Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

gordwiser

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by gordwiser

  1. It's a win on the record, and a win for the H2H comparison in the pairwise, but it's only 2/3rds of a win in the OT RPI calculation.
  2. Does anyone have interest in this handmade cradle with Sioux emblems? My wife wants it out of the house and I can't in good conscience throw it away. Made by my father in law, basically new, we never really used it, just been in the basement for awhile. We're in Rogers, MN
  3. Sandy took 11 years to lead a team to a title. We're in Berry's 6th year and two of those were effed up due to a pandemic... and he already got the team over the hump that they couldn't get over with Hak. Personally, I have quite a bit more tolerance. Two down years while he got his recruits in and established his own system and culture is nothing... especially in this day and age of college hockey with parity and choices for kids to play abound.
  4. Wife won't let me drive up from Minneapolis in this cold.... Section 112, Row G $100 total for the pair. I can transfer them through Ticketmaster.
  5. UND always has a tough time in Clown... and the games are battles. I've taken in most of the series there for the last 15 years and the last "easy" win I remember for the Sioux was ten years ago. I think the only sweep by either team during that time was in 2016, which is pretty remarkable. Sioux didn't play poorly... flat out dominated during stretches... a few things to clean up, but given the history of their games at the concrete palace, I wouldn't be too worried with the results this weekend.
  6. Thank you so much for the link, I really appreciate it!
  7. If this was the Old Ralph... UND would be #1... the New Ralph.... meh. Don't get me wrong, I still love going to games, and now taking my kids there, but I would trade 100 games at the new arena to be a part of some of those game atmospheres at the old place.
  8. Someone tell me I'm not crazy.... is there not a "live" button on the nchc player? I keep getting to the end of the feed and I have to reload... I can't get a live feed...
  9. !@#$! And now I have to share a hotel room with three gopher fans. There's not enough booze in the world for this.
  10. Can meet at game. Section 108 row r $50 total for the pair or b/o
  11. Driving up from Cities with my 4 year old for his first Sioux game... rest of family couldn't make it so i have two extra. Section 108 Row R $50 for the pair. Will meet at the game since we're on the road.
  12. I ended up buying more tickets than I could use and have to sell a pair. $90 total, same as what I paid. section 106, row h I'm in grand forks today and can meet. private message me.
  13. Personally, I think they look good. When they're skating around in them hoisting #8, no one is going to give a $@!+ about how wide the stripes are.
  14. Additionally, Kristo isn't a minor, the parents aren't allowed to say anything either, medically anyway.
  15. section C2 for me with a gopher fan... Haha!
  16. gordwiser

    Dell

    I don't think this is coincidence. Goerhing was small and had to be positionally sound and could make the highlight save on occasion. Dell isn't as small, but he has been the other two. Three months ago after seeing Dell play in person I felt the best about our goalie situation since Goerhing was tending the net.
  17. I can't believe you think that is conclusive evidence... an angled shot from 200 feet away? What if the puck was slightly elevated? The angle would show white under the puck, but not whether the white was from the puck over the line. Agree to disagree, because after watching the replay 100 times from all the angles I still don't see conclusive evidence. I agree that it probably was, but I'm not convinced it was.
  18. In NCAA tourney play you can use any camera angle/view/replay available. Also, to DaveK, this is not a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" situation for the refs. As stated above, the rule is clear. There has to be conclusive evidence. There is no "spirit" of the rule to enforce. If it was called a goal on the ice it should have stood because there wasn't enough to overturn it, but it wasn't called a goal on the ice.
×
×
  • Create New...