mikejm

Wow, when you look at the tournament in these terms, UND beat the hell out of everyone they played.

Already has.

This from Mavs Puck board: Getting rid of the asst. coaches is not the answer. Lot's of lipstick but it's still a pig and Blais is the reason.

Late to this discussion, but a couple of points to consider: The radio station that buys the rights to NDSU football doesn't sell any of the advertisements aired during the game, or the "official" pre-game or post-game. That is a package produced by and sold by NDSU. KFGO could only sell ads in the pre-pre-game and the extended, non-official post-game. I'm sure the football games add to the station's listenership, but it isn't doing a lot in the directly-attributable revenue department. I don't know if that's how UND broadcasts are structured.

Moving to Florida seems to have changed Brian's outlook a bit: I think this was his first game for the Lightning.

For the teams who have to play UND, yes. Our favorite hockey team is playing really, really well.

...What? Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?...

From the article: "Brian Lee’s crushing hit (video) on Palushaj to keep the puck in the offensive zone" Clearly this is a different Brian Lee. Just kidding. Good for him.

I am no political expert — nor did I spend last night at a Holiday Inn Express — but I'd say Carlson's seat is quite safe.

QFI

10-109-10 Can that be right?

I was thinking Tribbles, but yeah.

Let's just win Friday and see what Saturday brings.

^Funny!

I think the operative word is "directed".

I'm surprised Blais didn't go thermonuclear on that. I see Don Adam reffed the game...

And the hits just keep on coming...

One of six bullets for instance.

I think we are talking about the same thing here, but I might be confused: 1. Carlson's Law makes Fighting Sioux indelible; 2. CL is repealed after NCAA laughs delegation back to ND, removing Fighting Sioux from state law; 3. "Repeal" law is subject of petition drive and statewide vote, which, if successful would revoke the repeal and again make Fighting Sioux the law of ND. (As of now, the repeal law is simply in limbo; if the statewide vote fails, the repeal stands.) I would guess the SBoHE has challenged Carlson's Law as being unconstitutional. If that challenge is upheld by the SCOND, the Repeal Law is rendered moot since the law it repealed is no longer law.

I'd say you have it right here, Sic. IMO, if Carlson's law is found to be unconstitutional, the repeal of said law is moot, and the statewide vote reinstate the (unconstitutional) law is illegal. (And, just to keep things tidy here, the story cited is an AP post, not from The Forum)

I admire your spirit and your optimism, but this ^ is really like playing Russian roulette with a fully-loaded revolver.

Can we get back to bashing S.A.B. here? All this hockey talk is clogging up the thread.

Whoa! Inflation.

Is your name Barry or Joel? If not, how can you "know for a fact"?