enough bricks laid to form one wall of a one-room building!

I think he was being sarcastic with the negative message board comment. He should have used the at the end of it.

I was calling him out for dictating terms to other posters on what is and is not acceptable here and for assuming that everyone else on this forum is here only to "exchange information" and not offer opinions and (sometimes) passionate viewpoints. And that does include, from time to time, complaining. Problems that are not pointed out are problems that are never solved.

Come on now, I was having a good Monday morning (what an oxymoron that is) and you just had to bring that up.

That is correct. Get rid of the deadwood on the roster and establish new standards, goals and expectations and you'll see a much better product on the field sooner rather than later. The "signature wins" might take some time to get, but I am willing to wait for those. Changing the culture is the first step.

This is another theme that I was hoping was behind us. Gothberg has to develop some game to game consistency or else he'll have to settle for being a back-up to someone else.

I must disagree with you on Hunter. He was calling out the ownership and front office for being penny-wise and pound-foolish, which they are still doing. After this year's debacle, the Star Tribune did a series on what needs to be fixed with the Twins. Terry Ryan and company acknowledged that the team needs to change some things to win again, but still talked like they weren't going to change anything to get there. New stadium, more revenues, same tired old Twins. Some things (unfortunately) never change.

No you don't. All you do is come on here and talk like a wanna-be economist who knows everything. I think people would get along with you better if you would drop the professorial act and talk to people like the ordinary Joes and Janes that they are. No you are not. You are here to defend any and every decision made by the powers-that-be, no matter how fishy their explanations are sometimes. Holding decision-makers accountable is an important part of being a stakeholder in an athletic department. And each and every one of us that buys tickets to games, donates to the Champions Club and travels to road games to support our teams are stakeholders. And that is your prerogative. But you should understand that a discussion forum like this is a place where people vent, express their opinions AND trade information. You should remember that the next time you scold someone for being too opinionated and passionate about a topic. What bothers some of us is certain posters telling other posters which opinions and viewpoints are or are not acceptable here. Does that remind you of someone?

What is it with Hakstol-coached teams winning on Friday night and laying a big, fat, steaming turd on Saturday night? Hopefully, this team will develop consistency by Christmas. And I think winning at home will be important in a stacked conference like the NCHC.

Well, I hope the Mussman apologists have been convinced that this regime isn't going to get it done. This is Mussman's show and it has turned into the Gong Show. In six seasons, Mussman has managed to turn a solid D-II program into a weak FCS program that couldn't beat most of our good teams from the early 2000's. He is in over his head and it's time for a change. I am with Siouxperfan7, I want it to happen NOW. I want Faison to make a statement that this type of crap will not be tolerated at the University of North Dakota. Calling a press conference on Monday morning to make an announcement about the future of the football program would send that message.

That is a pure cop-out. We used to have teams that skated the puck in and we have always played on 200 x 85 ice. It's just that we have a coaching staff that refuses to do anything but dump it in. I honestly wish they would be willing to make an exception to that rule in situations where it clearly does not work. We all know what the definition of insanity is.

The entertainment is watching the game of hockey being played at a high level by the best in the world. Hockey, minus obstruction holding, is one of the most entertaining sports in the world to watch. It's fast, physical and requires strength and athleticism. They also could make the nets wider and taller, which would result in more goals and more highlights on ESPN. But it would diminish the quality of the product for a few cheap thrills. Maybe I sound like a cranky old man (I'm only 39!), but that is how I feel about it.

This is the problem with society right now. Everything is about "entertainment" and if it isn't "entertaining", it should be changed even if the solution is a colossal joke. And this is one prime example. And don't think for a second that some genius looking to boost TV ratings will start pushing to have shootouts in the playoffs. That would be the last straw for me and a lot of other people.

Why is that? Some leagues now have shootouts and some don't. I think Hockey East experimented with shootouts many years ago and decided not to keep them. A 4x4 OT format would be far less disruptive to continuity between leagues.

Have a 10 minute, 4 x 4 OT period. That would eliminate a lot of the ties. And it would be team vs. team, not player vs. player.

Maybe they won't take us seriously like Eastern Washington?

I am still not sold on the shootout; it takes away from the team aspect. But as long as they aren't used in the playoffs, I can live with it.

Toews is Exhibit A for why college hockey is not the black hole for NHL prospects that people like Don Cherry want us to believe.

Cal-Poly

I think your assessment is spot-on.

Apples and oranges. The Alerus Center was built by the City of Grand Forks to promote economic development and bring in outside dollars. UND is just another client of the Alerus Center. REA was specifically built with a mission to benefit UND and UND athletics. So charging UND to play there would be a slap in the face and a knife in the back. And I don't see that ever happening.

Not as easy as 82SiouxGuy says it is, is it? You almost have to be a lawyer to understand those forms; which is why doing your taxes every April is such a pain in the butt. He should remember that the next time he scolds and preaches to others on what they should or shouldn't do.

Looks like it does: http://collegehockeyinc.com/ I think a lot of their work is behind the scenes, but it wouldn't hurt for them to be more visible and more active in confronting the CHL and their sleazy tactics.

This is why you shouldn't believe everything businesses tell you. Sometimes they are just trying to placate the public when the truth would tick people off. I guess that is my complaint!