siouxfan512

I'm still good with North Dakota or Nodaks, but well put for the most part. Loved the Fighting Hawks comments.

Serious question: Is the nickname committee actually so disconnected with reality to think Pride is a worthy option? There must be someone who has made them aware of the reprecussions of a name like this.

Good news, that is the way it should be if this program wants to be competitve. Sets the right tone.

To summarize the rest of the posts in this string ... remaining names on the list are pure garbage (exception of possibly RoughRiders and Cavalry). Based on what I have read and seen in the voting polls (though not the most accurate measure. Top 3 should be (in no particulat order): Cavalry North Dakota Roughriders

Not sure if this was usual for Freshmen in the past, but if not, it is certainly setting a good standard going forward.

This!

Clearly I hadn't read beyond the headline. Great News .. good to get these guys in early.

If UND goes with Pride, I would find it fairly hard not to join the chants. I'll still cheer for the team, but how can you blame and opposition for not spiking the ball when you float it up to them like that.

"But UND signed a legal document saying they will adopt a new one" Ambiguous .... University of North Dakota would be a new reference to the athletics teams, as Fighting Sioux would be old.

I understand needing to pick a name, then the committe needs to give us something better than the University of North Dakota Pride or Sun Dogs.

Unless they pick North Dakota as their name. That is picking a new name to identify themselves. "New" - as in not their "former" name. If your argument is that the University of North Dakota has been around since 1883, they have never used that over a different nickname. They were flickertails, fighting sioux, nothing .... and now? NoDaks isn't a NEW term so thats out. Sun Dogs certainly aren't a new thing...can't use that. Roughriders are certainly not NEW ... take that off the list. I'm sure you have big time connections, but it is possible that the school and committe have more knowledge on the whole process than you, and I am inclined to believe that UND would't be moving forward in this process with some input or communication with the NCAA. I could be wrong, but if North Dakota is on the list, it is likely very much in play.

I agree, it is certainly better than most of the names on this list. You could come up with a decent logo, and at least there would be some meaning or reason behind the name. More so than Spirit, Pride or Force.

Any word on which freshmen will be in GF all summer? I saw that Mason Bennett will head to UND right after graduation, which is awesome. Hoping most freshman will do the same, particularly our running back recruits. The more experience and work they get in right away, the better off they will be this fall.

and Boom goes the dynamite!

gotta love when posters play the lawyer role.

depends? over Pride, Spirit, Force or Sundogs ... YES, well worth the gamble.

If you really don't want North Dakota, get a committee that can provide better options than Pride or Spirit. Then we can talk.

School has done their part. Neither the School nor the NCAA can or will controll what fans chant/wear/refer to the team as. Overly asserting this type of control is just furthering the liberal notion to control everyone is the PC world these people want to live in.

Classic!

I don't read the Herald, so sure .... I mean seriously, we have to listed to the argument of marketing and national exposure and then you are going to reference The Herald ...

I get what you are saying, but in this day and age when you are adopting a new nickname, you would like to think a committee of educated indivuals would do better than Spirit, Pride, Blaze, Force, Sun Dogs, Etc. The only names on this list that could even be considered (North Dakota, Nodaks, Roughriders, Cavalry) Names that could have been in the top 15 that would have been better than the majority of this list: Nokota, Flickertails ... even oilers, jets, aviators (which I never really liked, but are still better than most of this list)

Agreed. I know my vote is for North Dakota. BUT Roughriders, Cavalry and Nodaks would be acceptable. The rest of these names are just trash.

Could be true, but even so ... maybe in 10-20 years they can come up with a better list than these clowns did.

Not even going to get drawn into the debate of "new" nicknames. The option is on the list. BUT don't be so ignorant to think that simply adopting a new nickname will eliminate anyone's use of Fighting Sioux. If we stay North Dakota, some will continue using Fighting Sioux. If we adopt a new nickname, some will continue using Fighting Sioux. Regardless, it was already dropped officially. As far as the NCAA is concerned, the school has moved on.

Then it would just look like one of those spearment hard candies. The kind you see sitting in a bowl at your grandma's house, with a nice coat of dust on them (probably been there about 6 months). You all know what I'm talking about.