Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, MoSiouxFan said:

Maybe he's injured, but with 7 minutes to play and Wake Forest leading 38-10, Wake has used 4 running backs and none of them is named SS.

Not good- UND’s current running backs are better, don’t even need SS back here

Posted
57 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

Not good- UND’s current running backs are better, don’t even need SS back here

Hope you're right.  I'm hopeful; we will know more after the next three weeks, including tomorrow.  We certainly have the OLine to enable our RB's to excel.

Posted
On 9/3/2026 at 9:02 PM, MoSiouxFan said:

Maybe he's injured, but with 7 minutes to play and Wake Forest leading 38-10, Wake has used 4 running backs and none of them is named SS.

Who is 'SS'?

  • Upvote 1
Posted
21 hours ago, The Sicatoka said:

FCS budgets

Loop

These stats are always interesting to see but should be taken with at least a partial grain of salt.  The numbers reported here, which I think come from Knight-Newhouse, don't exactly reconcile with publicly available data.  SDSU's football spending reported to the SDBOR, isn't quite as high as reported here, although a lot of the data matches up.  I think, in our case, some of the facility debt service is allocated to FB for these reports. 

MSU's budget took a big jump - $5m year over year, without revenues and expenditures really changing for the department as a whole.  

Here's a direct link to UND's report: https://knightnewhousedata.org/fcs/university-north-dakota

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...