Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

fightingsioux4life

Members
  • Posts

    14,199
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Everything posted by fightingsioux4life

  1. So that is all you have? Cheap personal attacks on my loyalty to this school and all it's programs? Whatever floats your boat I guess.
  2. So there should be a quota for how many times one person can post on a topic? If people like yababy, Fetch, etc. can rant and rave about how bad having a different nickname is, then I should be able to rebut those arguments. Is that clear?
  3. So that means NDSU has been getting the commitments for this for awhile now. Which means UND is playing catch-up (again). I guess that is what I am sick and tired of, being one or two steps behind NDSU. If and when UND comes up with a plan to fund FCOA, I will give them all the props they deserve. Until then, I am in believe it when I see it mode.
  4. Well, considering the lack of leadership from this administration on pretty much everything, I am not as optimistic as you. I just think a public commitment to funding FCOA would help get the attention of alumni who are interested in keeping UND at the forefront of athletic excellence.
  5. Bottom line: If we don't do this for all sports, we might as well move back down to Division II and join the NSIC. It is as simple as that. This isn't going away and the longer we "stand pat", the worse it will be for our programs that don't involve skating on ice. NDSU will be able to throw the FCOA commitment to recruits after the regular season is done for football, basketball, volleyball, etc. Just how many recruiting battles will Bubba, Jones and Brewster win when the other three Dakota schools are doing this and we aren't? I think we all know the answer to that question. Kelley and Faison need to get on the horn with the UND Alumni Association and put together a professional, well thought-out fundraising drive to fund FCOA for all sports. The Champions Club has done great things for our programs and a new fundraising effort can do the same for FCOA. Like I have said before, it is time to either fish or cut bait. I say we fish.
  6. Okay, I'll give it a break if you also pledge to "give it a break". Oh, you don't want to stop posting on this topic? Then, no deal.
  7. I wasn't going to say anything else about it until homer responded to it. And besides, it's the truth and it is related to FCS football.
  8. Next season. That means it will start to impact recruiting as early as the end of this season.
  9. And thanks to UND dropping the ball on FCOA, we can look forward to more of that in the future. #epicfail
  10. Yeah, I missed that. I am honestly to the point where I am sick and stinking tired of all the nonsense swirling around this campus. The nickname issue, the FCOA issue, it's enough to drive me to drinking (and I don't drink at all). Potato Bowl can't come soon enough, when we can focus on something positive for a change.
  11. Just when you think this issue is going to be resolved in October, another bureaucrat breathes more life into it: https://sayanythingblog.com/entry/und-2/ And the key statement that tells you what Ms. Neset wants: In other words, Ms. Neset is going to order Kelley to put 'North Dakota' back on the list. I have a question for Ms. Neset: How many more "quick looks" do you need to give this issue? There have been literally years of "quick looks" given to this issue. A better idea is to have a "quick look" at Ms. Neset's qualifications (or lack thereof) to hold the job she holds on the SBoHE. And I mean every single word of that.
  12. That is the big question for the Twins. When Target Field opened up, the Pohlad family said this would give them the revenues they needed to hang onto players and thus be perennial contenders. That claim is going to be tested in the next couple of years as the team adds more and more young talent from the minors. The Pohlad's are out of alibis for letting players sign with other teams and then having those teams win championships with them (David Ortiz anyone?). When this team is a championship contender in a couple of years and it is time to lock down the cornerstones of the team for the future, it will be time to put up or shut up.
  13. The Grand Forks Heraldo's Editorial Board has weighed in on UND's epic fail with regard to FCOA. http://www.grandforksherald.com/opinion/our-opinion/3827868-our-opinion-stop-waiting-start-moving-sports-scholarships And Tom Dennis ends with what I have been harping on since this whole issue came up: I find myself either loving or hating what Dennis writes in these editorials. This time, I am firmly in the former category. It is time for UND to either fish or cut bait with regard to the Division I experiment. The choices before us have never been more clear.
  14. Good point. However, that is one of the biggest problems with Kelley. He wants everyone to like him and you can't do that and be an effective President of a campus like UND.
  15. I am also fed up with Faison's "hunky-dory" attitude towards everything (he waited way too long to fire Mussman for instance). And please, no more lectures on how Faison is great because of the IPF and getting into the Big Sky Conference. This disastrous non-decision on FCOA has the potential to wipe out any good he has done during his 6 years in Grand Forks and is the last straw for me. However, I maintain that the Buck stops in the Office of the President and that means who we hire to replace Kelley must have an understanding of the concept of athletics as being a vital component of any university campus in terms of marketing, exposure, positive press coverage, a source of alumni and community pride and support and so on. The new President's first order of business should be to call Faison into his office and wish him well on his future endeavors. Then after Faison has cleaned out his office, we can hire an AD that is on board with going all-in on athletics and not just being happy having the Division I label.
  16. Another example of what is wrong with UND athletics is illustrated by today's Grand Forks Heraldo headline: 'No Nickname' removed: Kelley leaves 'UND/North Dakota' option off ballot for October vote. So let me ask a very serious question right now: Which is more important to UND's present and future; this nickname business or the failure to fund FCOA for anything but hockey? The answer, in my opinion, is obvious. But it isn't obvious to the people in charge at Twamley Hall and Hyslop. And those are the people that need to get it through their thick skulls about how important it is for our coaches and players to be on a level playing field when it comes to resources. Otherwise, this whole move to Division I was a waste of time, money and effort. While NDSU focuses on a nationally televised game vs. Montana, we are still bickering over if we should have a new name and logo or not. God help us, we need it.
  17. Roughriders is unique to NCAA athletics (if I am wrong, please correct me on that). Once again, I do not care if GFRR or a certain CFL team uses it. It is the best option we have and I think we should go for it and run with it. In 10 years, a lot of this back and forth debating is going to look silly and laughable in retrospect.
  18. That would incur the wrath of the ND Legislature, which would probably defund the entire University System if it didn't get them in trouble with small town voters. This will be funded using private funds.
  19. Rig the electronic voting machines. -Ohio in 2004.
  20. That is exactly what I am thinking on this. I say Roughriders finishes in the top two of the initial balloting and then wins the run-off.
  21. He is just venting his frustration with our lack of leadership on this and other issues. And I do not blame him at all. Congrats on your school's gutsy leadership on this. I hate the Bison and always will, but you guys are doing it the right way.
  22. It was essential that the FU trolls who would love to ruin UND's image for years to come were not allowed to vote on this. That was my biggest concern, they would all go out en mass and vote Sundogs just to make us look bad. With our asinine decision making on the FCOA issue, we are doing a nice job of doing that ourselves.
  23. That could also be construed as a justification for voting North Stars.
  24. That is the nightmare scenario in all this. I think Roughriders will make the final two and will win the run-off. It might even get a majority in the first round of voting.
×
×
  • Create New...