PCM Posted November 9, 2006 Posted November 9, 2006 What time does the hearing start today? 10 a.m. Now it's looking like I won't be there. I've been fighting a cold for the last few weeks. I thought I was getting better, but I woke up this morning feeling awful. Damn. Quote
Siouxmama Posted November 9, 2006 Posted November 9, 2006 10 a.m. Now it's looking like I won't be there. I've been fighting a cold for the last few weeks. I thought I was getting better, but I woke up this morning feeling awful. Damn. Zinc. Zinc. And more Zinc! OR...you could go with my Uncle's remedy. Hot Blackberry Brandy. Quote
Smoggy Posted November 9, 2006 Posted November 9, 2006 Zinc. Zinc. And more Zinc! OR...you could go with my Uncle's remedy. Hot Blackberry Brandy. Screwdrivers work everytime. I suppose I could just drink the OJ, but that's not fun. Quote
ScottM Posted November 9, 2006 Posted November 9, 2006 Black Berry Brandy works better. Meh. I recommend at least one bottle of tequila. You'll either sweat the cold right out your system, or be so hungover you'll forget you have a cold. Quote
siouxforeverbaby Posted November 10, 2006 Posted November 10, 2006 anyone know what happened in court yesterday? or are we still waiting to see? Quote
mksioux Posted November 13, 2006 Posted November 13, 2006 Here is the Injunction Order: http://www.ag.state.nd.us/NCAA/MemorandumD...yInjunction.pdf Quote
mksioux Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 Looks like the parties had a telephone conference with the Judge and they pushed the trial date back to December 2007. UND v. NCAA: Dec. '07 Quote
Tommiejo Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 Looks like the parties had a telephone conference with the Judge and they pushed the trial date back to December 2007. UND v. NCAA: Dec. '07 First, mksioux thanks for the information on this latest development. Second, as I readed the article in the Herald (I think I spell that right if not please forgive me for my lousy spelling.) The judge suggest to me was an idea of a out of court settlement. Hey that's how I see it. My spin on that is simple. NO. The day UND & the NCAA reach a settlement is when hell freezes over & the devil goes ice skating. After all let's agree on one thing the NCAA wouldn't know the truth even if they were standing in a fresh pile of it. GO GATORS CHOMP ON OHIO STATE ON JAN 8. SIOUX FAN SINCE 1973 Quote
mksioux Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 First, mksioux thanks for the information on this latest development. Second, as I readed the article in the Herald (I think I spell that right if not please forgive me for my lousy spelling.) The judge suggest to me was an idea of a out of court settlement. Hey that's how I see it. My spin on that is simple. NO. The day UND & the NCAA reach a settlement is when hell freezes over & the devil goes ice skating. After all let's agree on one thing the NCAA wouldn't know the truth even if they were standing in a fresh pile of it. GO GATORS CHOMP ON OHIO STATE ON JAN 8. SIOUX FAN SINCE 1973 I wouldn't read too much into the settlement comments. Judges encourage settlement in nearly every lawsuit. In Minnesota, it is mandatory (with a few exceptions) for the parties to engage in alternative dispute resolution before the case can go to trial. I'm not sure if North Dakota has the same rule though. Quote
BigGreyAnt41 Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 Found this on the front page of MSNBC.com http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16238546/ Quote
Sioux-cia Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 Found this on the front page of MSNBC.com http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16238546/ The only compromise is for the NC$$ to recognize that they are not the social conscience for colleges, athletes and fans. God gave us free will and the First Amendment gave us freedom of speech. If you choose to be offended by words and pictures, that's your choice. If we want to use a particular name and logo, the constitution gives us that right. Jahnke said he does not believe either side wants a trial, and suggested they consider changing the logo or nickname in a way acceptable to both. NO F'ING WAY! Quote
Tommiejo Posted December 17, 2006 Posted December 17, 2006 The only compromise is for the NC$$ to recognize that they are not the social conscience for colleges, athletes and fans. God gave us free will and the First Amendment gave us freedom of speech. If you choose to be offended by words and pictures, that's your choice. If we want to use a particular name and logo, the constitution gives us that right. NO F'ING WAY! I agree with that 100%. Furthermore like I said befor & I'll say it again. The day both sides have an out of court settlement is when hell freezes over & the devil goes ice skating. That's the only way. Let's face it thing is going to trial in Dec 07. You can take that to the bank. GO GATORS CHOMP ON OHIO STATE. SIOUX FAN SINCE 1973. Quote
Goon Posted December 17, 2006 Posted December 17, 2006 NO F'ING WAY! How do we say this the NCAA can go pound sand as far as I am concerned. Quote
Tommiejo Posted December 17, 2006 Posted December 17, 2006 How do we say this the NCAA can go pound sand as far as I am concerned. Good question Goon, now if I only knew the answer to that one. Furthermore that makes two of us asking the same question. GO GATORS CHOMP ON OHIO STATE ON JAN 8. SIOUX FAN SINCE 1973. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.