SiouxBoys

Hahaha nothing quite like an "apology" where you start playing the victim. If the fans behind the bench were really that bad, why would you leave Graham on the sideline and not just send him to the locker room? What a fucking idiot.

It means you're a glass half empty kind of person. Everything you say (which you say a lot, even though it's typically the same 2-3 sentences every single time) needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

If a Missouri Valley team doesn't get in at 7-4, it's more of an indictment on the conference than the team itself.

And we were very quickly informed that having 4 FCS losses was more important than 6 wins and 1 FBS win (quality loss argument).

Nah, you just don't know the rules nearly as much as you think you do.

Hahahaha remember that time you claimed the UND goal against QU was offside, and it wasn't? That was so much fun, wasn't it Mr. Amateur?

Nah it's not just you. But don't let that flatter you, a lot of people here aren't the brightest.

Haven't seen a team this much better than their opponent since last night.

FYP

Careful, we're all amateurs compared to him.

10-27-19 on the ice for the goal. Maybe we can finally stop considering them a shutdown line.

2019. In 2016 we won in Bozeman 17-15.

They are absolutely referring to the University of North Dakota. By the way, I'm trying to sell this bridge, you interested?

If you're UNI or Montana, probably seeded around 5th with an 8-3 record. UND? We'd be one of the last four in...

Yeah it does. I hear ya on not liking them, but we want the nchc to be as strong as possible.

I don't see how conference opponents losing non-conference games is a positive.

Definitely not a fan RP and his antics, but he's a dang good coach.

Sounds like you're tired of Rand then. Or are we still thinking it's some big conspiracy?

Except Judd didn't play the puck across the line. He pushed it into the zone and then didn't touch it again until Jamer had tagged up. You're genuinely making up a scenario in your head and then claiming to be right. Maybe hockey isn't for you.

Pretty much the exact same play.

I'm well aware of what the rule is. The problem is you're completely wrong. Judd pushes the puck into the zone, never touching it before players tag up. Their player then slices the puck up in the air, it hits the shaft of Judd's stick. Judd has both his feet outside the zone when this happens, as does the only player (Jamernik) who was offsides originally. This play is literally no different than dumping in when offside, tagging up, and then playing.

Nope you're wrong. The puck entered the zone when UND was offside but was not played until all players had left the zone.

The acting like it only happens to UND is overplayed and annoying. Not a whole lot you can do when the coach uses his challenge.

It was a coach's challenge, they've now lost their timeout. Calm down Karen.

Momentum won't overcome 4 goals on 11 shots.