HockeyMom Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux-cia Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 On WDAZ 10p news, Spirit Lake MIGHT meet with Kup next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 From USA Today: N. Dakota at center of 'hostile' debate For some, The Ralph is a wonderful gift from a loyal benefactor who believed strongly in the "Fighting Sioux" spirit of teamwork and tradition. But for those on the other side of the debate about the proper use of American Indian symbols and names, the arena is a citadel of hate and intolerance.Lucy Ganje, a member of the art department faculty, displays several T-shirts that were worn on campus by both UND supporters and fans from rival schools. A shirt for supporters shows a crude caricature of a male Indian having sexual relations with a bison, the symbol of archrival North Dakota State University. An NDSU shirt counters with an even more obscene sexual scene involving an Indian cartoon character and a bison. "Native people won't go to sporting events because their families, their children, are exposed to these things," Ganje says. "The university just tells them to turn the shirts inside-out, but once they get to their seats, they turn them out again." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwing77 Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 From USA Today: N. Dakota at center of 'hostile' debate <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Very interesting. Have you ever seen any of these T Shirts? I've never seen them at Hockey events but I admit I haven't been to many basketball and football events to make a judgement. EDIT: Have to add this: Isn't it funny that, instead of installing a rule that bans those things from the event, they just want to change the name instead? Do they understand that PEOPLE do those things and not a NAME? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mksioux Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 The reporter -- for some perspective -- would have pressed Ganje as to the dates the shirts were confiscated. I bet most are 10 years old or older. The same exact issue came up at Moorhead State about 10 years ago with a tee-shirt depicting a Dragon having sexual relations with a Cobber cheerleader. That kind of juvenile idiocy has nothing to do with the Sioux nickname. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Have you ever seen any of these T Shirts? Given the fact that it's been many decades since UND played NDSU in hockey, I doubt that you've ever seen them inside the Ralph. This article slanders UND and the citizens of Grand Forks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 The most hurtful comments at American Indian students are the taunts of "Prairie N Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I haven't seen one of those bright yellow shirts since before I went to college. That was a few years back. AND I do seem to recall seeing NDSU SUCKS t's somewhere along the line also. In fact, I think I still own one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Here's the e-mail address for letters to the editor at USA Today: editor@usatoday.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 From today's Grand Forks Herald: UND NICKNAME: NCAA wants a clear stance The NCAA says it's getting mixed signals from one of three North Dakota Sioux Indian nations regarding its stand on UND's Fighting Sioux nickname and Indian-head logo. Bob Williams, NCAA spokesman, said that the Spirit Lake Nation near Devils Lake, as of late Tuesday, had not responded to the association's calls for clarification. "Really, what we would like to do is get an official position from the Spirit Lake tribe, and we've attempted to do that for the last several weeks," Williams said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Yes, and I'm sure you've heard those comments only at UND. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd like to hear other people's experiences with the term "prairie n______." I grew up in South Dakota, a state with a large American Indian population in a town with a significant number of American Indians. I lived in Bismarck for 15 years before moving to Grand Forks in 1992. Until I came to Grand Forks, I'd never heard anyone refer to Native Americans by this term. What's even more interesting is that the only time I hear the term used now is when the change-the-name crowd complains about others using it. So what's going on? Do I live a sheltered life? Don't I get out enough? Am I hanging out with the wrong crowd? Is it simply a lucky coincidence that I've never heard anyone other than the anti-Sioux forces use it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyMom Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 The first time I ever heard it was when it was used in an example on this board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 From today's Grand Forks Herald: UND NICKNAME: NCAA wants a clear stance I think Kupchella provided them with documentation of an "official position" did he not? Sounds to me like the NCAA is frustrated with Spirit Lake as well. They're not getting what they wanted, and what they so desperately need....Spirit Lake's revocation of support. Spirit Lake is tired of GrahamKracker, UND, and the NCAA all busting their chops for not throwing support in whichever direction. If ever I would feel empathy for a group just going turtle and ignoring the rest of the world, it's the SL tribe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Spirit Lake is tired of GrahamKracker, UND, and the NCAA all busting their chops for not throwing support in whichever direction. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think you're right, except for the UND part. I doubt that the university is doing much, if any, lobbying of the tribe. I suspect that the vast majority of the pressure is coming from the other side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I'd like to hear other people's experiences with the term "prairie n______." <{POST_SNAPBACK}> First time, and probably only time, I heard it was in NW NoDak by the younger brother of my college room mate to describe some people from the Fort Berthold reservation. I don't recall ever hearing it on campus. As a matter of fact, I don't recall any conversations centering around "new, creative" epithets for Indians, contrary to what Gange and Jeanotte might suggest. I heard more derogatory portrayals and comments about Indians when I moved to "enlightened, liberal" DT Mpls than when I was on campus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rochsioux Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I think Kupchella provided them with documentation of an "official position" did he not? Sounds to me like the NCAA is frustrated with Spirit Lake as well. They're not getting what they wanted, and what they so desperately need....Spirit Lake's revocation of support. Spirit Lake is tired of GrahamKracker, UND, and the NCAA all busting their chops for not throwing support in whichever direction. If ever I would feel empathy for a group just going turtle and ignoring the rest of the world, it's the SL tribe. