Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

The Sicatoka

Moderators
  • Posts

    37,094
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    578

Everything posted by The Sicatoka

  1. I'm pretty sure there's a long list of things you'd do for 40 bucks.
  2. I wouldn't even call it xenophobic. I'd say that most consultants only know the "coast" mindset and don't know much at all about us out here in "fly over territory". They bring what they know with them and it doesn't align to us. Not xenophobic, just different bases of experience that we work from (that sometimes clash).
  3. FYP.
  4. (Not aimed at you yzer ... but) .... And there it it. Long ago, when it was clear the old name had been lost, I said (ad infinitum, ad nauseum) that those of us who do care need to "control what is ours to control". The sentiment in yzer's post is exactly what I feared. The powers that be (see: Kelley) beat us into process-committee-process submission so they could feed us pablum (see: inoffensive "adjective birds" or not-a-word, no real meaning, postal abbreviations) and prove their "superiority" by not even following their own processes. And that's why I say Roughriders. It's not academic-approved pablum.
  5. So what you're kinda saying is ... Q: Why not? A: Minot
  6. Allow, indulge, me one more: I am NOT going to adjust my expectation that the fumbles must stop (recovered or given away). It takes a down away from an already questionable offense.
  7. KnightRiders. It's what the shared girls hockey team is called. < cue the music >
  8. My problem with "Nodaks" is this: it's an obsolete postal abbreviation. It's neither imaginative nor creative.
  9. OK, so I'm not the only one wondering ...
  10. I know how I voted. (Anyone can do a quick search and figure it out here.) But right now my biggest issue is not which name comes out of it but how it comes out of it; specifically, ... The process for voting was announced before the round of five. To change it after that is at best arbitrary and capricious, and at worst manipulative and conspiratorial.
  11. Why not take the Minot solution - they have grades 9 and 10 downtown and grades 11 and 12 at "Magic City". Just be "Grand Forks" with 9th and 10th grade at Central Campus (downtown) and 11th and 12th grades at Red River Campus. Based on the GFH story, there are 2087 (937 GFC, 1150 GFRR) between the two schools. That's about the same number (2100) that is listed for Minot High. The theory follows in that Minot also has (private, Catholic) Minot Ryan where GF has (yes, East Grand Forks, private, Cathlic) Sacred Heart. The difference is that there is EGF public there also.
  12. You mention Badger you get the obligatory ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7txPU6efos
  13. Quite honestly, do we have an FCS QB in the stable today? Studsrud has an average release at best (not fast, not slow) and is consistently throwing a step behind receivers. What makes him passable is his mobility. Bartles? I think he got his windup from Hideo Nomo. It's way to long from decision to release. Add in lack of mobility, that spring in the first step to allow escape, and it's a problem. Mollberg hasn't seen the field since his Achilles injury. To me that is telling in itself. Heidelbaugh, the kid from Rugby, has the current generation QB size (6'5") and good mobility for ND HS FB, but do we know if he has the arm, release, 'head' and ability for FCS?
  14. We knew (probably didn't want to admit it to ourselves) that we were one deep at many positions. Many positions. And of course, those are the spots we took injuries. More importantly, there is first line talent there. What is missing is that next tier, the ability to not see a significant drop off when the injuries happen. 4-1, lose the starting QB and both starting safeties, plus a bunch of other important guys (primarily LBs and OLs), 4-4.
  15. What's longer: the two-deep or the injury report.
  16. These two three finalist hi-jinx leaves Kelley and his minions (co-conspirators?) open to such theories and acusations.
  17. That almost sounds naughty.
  18. I recently chatted with someone who is reasonably familiar with Twamley. Their take: There's no point in defining a process if you're simply going to ignore it. Kelley's just doing what he always does: Manipulating the situation in an attempt to get the outcome he desires. Anyone who thinks otherwise hasn't been paying attention.
  19. An original plains Roughrider ... with feathers.
  20. What happens when in this farcical three-way race the top two are within 126 votes of each other and none has a majority. They've dug themselves quite a hole. Top two. Vote. Done.
  21. They've dug themselves quite a hole, haven't they. Imagine the top two (of three) within 126 votes ... and no majority.
  22. That defines arbitrary and capricious. You don't trust organizations that behave in that manner (cough - NCAA - cough). And that is why Twamley must go back to the voting process as originally defined.
  23. I'd say he's clear to do that until the next "here's your link to vote" email goes out.
  24. Just over half of eligible US voters show up for a Presidential election. For state and local elections (no Presidential ballot) it drops markedly, like into the territory of this turnout.
  25. And a bird in a head dress is better.
×
×
  • Create New...