burd

Hopefully the Marvin family will be of some help.

Yet, on none of these broadcasts have I seen anything as unique/special/weird and oddly fun as Hammer. Edit: Maybe include “out of place.”

Mahomes-like talent.

Hopefully. He's a Danny Kristo with Andrew Kozek's shot.

Omaha hounds the puck really well, and they seem well coached. If our guys give up many unforced turnovers or if DeRidder isn't sharp, UNO advances. Just not much margin for error with this team. The good news is that we won't lose unless it's the refs' fault.

I was gonna say. Everybody's picking UND to move on. What do people really think?

That is a far more useful metric than asking how many banners he's won, IMO.

On a marginally related matter: Jandric has really been good this year.

Because that floozy Denver played fast and loose and caught his eye.

The passing on the defensive side of the ice last night was a real head-shaker (this late in the season). UNO does a good job hounding the puck, but a lot of turnovers were unforced errors. It's not just the D-men. When this season began, it looked like passing might be a strong suit, but that, combined with soft goaltending, has been a glaring weakness.

With last night’s win I can just taste #9.

DeRidder has done a much better job of gobbling up pucks lately.

Too many on this team tend to coast to loose pucks.

UNO playing like a very well coached team. They cover so well, not giving up a lot of time and space.

And, as always, call your mother. Text her?

Immature

I recall a recent series in Omaha when he was unimpressive--last year possibly. Unimpressive with attitude.

Are there such things as x-rated goals and sports drinks? I'd probably be interested. edit: For a friend.

I don’t know what xG means

What about the FFS level UND often plays at?

Yeah, but if they REALLY sweep them this weekend and then REALLY sweep the following weekend? We're UND, fcs.

Wear do they play this weekend?

I should clarirfy--or qualilfy--that post. You are a committed and long-time Sioux hockey fan, which is a very good thing. You have a sense of humor, which is always appreciated, especially during frustrating times. I often seem sarcastic about things you post, but I'll readily concede that you know more about the Sioux hockey program than i do, so take anything I say with a big grain of salt. Which I'm sure you do without my encouragement.

What are “the old days,” exactly? All of the 70s? The years from ‘88 to ‘96? ALL of the Hakstol years when they nearly always made the tourney but many, including you, continually called for his dismissal because he couldn’t win the last game?

Now that's a mitey good solution.