siouxfan512

So is that a definitive Rhett is back? Or a UND as a whole will be back in the tourney? I'll assume Rhett will be back since he isn't a huge flight risk. And wasn't he just drafted last season anyway?

possibly, but I assume it comes down to a bidding process and money talks. Don't really know how it works though.

Seeing how we lost the Fighting Sioux name, because we had to get approval from an Indian tribe that was located partially in South Dakota, the NCAA better not consider it too far away.

haha, I'll admit, I was all ready to celebrate a 5-3 Double OT win for UND...... so close.

haha, I mean, I hope all draft picks in college hockey, except those from UND, sign tomorrow!!!

Absolutely, and as much as I hate UMD right now, it is pretty obvious what talent, experience, and maturity can add to a program. I think the National Championship Union team was built in a similar way, older, experienced guys.

Money talks, but I'm pretty sure he already said he was coming back. A championship and contract offer could change that, but I bet we see him next season. Kid is so good, but I hope he stays. It is good for college hockey altogether when the talent doesn't bolt after 1 year. UND, DU, UofM, or otherwise.

This is certainly an option though I don't see it happening. Obviously would love to see the kid in a UND jersey as long as possible. I do have a few issues with that approach though. -I think the kids to realize that when a team (even a down team) drafts them, they are truly making an investment in that player and their future. They are giving the kid the potential to live out their dream. I think players usually recognize that and appreciate it. -If it becomes too common for college kids to not sign with the team that drafted them, especially high picks, that deters NHL teams from drafting, or highly drafting college kids, which could in turn deter kids from taking the college route. Would hate to see the college game take a step back, when they have done such a good job of getting more kids to the NHL. Obviously would love to see more kids stay 3-4 years though.

So it shall be written So it shall be done ...... Hang 9

Agreed. If you think you are coming back to have a down season, that could certainly play a factor. At the same time, UND has been a tourney team and won 20+ games for the last 15 years. Pretty much anyone who ever comes back (drafted or UFA) comes back knowing they have a chance to compete for a title. I think if Jost goes, it will not be based on what a few of his teammates do. I'm sure Sakic wants him bad, but hopefully lets Tyson do what he thinks is best without too much pressure. Playing MJ vs college is a real possibility he will have to consider; though I think he would make the team out of camp. I also think that we he picked college over MJ, he knew he was likely in it for 2 seasons. Nothing to based that on, just my opinion. Jost also seem so impressed early in the season by UND and fans, I think he really enjoyed the season, team, culture, etc. and would give it one more go. Again, all speculation. Obviously only 1 person out there that has any sincere idea of what will happen, and that is Jost.

How about Mismash or Gersich. Those are pretty solid reasons, if you looking for someone to play with. How about that loss to BU in double OT? That's a decent reason to come back. Money talks, but I see Jost coming back next year.

Wow, Red and Bernie Sanders look a lot alike.

Yeah, that was about the only name I could think of too. Was hoping there might me some more. Obviously, just want the best coach for the job (whenever that may be), but it is always fun to bring in alumni with ties to the program.

IF Jackson were to get another job. Any idea who we would see get added to the staff? Shaw seemed like the exception to UND usually getting UND alumni. Does UND have many coaching potentials working their way up the ranks?

With all of the openings out there this season, it will be interesting to see if Dane Jackson gets a look anywhere. Hope we keep him, but he could be a good head coach somewhere.

Not possible. Red Berenson will NEVER retire. haha

Anyone know when they announce next year's schedule?

Welp, Hockey is over. Sucks to end the season that way. Sucks even more to have to wait so long to watch UND hockey again. Good news, we keep inching toward football season. Can't wait to watch this team! Going to be another step forward this year.

Graduate: Ausmus, Hrinkiw Likely to Sign: Brock (Obviously), T. Poolman, Poganski (based on current reports) *It will be interesting to see what happens with Tucker and his injury. Outside chance he comes back, but probably gone. Pogo should stay, but will probably go get paid and play in the minors. 50/50: Cam (Turned down offers last year, already has a title), Jost (obvious NHL talent) *If I had to guess, both Jost and Cam will be back; but I would not be shocked if either left. Unlikely, by possible: Gersich, Gardner, Wolanin *We always seem to have a few that sign early that shouldn't. Gersich is the most ready to make the move talent wise. Gardner has the size and physicality. Wolanin played much better as the year went on but could be a really good 4 year player. If you could keep all 3 guys through their senior year, you could have a ton of talent. Actually, if you look at how many good Sophmores this team has, we could be really good next year, and really really good the following year. So much good talent coming in to add to the mix. Mismash will be a stud. I like Kawaguchi to light the lamp too. Jones, Keane, Bast ... Love this program; it is always easy to look forward to next year! Really hope Tomek is ready to step in and play some game. Kids has the potential, and I'm ready to see it. Anyone who questions what they have seen from Tomek, need only look back to Cam's first time getting some game time for UND. Heck even look back to his first game last year against Maine. I'd say he has turned out just fine; I assume Tomek will too.

