In a way, though, unranked teams are more dangerous in the pairwise and truly have “must win” implications. A loss to UMn wouldn”t be fatal; a loss to Canisius could be. On the other hand an underdog win against the goofs would be a springboard, while a win against Can would just help us tread water.
the big risk I can see is an azzkicking by UMn or BU would not be good for an inexperienced goalie’s mojo early in the season, which would make us vulnerable to the unranked teams on the schedule.
We are all around you: your milkman, the man who tunes your car, who rents you your videos, who repairs your shoes, who designs your check blanks. We're everywhere, and our voice is strong, if just a little muted. .
I'm sure it affects uncommitted recruits, especially the younger ones, to see some programs getting top commits and transfers. A little of the Ivy League effect. Which programs are perceived to be at the top of that heap in any given year or years is a little cyclical, I suppose. UMn is bound to be pretty consistently up there, given the number of elite players growing up there.
Silly me; I thought it would be safe to conclude that forwards would feel free to be more aggressive on the forecheck and deep penetration if they had elite goaltender and D behind them. No data or real hockey theory to back it up though, other than the fact that I'm never wrong.
One small upside is that the young forwards seemed to improve their defensive play later in the season. OTOH, it's hard to develop an aggressive, attacking offense if you lack confidence in the D and goalie behind you.
Hopefully, Jake can get some pickpocketing lessons from his cousin this summer.