UND1983

I'll take that as you know I'm right since you resorted to unrelated junk.

http://www.heidiczerwiec.com/ At least she doesn't take her self too seriously. Look at that picture.

Does Denver need to win today for any seeding purposes or are they a #2-3 anyway?

What was that about the Summit being better than the MVC this year? #butrpi?

No angle. I am asking cause he doesn't look the part. Maybe he is fine, just asking.

Is Shaw good enough to play at UND, at this level? Just doesn't seem to fit in out there for some reason. Asking honestly cause I don't know.

It leaves everybody uneasy based on history. If they lose tomorrow could it cost them the Minneapolis Regional #1 seed? Meaning they get sent east...

More like the unsilent minority who have seen this show before. Hopefully, the producer changes the ending.

Worst 6 on 5 ever. They got more shots than UND did.

Is that this years excuse? Sounds good I guess.

UND has serious, chronic "Semi-Final" issues.

Great effort.

Is this for real or are you trying to get us going?

And as I tend to do, spoke too early and was wrong. Apologies to ladies. Finish it off!

Just win baby.

Nothing like the AD investing in hoops, like we all ask for, and then they both lose at home. This game should be winnable.

There was more than 1,200 there. Is this one of those deals like NCAA football playoffs where you want to under report? But since its a bid deal I don't know why that would be.

A classic I read was where, "NDSU suspended Dupree for 6 games". No, he quit on the team for four games, came back, and was suspended for two, then was put in vs. IPFW due to injury. Guess what he did and teaching him a lesson wasn't as important as needing him vs. the Dons.

Didn't the REA have something to do with the actual money being used for the bid? If so they would keep all concession revenue as well.

When looking around the crowd and comparing to past games it seemed like more than that but who knows.

A desperation, last second heave is not what we are talking about. They had a chance to win it with a legitimate play out of a timeout and didn't get a shot off.

I don't think anybody who actually watched the Weber game was upset Q didn't get the ball. He had two guys draped all over him intentionally, which surprised the hell out of UND. You go with the hot hand to win the game, IMO. It can change game to game but it is usually the same 2-3 guys. This game it was definitely Geno AT HOME. He was spectacular on the drive last night.

Those were good looks, agreed. Hookers three in OT looked like it was gonna be good. I just can't get over the fact they had a chance to win it in regulation and never got a shot off. I will eventually move on.

Quote from Jones: "You can’t control whether the ball goes in but you can control the quality of looks you get.” Or don't get. It was a fun, fun game to watch. But, not being able to finish in tight games has been going on for how long now? At home, on the road, neutral site...doesn't matter. Maddening.