Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

The Sicatoka

Moderators
  • Posts

    37,205
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    580

Everything posted by The Sicatoka

  1. I believe UND is using the first prong test to comply with Title IX: "Provide athletic participation opportunities that are substantially proportionate to the undergraduate enrollment."
  2. FYP. Rumors that the "rancher" used a CCM Ultra Tacks left-handed stick can not be confirmed at this writing. Wait. My report is from Cincinnati.
  3. Wolverines? Dead.
  4. Mentioning new logo, wordmarks, etc ... < tapping foot > < glancing down at watch >
  5. Another forward beyond what you list (and that assumes keeping Schmaltz).
  6. I'm wondering the same things about the defense situation. Say we have the "pass the Maalox!" situation: Bring in Bowen as a defenseman; and need two forwards. The 97s are Cakebreak and Keane. Cakebread is an enigma; Keane was less than awe-inspiring in his USHL time. To me the best case is keep Schmaltz, bring Bowen as a forward, and trust that Bast is ready.
  7. At forward I'm thinking Jost, Hoff, Yon, Smith, and Bowen. That's five to replace the departing five. (I'm hoping Schmaltz stays.) At defense, Poolman and Johnson. I'd love to say Bast, but I'm not sure because he missed most of last season. But, if those are the incomings that would bring in all the 95 and 96 DOBs in the pipeline plus Jost.
  8. I don't see Mattson coming straight from HS.
  9. I've heard something similar to that recently somewhere ...
  10. I'm seeing this consistent theme. Please explain to me what is behind your statements. Does UND not have to follow Title IX (Federal law). I want to find out what you know about this and what the concern is. Otherwise it just seems to be generalized complaining about a law (that I'll plainly admit I have some issues with). I'm looking for an open, honest answer about what the issues and concerns are, not just "women's hockey is too expensive".
  11. No kidding. That coach knows a precedent could be set. He's worried for his program (and job).
  12. Who you pick is who you have for four rounds is why a lot of folks were skeptical of DaveK's roster.
  13. Welcome to the InterWebs.
  14. Uh ... yeah. You pick based on who you think will generate point throughout the entire four rounds. If you didn't ...
  15. Rather than make a statement that any hockey fan here knows to be correct (and thus shakes their head at you), why don't you go look at a schedule and educate yourself a little more about hockey?
  16. That's so cute! You actually believe that outdated notion.
  17. http://education.und.edu/counseling-psychology-and-community-services/recreation-tourism/
  18. This will churn on the "good old days" crowd: UND went 13 years in the good old days without a Championship. Just 3 years of the new era ... RAISE IT.
  19. When you're trying to figure out who's coming in, don't forget about the player's DOB.
  20. Television option being Midco, or part of the B1G, or maybe FSN. That's crazy. Crazy good!
  21. Midco went after NDSU MBB in it's latest deal. I figured that was to get more Fargo market share. I wonder if Midco did that for other reasons, like what is referenced here. What would make Midco nervous? Could Fox Sports North be looking at taking a run at UND hockey filling the role Minnesota hockey used to fill for them. That would require thinking outside the box for UND.
  22. Be careful using the Herald as a guide. They supported dropping the old nickname. You don't know their motives for publishing that.
  23. Again you confuse the two of us.
  24. Stand by for crazy scenarios: Add ASU/MSU-Mankato; Subtract Miami/WMU. Interesting ... Add ASU; Subtract UND (to B1G) Add ASU/MSU-Mankato/BGSU; Subtract UND (to B1G)
×
×
  • Create New...