I hear ya, my point was just that you retain your top talent unless they are a massive distraction. Granted, maybe there is more to the situation.

And for those who don't remember Tyler Hirsch, He just about killed himself with this dumb move after losing to UND, in what I believe was a 3rd place game at the WCHA final five. Psycho!!!

Yeah, there is just no way I can believe Boeser leaving would have been better for UND or Brock. Brock couldn't help having injuries, anymore than any other player can. I'm sure he played when he could, but have to understand he also has a lot more to risk being a highly drafted player with a bright future and money on the line. If Brocks situation was affecting anyone in the locker room, it is on the coaches and captains to address those issues, and the team certainly seemed to come together to close out the season. IMO, IF there were and real locker room issues, it had more to do with losing 8 games between January and February, which is on the team, not one person. Hard for any team to cope with that stretch, let alone a bunch of kids coming off a championship season. By the logic that Boeser should have left, we may as well not welcome back Jost either. Which would be completely preposterous. If you have high end talent, you want them back unless they are a total distraction. And I mean huge off the ice issues, or getting in trouble publicly, or losing their f-ing mind like Tyler Hirsch from the Gophers did. As was mentioned, 1 or 2 things go differently last Friday, we "could" be playing in Chicago, and the statement about Boesers return is even more asinine.

Agreed! I do think part of what Kelley did to make people upset was implement a committee and a vote, but then take the most popular option off of the table. Now, I understand why he did not want the "no nickname" option, but I do think that move upset a lot of people. Also seemed like the committee weeded out a lot of legitimate options early on. Ex. I thought Nokota (Nokes) was a decent option and could have had a cool logo. Committee nixed that because it sounded Indian and was too closely spelled to an Indian tribe, when it is in fact the state horse. If that is the case we should probably eliminate "Dakota" from all official school language too. There were a few other decent options as well. End of the day, at least we are not SUNDOGS!!

My .02 The nickname battle is over. The "official" name and logo are set; whether people like it or not. I think a lot of the anger is not just for the new name and logo, but they way they were shoved down peoples throats. Regardless, it is done. I have somewhat warmed to the name and logo, at least for football and basketball. I'll admit, I still call the hockey team the Sioux, and probably always will. Partially our of habit, partially because, that is what it was when I went to school there, partially because I like Sioux better than Hawks, partially because the name Fighting Sioux was SO intertwined into the hockey history, partially because I'm stubborn and defiant, and partially because ... I Can. I haven't bought any Hawks gear yet, but probably will when I get to Sheels in Fargo in a few weeks. I'm not completely defiant, and while I love the name Fighting Sioux, I support UND. Also want to buy a current hockey jersey before they are gone too. Want to protest the name, keep wearing your old Sioux gear to games. There is no shame in that. It is still part of the history, and still represents UND. Keep cheering the name if you choose to. Frankly, I think it is dumb for people to put down those who cheer on the old name, just as I think it is dumb to put down those who cheer Hawks. Everyone adjusts their perspective at different times, everyone has different feelings about the name, and as with any socio-political issue, putting people down or berating them based on their views is not going to convince them otherwise. Hawks, Sioux or otherwise. That being said, I think at this point, formal protests in attempt to change the name or logo are far beyond worthless at this point. The name is what it is. The logo is what it is, though I get why not everyone likes that logo. If you really want to make an impact, initiate a letter writing campaign to the school to NOT replace the logo, but ADD to it. An additional logo may draw in more fans of the name, it allows for additional merchandising options for fans, and if you do it right, could even create a potential mascot, which appeals to families and young fans.

Yep, whenever I make it up to Fargo or GF and have some pepper, I say I'm going to hand in my adult life and go back to college too. Seriously, what is the kid supposed to say? F you all, I'm going pro! I'm sure the kid is just pleasantly appeasing the people asking him. That being said, if I were a betting man, I'd guess we will see him one more year. The article make some great points about him being NHL ready, but another year at UND solidifying his immediate NHL contribution. Also picked UND partially because of Toews, who stayed 2 years to develop. Could have gone major junior route, but was set on college; I'd assume this was always likely to be a 2 year commitment. Also made it very clear just how excited he was to be here, and how great the culture was. Also just played with Brock Boeser who stayed for a second year to continue development. Also just had a heart wrenching loss in the NCAA tourney. That is the kind of loss that gets some kids to return and end on a better note. No guarantees, but IMO, we see Josty as at least a top 10 finalist for the Hobey next season.