siouxweet

I'm guessing #4.

right on. last I checked there were different definitions of the word gay without them even referring to sexuality. the term has several slang meanings as well without referring to sexuality with one of them being something is lame. you could probably dig pretty deep and find several instances over the years since the creation of siouxsports.com where someone has said something was gay on this board without it referring to sexuality.

you forgot about the NBA.

they did the gf series, it was two other bafoons in denver. on a sidenote I think derek and marco did a decent job that series. I wouldn't mind seeing these two here as I think they would do a decent job because if they don't derek might not get to ref in the ncaa's.

Thanks , I was almost thinking USCHO had taken over this site.

yeah so essentially you are paying $668 for the parking pass and I wouldn't consider those the best seats in the house.

they changed this a couple of years a go for reasons like this. as there were comparisons being lost because team a would play 20 TUC games and say have a winning perctg. of .680 and team b woould play one game and be 1-0 and get that point. they wanted to make it a little fairer. even if UND were to sweep this weekend odds are minnesota would still remain a TUC becaue they have a decent enough rpi and would take that huge of a hit.

DU and miami yes are unflippable however wisc still could be with good fortune. I think if we could sweep this weekend and wisc lose one and we end up playing wisc at the final five and beat them that could be enough to flip it. for us.

just cheer for team in red to lose today.

nope. the only ones left we can realisticly flip are alaska, bc and an extreme outside shot at wisc.

not next year.

I agree for what it is worth I like the pairwise system. it does have its flaws but by and large teams know where they are at and there isn't too much complaining at the end of the who of who should have or shouldn't have gotten in like BB. the only complaining is from fans about where they were or weren't sent.

yes everything through the final five counts.

also there was no hextall or knight as well that series.

uaa over duluth msum over scsu(this helps in the wcha and in the pairwise) nationally unh over bc merrimack over providence umass losing to whoever they play

I'll take a couple of solid 4-2 wins and lets move on.

your logic is very sound, no disagreement. but to pin our third place hopes on a msum team sweeping the huskies I wouldn't bet on it plus having to hope duluth loses one to uaa that's a lot of counting on crappy teams to help us out.

4th is the best we'll finish as there is no way msum will sweep the huskies.

I was wrong on my orig post I thought you were asking about und. but I changed it and I think it was woog's last year.

woog's last year I think.

du,miami, and wisc comparisons are unflippable. bc,alaska and scsu can still be flipped. help needed to flip those: merrimack to become a TUC, BC to have less than a split this weekend against UNH, scsu to lose this weekend or next weekend and alaska to lose a couple of TUC games or to miami at the CCHA tournament(finishing third in the WCHA and playing and sweeping UAA would flip this as well).

hopefully we just weathered the storm and can play sioux hockey the last two periods.

du,miami,wisc and scsu are pretty much unflippable. the highest we would be able to get is 19 comparisons which would be 5th or 6th. edit- our 0-4 against DU is killing us in several comparisons(mainly uno and bc) so playing them at the final five and beating would be a help.

unfortunatley I don't think either will happen. however the last time we finished fifth and had to play the play in game we ended up going to the nat. champ game, maybe history will repeat itself.

beings our track record in cc isn't the greatest, I'm hoping for a split and will be happy.