homer

I don't know if we get Hooker to commit to UND with having around 15 offers by telling him he'll redshirt. If he is a capable shooting/point guard Webb and Anderson will not need to play 35 minutes a game.

I think we all just have our popcorn out and are watching everything unfold.

Now we'll see what happens. I don't think any school was going to admit they are interested in the MVC until the conference was looking for a team or teams.

I wish we knew more about Jones' recruiting plan for the next two seasons. With the number of scholorships we have available, I would think we would have heard a little more.

I'm going with Hooker. I think next year he gets valuable playing time at the 1 and 2. If we can somewhat follow what SDSU did with Wolters and surround him with a couple bigs but more importantly some shooters, he seems like the type of player who could be ready to carry a team his sophmore-senior year. I'm excited to get him on campus.

We have to stay healthy next season. I think Traylor needs to get his grades in order. We need a true 4 next year. Our best lineup last night was when Brekke and Wilmer played together. It would be nice to have someone a little more athletic at the 4. Hard not to be excited about what we have coming back and be really excited about what we are adding.

Tough final possession. Good effort by the guys but we let that one slip away.

Do we go for the win or the tie?

Webb with a couple bad possessions. Need a stop.

That 3 attempt by Webb was not needed. That was a couple steps behind NBA range.

This ^^^^ Having him out for 10+ games really hurt. He is makin a difference tonight.

10 minute game now

Keep moving the ball. Things will come back around. Can't give up the 2nd chances.

We have to get back to ball movement. Starting to play one on one and Weber is making a run.

Looking forward to the game tonight. Maybe we're peaking at the right time now that we are healthy. Move the ball and carry over the team play from the second half yesterday and we'll have a chance.

We need a few to step up in the secondarty this year. Hopefully Javen can be one of those guys. I think we were all pretty excited when he signed a few years ago.

Denver hasn't started play in the Summit yet. I don't see them telling Douple that they are interested in the MVC and gone if they get an offer. That would sure make it awkward if an offer never came. But than again, Oakland has been pretty up front for years that they have one foot out the door and are just waiting for the offer.

Beating either Weber or Montana for the first time this season will be a tall task. Either way, its looking like the tourney will be the first time we have been even close to 100% healthy all season so that should not hurt. Hopefully either (or both) of those teams see a different UND team than they saw both times earlier this season.

Every coach on campus, minus the hockey coach said the Sioux nickname was affecting their recruiting prior to last season. We are now over half way through the athletic year and at some point during each of the respective seasons have complained about the talent level, either as a whole or at specific positions of the major programs, minus hockey. I don't know if its a coincidence or not. All I know is that when Roebuck left, he didn't exactly leave the cupboards full for his replacement.

I could see the backfill of the Atlantic 10 affecting the Horizon. This could get Oakland into that league.

He'll be a boost to U of Mont. next season. He's a heck of a QB.

I have a ton of respect for Coach Roebuck but this program was already downhill when he left. I am not willing to jump on Brewster for the lack of talent on this team. We would be no better off if Gene was still coaching than we are right now. Only difference would be that two players who were recruited by Roebuck and have shown are not impact D1 players may still be on the team.

If the Summit loses one or two they are in troube. I don't see your favorite team being one of those two either.

I live in Fargo and there are many in town who think the recent flood talk is centered around keeping the diversion relevant. Two dry springs in a row would make it pretty tough to justify spending $1 billion on the project. I look at my neighborhood and drive south of Fargo and the snow levels are no where near two years ago. I know all it takes is a couple real big March snow storms and a quick thaw to change all that though so I'll keep my fingers crossed..

Do you want them to do Phase 2 first?