SiouxBoys

LETS GOOOOOO

Yeah, what the hell was he thinking?

I sure have heard of those guys. Q doesn't have their skill set at all. Thanks for playing, though!

You realize those runs have been between the tackles, right? You act like Q is the second coming of Vick. Where have you been?

Have you ever thought to yourself why?

Red Wilson is slippery

Kauppinen lowering the shoulder instead of wrapping up isn't ideal.

Anybody with an IQ above 50 doesn't see what you see.

Bo is a player.

Wonder how many times their tackle's going to jump early before a flag is finally thrown.

Don't you dare bring logic into this. Q would have for sure been able to launch it 60 yards to our fast burners.

McNaboe

Thanks for your input. Feel free to never post again.

Dude, just shut up.

Yeah, that's not the part of your post I highlighted. I was more talking about the part where anybody wearing Hawks gear must be a new fan. It goes together with the idea that anybody who has been able to embrace the Hawks name, just isn't as passionate as the Sioux Forever crowd.

@stoneySIOUX The only point I'm making is that between the "Sioux Forever" crowd and the "Hawks Only" crowd, one group does way more damage to the University than the other. I'll ask one last question and then I'll leave this stupid, dead horse beating thread. Do you think there is a better chance of somebody getting booed wearing a Hawks logo at the Ralph or wearing a Sioux head at the Alerus? I have been on the receiving end of one of these scenarios, but not the other. Also, @stoneySIOUX I don't have a problem with you at all. My problem more so lies with the poster I quoted here.

Who exactly is in the "Hawks Only" group? I consider myself a Fighting Hawks fan but have absolutely no problem with anybody who chooses to wear Fighting Sioux stuff, as do many other people in this thread. The only problem I see if the "Sioux Forever" crowd who openly oppose the Hawks name. You'll find that Bison and Gopher fans feel the same way about the Hawks name as the "Sioux Forever" crowd. I'd argue one of these two groups does a whole hell of a lot more damage than the other.

How has anything @ChrisUND1 said hurting our university?

I mean, this thread is titled "Former Players" so technically no posts should have anything to do with this team.

Putting him in in that save opportunity right there tells me this is the plan. Dude's stuff is electric.

Okay, but a forward coming in at 18 years old has happened quite a few times over the years. It's really not that rare.

What do you mean by this?

Oddly this last year we had a top 1 and a bottom 11.

He's going to be drafted this summer but he's not even close to being good enough to play here next year? We have four forwards returning who had 20 points or more. Four of them.

If the only way to have him in two years is taking him now, then yes, you take him now.