The Sicatoka

See Commandment Two of the "Ten Commandments of SPECWAR" per Richard (nmn) Marcinko, LCDR, USN (Ret).

I'd suspect using this reference, that any school listed that changed on or after 2005 fits your category. Namely, Chowam Hawks – formerly Braves (2006) IUP Crimson Hawks – formerly Indians (2006), their process notes Louisiana-Monroe Warhawks – formerly Indians (2006), their process notes Southeast Missouri State Redhawks – formerly Indians and Otahkians (2005) Stonehill Skyhawks – formerly Chieftains (2005) Not in the list of < adjective > Hawks would be: Arkansas State Red Wolves - formerly Indians (2008), their process is noted here. Basically, those folks sucked it up and got it done. Meanwhile, we're still wallowing a decade later. PS - I'll be sending you a bill for this brief at the rates you normally bill. And that's a price discount being given by me.

My guess? Same as if the nickname hadn't changed (up to and including the NCAA sending their "best scheduling practices" recommendations out again to NCAA schools and conferences as they've done in the past).

A poster here named "Rick" would be so proud of you, but he's still looking for Norwegian Student Services on campus.

The Cs and As and goalie from both sides like up on respective blue lines and ... "Let's play 'The Family Feud'!"

Don't tell me you're going for the look "DaveK" favors ... the oversized shoulder pads and draping sleeves circa 1980 ... which is something akin to this: PS - I'm just pokin' some fun at you and DaveK. PPS - Only a few of us know who that is or the skit.

Captains. Center ice. Three two-minute rounds. Ten point must system. Why not? Makes as much sense as the other options.

From which direction? The unhappy side will always make those claims.

Interesting, but what do "Danes and Fins in Meteorology and Aerospace" or "Somalis in Poly Sci" think about UND? If we're interested in American Indian opinions, shouldn't we be interested in them all?

Is that a faint pattern on the green jersey or are we seeing through to the pads underneath? And looking at that shoulder mark, I think dagies should be mad that "Black Stripes" didn't make the final cut. PS - Where's our resident uniform critiquer's take? Paging Mr. MafiaMan ...

I'll agree with you on the sugar. I'm really watching that (and carbs). But all meats have to be processed at some level because I'm not eating an entire dead animal.

Touche. < tips cap to SW >

What catches my eye (in that article from 2012 about Idaho) is ... where are the extra 4000 seats they said they'd be adding to Kibbie Dome? It's still at 16000 from everything I see.

I haven't had a pocket watch since I stopped wearing three-piece suits. ... What's that? ... "Crockett"? ... Nevermind ...

The "death penalty" is a by-sport penalty (see: SMU football). What do you hit with that at UNC? The issues seem athletic department wide. RE: Penn State - I never understood why the NCAA got involved in that one. That was a criminal matter. I would have liked to have seen a few more PSU officials in handcuffs for conspiracy (the cover-up of the crime).

You're right. The bluff is by the "no nickname" folks: We're fine without a nickname (but we'll keep wearing the old nickname). The NCAA (per Goon, and now GFH) seems more than willing to call that bluff with their "no nickname is fine if you're serious; but, if we hear complaints about hearing too much of the old nickname we're coming back at you" stance. I'm willing to say the NCAA is not bluffing on that. Why? It's the same approach they took last time, namely, you can have any nickname you want, but if it's the wrong one in our minds we're coming at you.

Last time UND tried to call the NCAA's bluff, UND lost a nickname and as a bonus the NCAA Executive Committee got a whole new set of powers to make up stuff as they go.

Californians? No. The folks at the table opposite the NCAA were the folks from the Spirit Lake Committee for Understanding and Respect. Now unless Spirit Lake Nation moved and nobody told me ... As far as the pipe ceremony, Judge Erickson gave it all the weight he could.

The free speech aspect of this is a non-starter. The NCAA is a private club. They can make up "club rules" as they go, and as a private (not public) entity they are not bound by the First Amendment.

If it wasn't them, who was sitting at that table in Federal Judge Erickson's court room? Sure looked like Archie and Eunice. Thank you for the offer, but I don't need your book. I watched the procedings in person in the court room. Judge Erickson ruled that they have no standing in the relationship between the NCAA and UND. You could see (UND graduate) Judge Erickson had sympathy for them and some concern about the "prudence" of the NCAA policy, but he also stated even if they had standing much of their case would struggle to show merit. Google: Sioux NCAA Judge Erickson

They are selling hope. See: 24 team playoff.

sky: You claim purposely. I say Freudian.

The "silenced" folks lost in Federal court. There's not a lot to say after that.

There's the conundrum: If there is a even just modicum of truth in what Goon was told, sure, "no nickname" may win, but your closing quip may have us losing in the end with the NCAA. (Your closing shows what the "no nickname" point of view is really thinking.) I personally don't want to see even the possibility of another bout with the NCAA. I'm pushing 30 years watching this quagmire (starting with a donation to refurbish parts of the old REA in the late 1980s) and it needs to reach a conclusion.

I'd say funding for this phase, as built, wasn't a problem. Evidence? The State doesn't let you build unless you have the funding in hand for what you are proposing to build. Have some things been shifted from Phase One to Phase Two? Most assuredly. However, ... big honkin' building ... check100 yard football field ... check8 lane track ... checkspace in place for future contingencies (i.e. Phase Two) ... checkHonestly, for a "training facility" that's a pretty solid and important start.