CoteauRinkRat Posted November 14, 2003 Share Posted November 14, 2003 UND will have a couple of games where there power play goes 4-6 or 5-6 and their numbers will rise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCM Posted November 14, 2003 Share Posted November 14, 2003 Rumor has it Schmidtdoggydog bases his whole existance on Redwing77. We all do. We just don't like to admit it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwing77 Posted November 14, 2003 Share Posted November 14, 2003 We all do. We just don't like to admit it. Now if only the Administrator would say that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jk Posted November 21, 2003 Author Share Posted November 21, 2003 This is now updated through 9 games. This is how UND's and its opponents' scoring breaks down this year (UND's scoring listed first): 5x3 1-0 (When UND has the 5x3 advantage, it has outscored its opponent 1-0.) 5x4 2-2 5x5 34-10 4x4 5-0 4x5 0-8 3x5 0-1 6x5 1-0 * * Not sure where to include this so I'll put it in its own category for now. This is an extra-attacker goal, where UND pulled their goalie due to a delayed penalty call on the opponent. Denver has apparently scored fewer than half its goals at even strength. They have six(!) shorties this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schmidtdoggydog Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 Seeing this reminds of the last time you posted related data, it elicited quite a response from at least one gopher fan. And that got me thinking that I don't recall this board ever being so devoid of comments from the Gopher "faithful." Although I like most of those guys, the peace and quiet is kind of nice. I guess a 2-7-1 start will do that to some fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoteauRinkRat Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 And that got me thinking that I don't recall this board ever being so devoid of comments from the Gopher "faithful." Although I like most of those guys, the peace and quiet is kind of nice. I guess a 2-7-1 start will do that to some fans. I was thinking the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinnesotaNorthStar Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 With a school like UND having a top notch aviation school attached, you'd think that this question wouldn't rise up, but then again, all aviation classes are about where they are going to fly this weekend and the location of the next party And, according to http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/ConfigAeroDesignOpt.pdf , it should be swept 45 - 70 degrees. Seems high, but there you go. Sheesh. Sometimes I wonder if you guys can even function without me Actually it's only half right....it's 60 degrees, any less than that and theres too much wave drag to go above Mach 2. So , yes, we can function without you...Mr. A&P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwing77 Posted November 22, 2003 Share Posted November 22, 2003 Actually it's only half right....it's 60 degrees, any less than that and theres too much wave drag to go above Mach 2. So , yes, we can function without you...Mr. A&P Half right? Since when was 60 degrees outside of 45-70 degrees? Darn pilots. Our jobs wouldn't be half as tough if pilots weren't involved! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinnesotaNorthStar Posted November 22, 2003 Share Posted November 22, 2003 Less than 60 degrees will not get you to Mach 2. 45 will get you supersonic (which starts around Mach 1.3...I will not bore you with why), but to get to Mach 2...it's gotta be 60. The Concorde's wing sweep is about 70. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jk Posted November 24, 2003 Author Share Posted November 24, 2003 This is now updated through 11 games. This is how UND's and its opponents' scoring breaks down this year (UND's scoring listed first): 5x3 2-0 (When UND has the 5x3 advantage, it has outscored its opponent 1-0.) 5x4 3-2 5x5 44-13 4x4 6-0 4x5 1-9 3x5 0-1 6x5 1-0 (extra attacker goal) Total 57-25 Still rolling at even-strength. Special teams comparison is coming along, with the first shortie on the board. BONUS number fun: Of Brady Murray's five goals to date, three have been scored very early in a period. It appears that Brady is a little more ready to go than his opponents: 0:13 of the first, Yale 1:07 of the third, MN 0:25 of the third, Denver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoteauRinkRat Posted November 24, 2003 Share Posted November 24, 2003 Of Brady Murray's five goals to date, three have been scored very early in a period. It appears that Brady is a little more ready to go than his opponents: 0:13 of the first, Yale 1:07 of the third, MN 0:25 of the third, Denver Great stat, looks like Murray comes out looking for a goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jk Posted December 21, 2003 Author Share Posted December 21, 2003 This is now updated through 13 games. This is how UND's and its opponents' scoring breaks down this year (UND's scoring listed first): 5x3 2-0 (When UND has the 5x3 advantage, it has outscored its opponent 2-0.) 