MoSiouxFan

49-43. 3:43. Haven't scored for about 2 min.

49-39 Sioux. 5:31 left.

45-39 Sioux. 7:59 to go.

We outrebounded them 40-23. What's up with that?

Good perspective. I don't see anything wrong with discussing coaching strategies, coaching decisions, etc., when its done as constructive criticism. And there's no doubt that we also have the right to opine that a coach ought to be fired. However, having the right to do something doesn't automatically mean that it's right to do. I think we all have our opinions as to which coaches ought to be coaching at our level and which coaches may ultimately need to be replaced for not getting the job done after a reasonable period of time. However, nothing is gained by calling for a coach to be fired on this forum, especially in light of the fact that, as has been pointed out, players and future recruits undoubtedly read this forum regularly. Future recruits especially are going to be influenced by what's written on this forum.

Thanks, Johnny Five. The same to you.

Thanks. Any further updates?

I believe they're now 3-4.

Thanks for the updates, guys!

Yes, how could we POSSIBLY win, down 2-1 with 6 min. to go in the 2nd.

Sorry; got it directly from ESPN Gamecast, which showed "End 2nd Half." Go figure.

69-65 Final.

TO UND. 69-63 with 2:01 left.

Sioux now within 5. 4:29 left.

62-56 with 5:33 to go.

58-50 Hawaii with 7:59 to play. Consecutive 3's by Webb and Anderson.

Didn't see that he was dressed, so, for whatever reason, it looks like he wasn't on the travelling team.

Drove over to Manhattan for the game with my brother and a friend. Decent first half overall. The biggest difference in the game was that K State has 3 or 4 bigs (and I mean bigs) that they rotated in and out the entire game and we just don't have the size to compete against a front line with that kind of size and depth. They just kept pounding it inside and Brekke and Wilmer both fouled out fairly early in the second half, which wiped out much chance of keeping the score reasonable. Doubt that anyone in the Big Sky has even close to the kind of frontline size and depth that KState has. Nearly everyone shot poorly but, as someone has already pointed out, the shooting should improve, as we're better shooters than we showed Fri. night. It also didn't help any that K State had already played two exhibition games.

Likewise. I'll be doing my part. We'll stand out like a sore thumb in that sea of purple.

Went to the KU/UND game last season in Lawrence and, as you know, KU DOES have atmosphere, and a lot of it. I can see where it would be very intimidating for visiting teams to play there, as evidenced by the fact that KU seldom loses at home.

Looking forward to seeing the game in person. Hopefully, with our experience, we won't be intimidated by the atmosphere and will go in there and stand up to them for 40 minutes. Gotta keep Magruder and Rodriguez from having big games.

Am with you on this one. There are a couple of posters on here whose only solution/reaction after any two-game losing streak in one of our major sports is "fire Muss," "fire Hak," or "fire Jones." The coach's name that goes in the blank just depends upon which season we're in. They've lost all credibility because that's basically the only input that they ever have after a two-game losing streak. And if the team in question happens to go on a winning streak, all we get from them is silence; seldom, if ever, anything positive. Sad.

Looking forward to going, also.

Yeah, displaying the level of success that Hanson has had this season and with the wealth of receivers returning next year, I don't think it would be too difficult to entice another 5th-year dropdown to come in for a year and compete for the starting job on a team that we expect/hope to make the playoffs, depending on the level of improvement in our defense. Also, based on the last couple years, would much prefer a dropdown to a JUCO transfer.

JOOC, who's FU??