Cratter
-
Posts
15,688 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
48
Everything posted by Cratter
-
Let's see if UND can put them away with this second two goal lead.
-
Nope.
-
North Dakota Hockey: Its Always a Home Game.
-
These refs suck. Both ways.
-
It is not. either rabbit ears or a west fargo bar with Midco.
-
No killer instinct for UND.
-
They are missing a decent coach. 9th Season for Idalski and he doesn't even have a winning record against Bemidji States current head coach (.500) You'd think in nine years you'd have some better talent and coaching than a second year coach recruiting against Bemidji State. Bemidji St. also went further in the playoffs than UND last year. (WCHA)
-
13.3 MN PPB is the UND game tonight for those rabbit ear folks.
-
So if Nodaks wins and trys to put a white guy (Big outcry), dark/tan skin (big outcry) I'd think the logo would be ambiguous or a horse or something.
-
Probably what the DU logo looks like.
-
Fargo (/NDSU) has such a good propaganda machine going with their "free in every grocery store" magazines of Fargo Monthly (/Bison Illustrated). In this months magazine one of the articles title is: "Is Fargo's Economy the Most Diverse in the Country?" (Page 31) I'm sure Bison Illustrated is the same since they are both produced by Spotlight Media. But I have no reason to read it.
-
For two UND games the whole season.
-
Vote on your final 5 nickname choices (just ND is out)
Cratter replied to jimdahl's topic in UND Nickname
If Nodaks was good. Why did the University not continue to use it like flickertails. -
Looks like you're right.
-
And then that contractor hired a subcontractor. And that subcontractor got hurt. Would the contractor be responsible. That's what was discussed. No one is trying to to blame the "homeowner" for the injury in this scenario. If the subcontractor burns your house down the contractor is responsible. Because the homeowner hired the contractor not the subcontractor. The contractor can then try and make a claim against the subcontractor.
-
#chuckthepigskin
-
In case you haven't watched it yet....
-
Like others have pointed out the UND Defense could have had some turnovers themselves. Like the batted down ball that could have been a easy interception for the Cornerback. Then there was the "turnover" where UND blocked the punt. I wouldn't say turnovers lost the game.
-
Go read all the discussion on it here. You're a little late to the show.
-
I noticed a couple very nice throws that Studsrud doesn't seem to make (Bartles also had a really bad throw...probably a timing/miscommunication issue). But Studsrud is the runner that the coaches seem want the offense to be. The Defense lost the game for us on Saturday. (or injuries lost the game).
-
"Noise to content ratio" is pretty obvious here.
-
You do know that UND officials in March addressed concerns about a budget shortfall of up to $29 Million thanks to a change in state funding formula when they went to speak at the states senate appropriations committee. It hit the papers months ago. This isn't some secret that you thought it was that nobody was reporting.
-
You noticed that too. So calm he acted like every play was a dead ball.
-
That's the problem. You hear oh bad run d especially on the outside. What does Und do. They try to exploit weakness they noticed. What does isu do, worked on fixing a weakness everyones noticed. Isu figured out you can't run against Und. They said OK fine. And picked apart the Und d all day long.
-
Double cover the receivers!!
