-
Posts
6,790 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
97
Everything posted by Siouxperfan7
-
Vote No for your own selfish desires, Vote Yes for UND.
-
That's hostile and abusive towards white people!!
-
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
Ok, sorry I meant regular season games. Yeah yeah, you have the right to brag. The Bison are the defending champs and we are 11-11 over the last two years. But remember, NDSU was 3-8 just 2 short years ago. So teams can go from a bottom dweller to a Playoff contender or a National Champion very quickly. NDSU is not the only school in the country that can turn a 3-8 season to a National Championship. We will be there with you in the playoffs sooner than Bison fans want to admit it. -
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
No one ever claimed that a UND game would be bigger than a National semi-final game at home. What was being pointed out is the OOC games that are on your schedule from the past few years and in the future. Playoffs is a completely differenct thing. A National semi0final game is bigger than any home game you would schedule. But you can't tell me that there would be a regular season game that would be more anticipated than UND. Please Johnboy, provide me a list of teams that would be more anticipated, hyped up, talked about, whatever..more than UND. Thanks -
Voting No will not "stick it to the NCAA." They will let us keep the name. They never siad that we absolutely had to change it. But if we do keep in now, we will have sanctions against us. So if we vote to keep the NCAA, they aren't going to admit they were wrong, say their sorry, or lift the santions. So by voting No you would not be "sticking it" to the NCAA. You would be "sticking it" to UND and its athletic department.
-
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
And that's why we want to schedule NDSU for a home game....because they are a winnable game!! -
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
I guess if I couldn't beat a team I wouldn't want to scheule them either!! Just schedule OOC games against teams you can beat -
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
How many hours before the game starts do NDSU studesnts stand in line for games no agianst the teams you play....a few hours? How many hours did the students stand in line for the last Sioux/Bison game in 2002 at the dome? Pretty sure is was at least 6 hours...or more!!! How many threads are there on Bisonville about the Montana State game next year in the dome? Or any other game you have on your schedule? How many posts have there been on this thread about the game and on B-vill about the game? This game is not even on the schedule yet here we are talking about it. Don't tell me that there is no interest for this game or that other games have greater interest to Bison fans. You can't honestly believe that. How many posts have you made on this thread about this potential game? You obviously have interest about it, so don't tell me other Bison fans don't. -
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
UND does use premium pricing for hockey games. So do other schools. Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Denver games are all $15 more per game. 8000 tickets (excluding the students of course) at $15 per per game for those 6 games....do the math, that's $720,000 that UND makes because they charge more for those games. Are people still going to guy those tickets...hell ya!!! And other shcools in the WCHA do it too. Heck, other schools in the NCAA at all levels do it. You think at Alabama charges the same amount for the Vanderbilt game as they do the Auburn game?? Absolutley not!! they realize a high demand game when they see one and realize people would pay a premium price for those games. If NDSU doens't think that people would pay 15-20 dollars more for a UND game, then they are seriously morons. That is a lot of revenue to be lost. If NDSU can't realize the benifit of premium pricing, then that's their problem. But no other game in Fargo will be bigger than a UND NDSU football game. Not Montana, SDSU, UNI...no one. People will pay more for the game. -
Relax...I was just making a joke. Sure it was at Dave's expense...but he's a big boy he can take it You're right, no one on this site has EVER pushed their views on anyone else!!
-
If you need help deciding how to vote, do the opposite of what Dave does. So it would be No on 2, Yes on 3, and Yes on 4. That's exactly how I was going to vote. Glad to know that I don't have the same mindset as Dave!!!
-
Be smart and vote YES
-
http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/237541/group/Sports/
-
Students and student athletes that are currently living in Grand Forks this summer WILL get a chance to vote. Their voices will be heard.
