Stockdamhockey

Really? After months of politics on the site, this is where you draw the line. You are about as consistent as a bowel movement after Taco Bell.

And, there you go again. We know what you are. Pretty clear. You hide it pretty well from your employer and your church. Sad.

Ok. Slow down, take a breath Siouxsports.com. Port is a "columnist " not a journalist. Big difference. Yes, he interviewed the Vetter girl. But the University is prevented from sharing its side RE FERPA. So step back from the ledge. I know its difficult since sensationalism is the M.O. on this board. But just once lets try to not go all Thelma & Louise on this issue. And Oxbow6, you should sit this one out. Your discussion of "x" v. "ck" in Jaxson's name said so much about you. Go Cardinals. They must be so proud.

Almost certain Sicatoka's Bible qoute is for the benefit of posters on this board.

Not arguing. Pointing out slippery slope. A new era in speech is upon us. Racism is never justified. Speech is hard to govern. Context is important and the "goring of one's ox" is often the catalyst. I see "the reversal" of the decision as the discussion point.

Agree or not, Fighting Sioux was removed with rationale being it was racist. Does the continual reference to Fighting Sioux by hockey players and fans constitute the same speech? Or, are we now in an era where football players dictate punishment for volleyball players. And hockey continues to get a pass. Confused. Me too.

You mean kinda like referring to the hockey team as the Fighting Sioux?

Was there a new incident or is this a reversal of the Ath. Dept's original decision?

And from the last poster you'd ever expect it from, "MODS!!!!!!!"

You're a little late to the party Petey. Thanks for playing.

Really? We're going to head down that road. Hard r? Hair splitting at its finest.

There are two girls in the ticket ad. One is in no way associated with the recording. To say otherwise is a lie.

Its an ugly word. Are we prepared to censor lyrics?

So. Would it be ok if they just listened to the lyrics? What about lip syncing? And what about the girl who is in no way involved. Should there be clarification?

Let's be accurate. Singing lyrics to a song that was playing in the car. Does it make a difference? Yes. And its not the vb girl in the ad who was recorded. She was in the car. UND needs to clarify who said what. There's two girls in the ad. One was in the car. One did nothing and is not involved. Can you say slander?

Never gonna fault a kid for having honorable goals. Seems a better alternative to being a middle aged smart ass on an anonymous blog.

Dont correct posters on this forum with facts. They don't like that.

Not saying you did. "Fair enough" was for your take. The rest was for the board meteorologists.

Fair enough. But have any of you that are critical of the travel decisions RE Idaho St. stopped to think about the logistics of rescheduling the flight? Roughly 100 passengers with team and support staff, most of them students. Yes, student schedules matter. And are there charter planes just lying around the tarmac waiting to be re-scheduled? Don't think so. What about the cost of rescheduling the charter, the additional hotel stay? In a tight budget already, where does that come from? Then there's the decision to bus to Bemidji. Totally on the charter company since they were unwilling to land in GF given the conditions. And they were late to Bemidji. So, what about the storm. Local weather forecasters were arguing over the path and severity right up until it hit. So if the team was somehow able to leave early and nothing hits GF -- you 20/20 hindsight experts would criticize that as well. "The team laid around in Pocatello for 3 days. We were flat." Finally, do any of you really think Chaves and the coaches didn't discuss all options? I get criticized on here for my takes. But this forum is really all about the old saying about opinions. Its always 20/20 hindsight masquerading as expertise. Its the majority of you who have never done anything close to keeping a team together, leading a group in anything that come on and say sh*& about anything and everything as if you know. "That's what this site is for." You tear down everything and everyone in your path, then rip me for doing exactly what you do -- only to posters on the forum. The height of hypocrisy. I've been called old, angry, weak, everything on this board. I'll only admit to old

I drove the fan bus

As hard as it may be given what students account for revenue wise, I agree. Need to seriously consider reconfiguring. Bad look was even worse at midfield yesterday. TV audiences get a really bad impression. Suggest it. See what student reps have to say.

So happy you were never on a team I coached. I would have left your ass on the curb as the bus was pulling away.

What an incredible wealth of knowledge in this board. Football, psychology, diet, travel. I hope Bill Chaves is paying attention. It's all right here.

We don't compete with Big Sky schools in recruiting. Maybe UNC for Colorado kids. We compete with midwest schools. That's our footprint. The MVFC is a better comparison. Particularly NDSU, SDSU, USD, UNI. Sometimes Wyoming for top kids in MPLS. MAC schools on occasion. Big Ten (their walk-ons) become our partial or fulls. That's the reality. We have never had a recruiting footprint that matches the Big Sky. So S. Utah, Portland St., N. Arizona, the California schools and even the Montana schools are irrelevent to my point.

Thank you Mama Sue. Great to see some common sense on here. See my thoughts below.