Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

UND1983

Members
  • Posts

    8,545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Everything posted by UND1983

  1. He has no idea what he is talking about. Read my post above.
  2. Size of the defensive lineman has nothing to do with anything. Their defensive lineman have never been huge but have been tougher than hell and good. The problem with UND's offensive line is their is little depth and some are too weak/thin to help at this point.
  3. Exactly right. But the media could not turn to UND for a comment anymore because they moved on and did everything they were supposed to do to solve these issues. "Take it up with the group that did it"......
  4. But if they have a new nickname nobody will care-not UND's fault. If they keep the elephant in the room, in the room, it will be a big deal.
  5. My opinion: It will be nice having a UND guy do UND football games. Not a guy who spends 5 days a week talking about NDSU on the radio in Fargo and then travels up to UND games on the weekend. That setup sucked. Like Jack but the setup was bad.
  6. I believe you are wrong.
  7. Big Sky doesn't have honorable mention. You really should be above bragging about HM.
  8. Here is your "let's just go with no nickname crowd (because the choices are bad)". Seriously, they brought their kids to the rally and had them make signs. Has nothing to do with the old nickname at all.
  9. Considering NDSU only had 3 total I am not surprised UND had 0.
  10. So who do you think the crowd is that are writing letters to the editor trying to rip apart a former president? What option do those people want and why?
  11. An addendum only changes what is addressed in the addendum itself. It does not pertain to anything that it does not discuss.
  12. Oh really? What about the past 5-10 years makes you think there wouldn't be any "fuss"?
  13. Have you been paying attention at all? The No Nickname people ARE the Sioux Forever people. They don't want a nickname so they can keep calling it them the Sioux. Of course they are going to tear apart each name choice, they don't want one! C'mon.
  14. That is not a scare tactic, it is a simple question. Scare tactics are when Sioux Lovers dig up dirt on an ex-president trying to make him seem like a horrible human being so people won't vote for Roughriders. That was about as desperate of a scare tactic as I have ever seen.
  15. You're missing something here. Read the post above yours. The NCAA and sanctions over the old nickname was the problem back in the day. Everyone wants to know if it will pop up again by not having a nickname. Wish Kelley would answer the question.
  16. STFU.
  17. About the same as when they dropped the nickname.
  18. Who said anything about owing? Acting like one of the many programs on campus is too much to ask? Why can they do whatever the hell they want?
  19. LOL - yah right. They have really shown they care about the rest of campus.
  20. That all comes back to their leadership. Is Brad Berry going to be the only coach on campus who fights the process by not supporting it? Thus, leading his players and their fan base to do the same? I think we can all agree: If Berry were to come out and state that he and his program are behind the nickname process and want what's best for the university-as his SID pointed out yesterday- the rest of the players and fan base would follow suit.
  21. Lowell didn't go along with it. He was one of the four. More misinformation.
  22. Majority of ex-hockey players and some hockey fans.
  23. This ^^^^. Twitter proved that.
  24. Yes. Did Caggiula and Chyzk? They seem to pretty loud right now.
×
×
  • Create New...