5x4 5-2 5x5 51-19 4x4 6-0 4x5 2-10 3x5 0-1 6x5 1-0 (extra attacker goal) 5x6 1-0 (empty net goal) Total 68-32 Friday night marks the first game of the year where the opponent outscored the Sioux even-strength, by a 4-3 margin. UND's SHG and PPG accounted for the 5-4 final score. BONUS fun: When UND takes to the ice to play in its holiday tourney, it will have played just two games in the preceding 34 days. It'll be like starting the season all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprig Posted December 21, 2003 Share Posted December 21, 2003 BONUS fun: When UND takes to the ice to play in its holiday tourney, it will have played just two games in the preceding 34 days. It'll be like starting the season all over again. From a fan's perspective, it feels like waiting for a new season, also. Sioux looked a bit rusty, especially defensively, on Friday against Duluth. Lots of odd man situations in the Sioux end that the Dogs didn't take advantage of. Hope they don't look sloppy at SCSU, although they don't have the offensive firepower that Duluth does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodakvindy Posted December 21, 2003 Share Posted December 21, 2003 I guess that says how weak the EZAC is. I don't think Cornell is even that good. Can anyone think of the last time an EZAC team actually beat UND. I can't remember it in the past 10 years. UND has won 27 or 28 straight against ECAC teams. Included in that streak are wins over every team in the conference except Union, Harvard and Colgate. The last loss came in the 84-85 season when the Sioux split a series with RPI. That RPI team was one of the best clubs in ECAC history, going 35-2-1 and eventually winning the NCAA title. Oh, and it featured one Adam Oates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jk Posted December 21, 2003 Author Share Posted December 21, 2003 UND has won 27 or 28 straight against ECAC teams. Included in that streak are wins over every team in the conference except Union, Harvard and Colgate. The last loss came in the 84-85 season when the Sioux split a series with RPI. That RPI team was one of the best clubs in ECAC history, going 35-2-1 and eventually winning the NCAA title. Oh, and it featured one Adam Oates. And RPI's last loss that year came at the Winter Sports Center, in overtime, on Thanksgiving weekend, to UND. Chris Jensen lunged for a rebound, knocking the puck in while airborn, in the OT. I can still picture him landing on the ice, fully horizontal, and bouncing from his stomach back to his feet in one motion to celebrate. That great RPI team beat a great UMD team in the national semifinals in multiple overtimes before beating Chris Terrerri's Providence team in the finals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UMDDogz Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 That great RPI team beat a great UMD team in the national semifinals in multiple overtimes before beating Chris Terrerri's Providence team in the finals. You just HAD to remind everyone, didn't you. I don't know what was the deal with UMD and multi-OT games. They lost the '84 NC game to Bowling Green in 4 OT's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jk Posted January 2, 2004 Author Share Posted January 2, 2004 This is now updated through 15 games. This is how UND's and its opponents' scoring breaks down this year (UND's scoring listed first): 5x3 2-0 (When UND has the 5x3 advantage, it has outscored its opponent 2-0.) 5x4 5-2 5x5 60-22 4x4 7-0 4x5 2-10 3x5 0-1 6x5 1-0 (extra attacker goal) 5x6 2-0 (empty net goal) Total 79-35 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoteauRinkRat Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Unbelieveable numbers at even strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southpaw Posted January 10, 2004 Share Posted January 10, 2004 With the powerplay clicking for at least one night (4 of 7), Brandon Bochenski is now the WCHA leader in powerplay goals with 6 in 11 games. Just think if the PP clicks in, how unstoppable this team will be. They averaged 5+ goals a game with a 0.9% PP going into last night. Teams won't be able to hold as much, because they would risk getting a penalty and having goals scored on them. Right now, that has been something they can do without too much damage. Edit: We are ranked 4th in the WCHA on the PP with 19.4% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UMDDogz Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 that's not what collegehockey.com says. Maybe you are only counting WCHA games...but overall your PP is at 12%. UMD 2nd in PP at 24.6%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 that's not what collegehockey.com says. Maybe you are only counting WCHA games...but overall your PP is at 12%. UMD 2nd in PP at 24.6%. Hey UMDaugz, who care what what UMDs percentage on the power play is this is a UND sight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UMDDogz Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 This is a college hockey site...and a much better one than any other I have found. There is not as much flaming or personal attacks. People just want to talk hockey here, and that is cool. I am a Bulldogs fan, you are a Sioux fans. We both respect each other and enjoy talking hockey together, so what does it matter whose "sight" it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jk Posted January 12, 2004 Author Share Posted January 12, 2004 This is now updated through 19 games. This is how UND's and its opponents' scoring breaks down this year (UND's scoring listed first): 5x3 3-0 (When UND has the 5x3 advantage, it has outscored its opponent 3-0.) 5x4 9-3 5x5 69-28 4x4 7-0 4x5 2-12 3x5 0-1 6x5 1-0 (extra attacker goal) 5x6 3-0 (empty net goal) Total 94-44 I'm going to go on record with my opinion that the PP is improving, even though the numbers don't yet show it much. At least it's not the train wreck to watch that it was earlier in the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UMDDogz Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 The Sioux really seem to dominate 4X4. Too bad the NCAA OT's aren't played that way! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoteauRinkRat Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 The PP has looked a lot better over the past couple of weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.