and EIU did? Or UNH? That is the issue, UND's "opponents" in this match didn't do anything more than they did on paper so why did they get in? Nobody can give an answer, including the chairman.
In pretty much everyone's opinion who has actually looked at the resume's. Wilson couldn't even defend EIU without saying "good losses". That is all that needs to be said.
You have no clue. You are so hung up on 1 bad loss, one. The rest of the losses are to winning or .500 teams. You completely ignore PSU win and Wyoming win. Committee won't even care about that loss after seeing rest of the schedule. Oh, and Simple Rating System. Heard of it?
What was there best win? UND's look pretty good compared to most 7-4 teams right now, with Montana having as good of wins. A big win, or two in UND's case, are way more important than a bad loss.