Siouxphan27

UND 23 UW. 17

Five! Five lame choices! AH AH AH!

how about Muff Divers, Mough Divers, or Muffdivers? Who owns those?

The guy doesn't understand that the word "alumni" is plural. So not sure if it's worth wasting time trying to explain satire and other forms of humor to him.

Your local veterinarian, for about $150.

thanks for that link. looks like they have a lot of question marks, a lot of inexperienced starters, and are thin at some positions. and, Bohl keeps getting pudgier every year. play a disciplined game and hopefully we're in this at the end and can pull off the upset.

Congratulations- you are today's off on a tangent award winner!

In his statement, I assumed Roberto would've included something pertaining to these sanctions we heard about from an email that the NCAA might, could, possibly, maybe impose. If Roberto would've spent the last month communicating with the NCAA and told us as a result of those talks, we have to leave no name off the ballot, this would've gone over much better. Myself and probably 95% of the no name supporters would just say alright fine, let's choose one of the 5. but instead, Kelleys ineptitude shines thru once again.

Not so much a Trojan horse; rather, more of a Where the rubber meets the road statement of truth. :-)

Sometimes it's a good idea to use a Roughrider in a passionate situation. But other than that, all the choices pretty much fail those four bullet points miserably.

There may be a number of Fargo residents that feel a $3 donation is worth it to vote for the choice they deem the worst. IMO they should've said as of last Friday, if you've donated, you're eligible.

Lol well, just get Stenehjem to strike a sweet deal with the ncaa to get permission from the two nearest Hmong tribes.

Evidently. a few weeks ago Kelley announced he was still considering it.

Until there is an official announcement that the NCAA will not approve of it without threat of sanctions, no name is the best choice. hawks- sure north stars- fine nodaks- whatevs sundogs- uffda.... Ok I guess. roughriders- serenity now!

three words for you and a few of your friends: Lighten up, Francis.

Being both sides have now employed this tactic, I propose a compromise of the Fighting Fearmongerers.

yes Sic.... My opinion.... Imagine that- people posting their very own opinions on message boards.... Who woulda thunk it? Stay thirsty my friend.

exactly. you took the words right out of my keyboard.

Lol that. was. awesome!!!! no worries bud! poking fun is highly recommended! i'll get you back...just wait...

um, no.... I just attempted to inject a little lighthearted humor.

lol. the irony in your post makes me literally laugh out loud. have a good day my friend.

So you're pro- snide remarks, and anti- rally for the purpose of drumming up support? I wish the Presidential candidates shared your views on campaigning and rallies. It would save us from all the political ads, and we'd just go vote on election day.

We do not know for sure who will be eligible to vote. if it's open to everyone statewide, I would expect lots of Sundog support from the Fargo area. The fact of the matter is we just don't know. As to your second paragraph, myself and many others do not need to hear what the actual pick is; all 5 choices range from mediocre to atrocious. So why wait until after the fact and the name is selected and announced, to voice concerns. It would do no good at that point.

If you equally support all 5 names, I would agree with you. But it appears most that post on here have a favorite. So that is why I posed the question; where's the excitement, passion, etc., to support one of these "great" finalists? Wouldn't a rally be more constructive and productive than all the snide remarks (i'm not talking to you directly here) made at the expense of folks with a different point of view?

As many on here have stated, the final ballot will most likely not include 5 names. If there was any passion in support of one of the five finalists, one would think those supporters would be out and about campaigning and rallying to make sure their choice made the final ballot.