UND1983

When I click the the newest thread link on the home page it always takes me to the 1st post of the thread? I have clicked on every page of the thread.

The NCAA sent them an email or stated what was written above. Is that a direct quote by them to UND or maybe an indirect quote or a soft quote? Let us know, chief.

So you are now telling everyone that the NCAA doesn't mean what they wrote to UND? They were joking.

What part of this direct quote from the NCAA themselves do people not understand: "However, the NCAA did say that if fans resumed using Sioux or Fighting Sioux, the NCAA believes other schools will complain and that, in turn, would very likely result in sanctions. The NCAA does seem to believe that UND has done its best to comply with the settlement agreement."

What part of what has been said above don't you get? The NCAA just stated they are leaving the door open to sanctions. Siiux Forever, right?

Like who?

Are the moustache rides free? Interesting twist to a "grand opening".

Weber point is 1,000,000,000% wrong.

That will be the next letter to the editor out of Spirit Lake.

Did they let it bleed out for at least 28 days? It is covered with a roof and no sun, therefore, its going to take longer to bleed out and cure.

I agree Darrell. Pat does a nice job with play by play and is very knowledgeable from having 30+ years of experience. I also like Dan doing the TV.

He definitely looks fast on film.

This is a recruiting thread.

Thanks for sharing and being completely wrong. Too bad you aren't around more. Nobody blasted Jack at all. I blasted the setup of having a Fargo/NDSU guy doing UND games. And I am right. Jack is great at his job but should be doing NDSU coverage being he is in Fargo and on The Fan. Also, 970am has the rights and Jack works for 740. Figure it out.

Like I said earlier about an "addendum" and it's meaning. But, of course was told I was wrong.

Really, please explain?

They sure as hell aren't going to win it by speeding up the pace, which they have no idea how to do. Of course they are going to take shots, that is not exclusive from playing conservative.

Do you think? Tell us more. Of course they are going to be conservative, they were conservative for 12 games last year. Darrell addressed one aspect of the game. Yes, even we minions understand that defense needs to be played too. Oh, and something called special teams (never really heard of it).

People are actually trying to talk about the game. Some know more than others. The last thing we need is jackweed comments filling it up again. And yes, trying to actually keep their offense on the field is the only way UND stays close. But, that goes for most every team in America.

Once again, an addendum only pertains to what the addendum addresses in it. It has nothing to do with anything that IT does not speak to specifically.

He has no idea what he is talking about. Read my post above.

Size of the defensive lineman has nothing to do with anything. Their defensive lineman have never been huge but have been tougher than hell and good. The problem with UND's offensive line is their is little depth and some are too weak/thin to help at this point.

Exactly right. But the media could not turn to UND for a comment anymore because they moved on and did everything they were supposed to do to solve these issues. "Take it up with the group that did it"......

But if they have a new nickname nobody will care-not UND's fault. If they keep the elephant in the room, in the room, it will be a big deal.

My opinion: It will be nice having a UND guy do UND football games. Not a guy who spends 5 days a week talking about NDSU on the radio in Fargo and then travels up to UND games on the weekend. That setup sucked. Like Jack but the setup was bad.