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Could it be that the NC$$ is really looking for an "out" on this issue ? I am beginning to think they are hoping that Spirit Lake will restate their support for the name and logo use, then use that as justification for an exemption. They already have plenty of documented support against the name and logo from other tribes. Spirit Lake is the one that supported it back in 2000 but now is wavering and the NCAA knows that. They don't want to use the 2000 resolution knowing that discussions have taken place to revoke. They would again look like idiots if they gave UND the exemption based on the 2000 resolution only to have the tribe pull their support soon after. I am sure the NC$$ would like to avoid the courts on this issue so they need to know where Spirit Lake stands, they will decide the issue. If they come out and officially recind their support, based on the NC$$'s previous press releases I think they will have no choice but to deny UND the exemption. If Spirit Lake reaffirms their support, then the NC$$ can use this as justification to get them out of a court case. It appears the NC$$ is waiting on Spirit Lake prior to ruling on UND's petition. If Spirit Lake reaffirms their support and the NC$$ still denies the petition, then what was the point in waiting on Spirit Lake, they already had the 2000 resolution in hand that supported the name ? So I think that a new resolution will come from Spirit Lake and that will be the tipping point. Which way it goes is anyones guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux-cia Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 The first time I ever heard it was when it was used in an example on this board. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Me, too. I believe the reference was made by either Kracker or KnowFacts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottM Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Could it be that the NC$$ is really looking for an "out" on this issue ? I am beginning to think they are hoping that Spirit Lake will restate their support for the name and logo use, then use that as justification for an exemption. They already have plenty of documented support against the name and logo from other tribes. Spirit Lake is the one that supported it back in 2000 but now is wavering and the NCAA knows that. They don't want to use the 2000 resolution knowing that discussions have taken place to revoke. They would again look like idiots if they gave UND the exemption based on the 2000 resolution only to have the tribe pull their support soon after. And that is a perfect example of why the NC$$'s "logic" of using tribal support is so problematic, especially when tribes an Indians themselves can have differing views, contrary to what certain people may think. If the Utes or Seminoles decide they no longer support the schools' usage, can the NC$$ rescind their exemptions? Are the schools and the NC$$ leaving themselves hostage to changing tribal agendas, whims, mores, etc.? I agree the NC$$ is definitely looking to scrape away the paint they've taken into the corner with them. Frankly, the fact that the SL folks haven't yet come out and said anything, one way or another, demonstrates how divided Indians themselves are on the issue. If they renounce or reaffirm the 2000 resolution, who's to say the next leadership won't reverse it soon after. It's an idiotic way to support an idiotic policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I think you're right, except for the UND part. I doubt that the university is doing much, if any, lobbying of the tribe. I suspect that the vast majority of the pressure is coming from the other side. I think you're probably right. And maybe I should have stated it as people urging SL to support the nickname. I would guess the pressure from the "other" side is much greater, however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sioux7 Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Given the fact that it's been many decades since UND played NDSU in hockey, I doubt that you've ever seen them inside the Ralph. This article slanders UND and the citizens of Grand Forks. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I just love how reporting these days is soooo one sided.......on any issue where sides are taken. I have no problem with someone writing about the whole logo issue but TELL BOTH SIDES OF THE STORY. This is happening on every single article written on this. My favorite part of this is the quote of "only a little over 400 of the students are Native Americans" and the part about the young lady saying that the Native American people "have brought programs to the university" If I'm not mistaken, doesn't the university create the programs? PCM, you are correct. This is a classic case of slander. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Politics & Pressure Sorry to me this is reality ....I lost a Hundred dollars out there recently & that won't happen again if they recind the use of the name & I hope most folks from Grand Forks & UND supporters give them that message big time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmitzzz Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Politics & Pressure Sorry to me this is reality ....I lost a Hundred dollars out there recently & that won't happen again if they recind the use of the name & I hope most folks from Grand Forks & UND supporters give them that message big time <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't think issuing threats is the way to handle this. Native American's have been constantly threatend throughout the white man's occupation of this land. I think "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee" should be required reading of every freshman at UND. Perhaps this would help stilfe the feelings that threats are the only effective means to ones end... at least where it concerns the Native American's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fetch Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I don't think issuing threats is the way to handle this. Native American's have been constantly threatend throughout the white man's occupation of this land. I think "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee" should be required reading of every freshman at UND. Perhaps this would help stilfe the feelings that threats are the only effective means to ones end... at least where it concerns the Native American's. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It was not a threat - it was Reality as in Fact They don't support us - I will not support them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star2city Posted September 30, 2005 Author Share Posted September 30, 2005 N. Dakota to appeal ruling A followup article by the USA Today reporter who earlier painted UND and Grand Forks in unpleasant tones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejm Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Great quote from Pres. Kupchella: "The NCAA has so many issues," he said softly to a reporter. "Why this and why us?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.