-
Posts
1,382 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Everything posted by airmail
-
I have to ask... is this really happening? If so, well done by the REA staff. (or to whomever the credit belongs) If not, shoulda woulda coulda, and fun thread anyway.
-
Exactly... my impressions too. The tire and the hot rod flames. A riot in the 60s? Fires in the 80s? This was really your first impression?
-
So that's why we haven't won a championship since 2000. Cheer karma must be bad.
-
Isn't Kent Hrbek that fat guy with the fishing show?
-
Massive post count instant credibility aside, I agree with Sicatoka. The game wasn't "in hand" at half time. I'll concede that we probably could have and would have won had Chapel been pulled, but Winona or not... this is the playoffs. Strange things can and do happen, and you don't leave room for another team's lucky break to end your season. It's easy for us to say that he did the wrong thing by leaving him in, now that we know the outcome. A coach in the middle of the game with the season on the line doesn't have that luxury. I agree with SiouxMD also. This might be a time where we see an unsung hero step up big. You can't replace a Ryan Chapel, but all hope is not lost. We have a good coach who will come up with a game plan that will give us a chance to win. That isn't a question.
-
I always liked Goehring's helmet.
-
Read this Blog article about this loser from tech
airmail replied to proudsioux's topic in Men's Hockey
That is true evil right there....... -
What I would tell you is to start a "great job thread" for TJ's hat trick, if you believe it is due. (probably is, actually) But don't take anything away from another fan that started a thread for Forney, because in their eyes, they thought it was due.
-
I voted with try for three years, but in actuality, I can see only two years or so. If nothing happens after two years, we have to get our poop in a group and start working towards a change. My 8 year old happened to catch the news last night, and was dumbfounded about why "the Native Americans don't like the Fighting Sioux name." I told him, objectively as possible, that some Native Americans don't think it is nice to them, and they think the name and logo make fun of them. His response was, "Dad... it's a nice picture. It's not making fun of them." Innocent, truthful words that will remain unheard, I'm afraid. Who knows what will happen over the course of a couple of years. I would guess Spirit Lake might give the okay, while Standing Rock will not. I am surpised at one thing: In various interviews with Native Americans, I saw that one wish is to bring publicity to the tribe. If that is truly a goal of the tribes, I think UND can help there... bringing me to vote in this poll as I did. On the flip side, another interview request I saw was to be given hockey game tickets. So that says, at least to me, these folks have something we want... and they can name the price. American economics at its finest. I see a light at the end of the tunnel, but it just might be a freight train coming to run our asses over.
-
The fact that this was even said reeks of insecurity and small genitals syndrome. What a waste of air time. Hakstol should write a letter to KBRR, thanking them for taking the "ND popularity target" of his team's back.
-
Fighting Sioux pride at it's highest peak with players and fans?
airmail replied to 01grad's topic in Men's Hockey
Tool. -
Archie and Eades would kick Panzer's and Bochenski's butts if the game was on the line... Seriously, I don't know if it would be terribly lopsided. Take a look at some of the 80s players that still skate: Archibald, Eades, Berry, Hrkac, Kidd, Belfour... WOW! I'd bet a couple dollars that the game wouldn't be a blow-out... and the old guys will likely have Gino coaching them! Suddenly, I'm really excited for a game that never will probably happen. It would be one helluva charity fundraiser, that's for sure.
-
Bumped up as the results are in... (I see at least 2 SiouxSports.com posters got in)
-
You guys are all taking the topic way out of context. There is a way to state and argue your opinion on a topic using the facts at hand and keeping personality out of it. Why does everything have to turn into a damn moral standards debate lately? Jeez.
-
*attempting to push, pull and drag the thread back to topic* Someone please explain how removing a folding knife from the apartment of a comparatively mature UND student will help prevent another Virginia Tech event? The fact is, it will not. While well intended, this proposal reaches a bit far and will not become policy... at least in its current form.
-
Which is my point... for the families living in the student apartments, that is their home. The University should respect their home, and not be nitpicking their legal possessions. FYI Shooting a 10 point buck drinking out of the English Coulee at UND would be a violation of ND G&F hunting laws.
-
I agree we are fortunate, and I also agree that VT never saw it coming. My question, then, would be how far do we go? Do we outlaw firearms within city limits? Do we outlaw automobiles as they have caused tragic deaths over and over again? A year or two ago, a woman was stabbed in the restaurant she worked in by a man who used a knife from that very kitchen. Should we then close all of the restaurants in Grand Forks? If we govern with hypothetical situations, than we are forced to police hypothetically. The above absurd suggestions are showing just that. I can see that you are passionate about the proactive protection of the public, which is certainly admirable. I still maintain, however, that this proposal will do nothing to perpetuate or prevent a tragedy. I was just thinking, how are they proposing to police this? Nightly weapons checks? Cutting open the bed pillows looking for cold steel contraband? My guess would be no accountability whatsoever, which makes the whole proposal a mute point.
-
I do not want to come across like a big 2nd Amendment apologist, because I simply am not. Rather, I consider myself a sportsman, and that's where my points are drawn. If you ask if .357 snub nosed revolvers should be the norm on campus property, I would certainly disagree. I think it is important, however, to point out that the proposal is targeted towards campus apartments. Someone please tell me if this is incorrect, but wouldn't that also include married student housing? I have a hard time digesting that gun control would be mandated against married adults, who likely would use firearms in a cautious and responsible manner. Further, even in the Single Student Apartments a minimum age of 23 or adequate credit hours are required to be eligible. Seemingly, these young adults would also seem the type that could handle firearm responsibility. What I think is even more foolish is the portion of the proposal that bans knives. Suppose I'm married, have two children, am taking a graduate course at UND while working to support my family in the evening... and yet I cannot be trusted with a 4" folding buck knife? The 2nd Amendment will get its glory during this debate, but in my opinion falls to the debate of general common sense. I find it interesting that in all the years of campus apartment living that were not protected by this proposal, we haven't heard of or witnessed any of the tragic events that are being discussed in this thread. Perhaps we just got lucky.
-
I believe that there are some instances that would be harmless, and are negatively affected by this proposal. For example, I recall a roomate of mine bringing his shotgun to school so that we could hunt together on the weekends. (seems to me he had a "knife not for cooking purposes" as well) I do not see one thing wrong with that. Let's be honest with each other and acknowledge what I believe to be fact: If some idiot wants to go on a shooting rampage, he or she will; plain and simple. They will access a weapon from somewhere, whether near or far. Access to a firearm doesn't convince a mentally unstable person to start shooting classmates. Mental instability convinces a person to start shooting classmates.
-
Yeah... I guess I did know that.
-
This statement got me thinking... who were recent past winners of the ironman competition? (I'm not trying to set you up; just wondering if there's a correlation between being ultra prepared for the season, and game performance throughout said season)
-
That's fine... but for this little meaningless poll, would it really hurt too much to just play along?
-
Since the conversation was introduced in the "Why Minnesota Sucks" (paraphrasing a bit) thread; here's something a bit more positive that we can try to turn negative.
-
New Director of Athletics at NDSU?
-
Just announced on KFGO, TB is taking a "leave of absence"... no further comment from UND.