-
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
What really needs to be decided is are both schools willing to give up an FBS game or a home game every 4 years to play their in state rival. In the world of D1 football, we all know that money is huge factor now. So really both schools need to look at the financial gain or loss that will come from having these games. From NDSU's perspective, they will deffinitely make money by having UND come and play in Fargo. If there is a hojme a home agreement, I doubt that UND will be asking for hundreds of thousands of dollars to play there. So instead of having to pay $200,000 dollars to Robert Morris, you can keep that in your pocket. Plus, like previously stated, NDSU can sell this game as a premium game and make money. Just do the math. Say there are 15,000 tickets sold (taking out students, band, etc). If they sold the UND game for $20 more a ticket, thats $300,000 EXTRA that NDSU would make from this game. So from the money they would use to pay to bring a team in, and the money they would make off of premium priced tickets, that's a profit of $500,000. (just an estimate, of course). So in 2017, NDSU can still schedule 6 home games and still be able to afford not to play an FBS "money game" and play at UND because they have already banked an extra $500,000 in 2015 from scheduling UND at home. To me this makes sense. Unless I am missing something. It doesn't sound like this is a money issue. -
I guess it is just frustrating trying to debate with uninformed people. That is what we are trying to do here. Inform the uniformed. For example, your comment says we think keeping the nickname will hurt the FOOTBALL teams chances of playing in the Big Sky. It is much bigger then that. It affects ALL sports playing in the Big Sky....not just football. We get kicked out of the Big Sky, no other conference is going to want to have us and deal with the drama. So then we are left scheduling not only all non conference games for football, but non conference games for basketball, volleyball, etc. Playing teams like Montana, Montana State, Cal Poly, etc. are much more attractive to play for not only fans, but future recruits. If we get stuck scheduling Sioux Falls, Montana Western, Jamestown, Mayville, etc., that is going to not only affect attendance at games, but recruits are not going to want to play for a school that plays down to lower division teams because they don't have a conference. Also no conference means no autobid for playoffs. Makes it harder to make the playoffs. Again, attendance, recruiting, and interest in all sports will suffer. These scenerios aren't way out in left field. We can debate all we want about whether keeping the name will get us kicked out of the Big Sky. But there is that chance. If we keep the name and get kicked out of the Big Sky Conference, these things WILL happen. there is no debate that being a D1 independent in all sports would be harmfull to the program.
-
Dave should have taken the advice that is on the bottom of all your posts: "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt." -Abraham Lincoln American President (1809 - 1865)
-
So does this mean that you and other "nickname at all costs" people may be wrong? You said it yourself in this post!! So guess what, you could be wrong!! The world is round and keeping the name will hurt UND.
-
Wait...does this mean if the YES vote prevails, we will retire DaveK as well? Probably the best reason to Vote YES that I have heard so far!!
-
Unfortunately you do not believe in facts. Undisputable facts. You believe your own misguided beliefs to be facts. I think most of realize that nothing said to you is ever going to change your mind on the subject. That's ok. you're stuborn. Nothings going to change that. What pretty much sums up your misguided argument is where you say "I support the nickname." Now, the majority of us on this site are for the nickname but we support the University of North Dakota first and foremost. Without UND, there is no Fighting Sioux, not the other way around.
-
Uh duh...AC Slater of course!!! AC....aka...NDAC....aka North Dakota Agricultural College.....aka......NDSU.
-
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
So I guess the real question in the debate of "Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?" is will both schools benefit from it. Taylor had mentioned an "every other year" option a few years back, and Faison has now said that option will work as well. So if you look at the actions done by the AD's at both schools, two men that obviously look into the all aspects of it more than you and I do because it is their job, you can assume that it is in the best interests of both schools. So whether you are for or against it, the AD's at both schools apparently think it is beneficial for their respective school and athletic department. -
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
Except the reason for not playing is not the same. UND did not want to play NDSU because it hurt their playoff changes. That was the primary reason. The reason NDSU fans say they shouldn't play is because they would rather have an FBS game or a home game as opposed to playing an FCS game on the road. Both teams are not going to give up a lot. Basically by scheduling it every other year at rotating sites, every 4 years both schools will have to either lose a home game or not play an FBS game. So both schools will have to decide which is more important, a home game or an FBS game. But that decision only has to me made every 4 years. Not to much to ask for. -
POLL: Should UND-NDSU Resume the Football Series?
Siouxperfan7 replied to ShilohSioux's topic in Football
Exactly. Can you blame RT for not wanting to play NDSU when it not only hurt their playoff chances (only wins agains D2 teams count in the playoff commitees eyes) but they would have cleary had the advantage due to doublt the scholarship players. So all this talk about UND ending the rivalry that is at the root of most Bison fans anger towards UND and not wanting to play them again is just rediculous. -
And lets not forget that there are talks about changing the hockey playoff format where top teams would actually host NCAA playoff games.