Siouxphan27

no kidding! we're shooting horribly so far from everywhere. could be running away with it if we were shooting well.

rather ugly game. Bradley is definitely as advertised. looks like there's opportunities to pound it inside if our bigs can finish. i wish hoops44 would give us some insight on the coaching thus far.

I like that look; even if it was without the 4 feathers. the beak could be modified some to look more hawk-like.

Next you should do a list of his program defining 10 Most Memorable Wins... oh wait, never mind...

no, you didn't. please keep posting. your level of intelligence really shone through with that previous post of yours. I enjoy the entertainment you provide.

you really have a way with words. Thanks for taking a break as lead negotiator for peace with ISIS to grace us with your unbiased, eloquent words of peaceful wizdumb.

wow it's like the da Vinci code of logos!

finally, some common sense from nd #1 sufan.

Paint stick was dirty.

What's really unfortunate is you didn't graduate from cow college in 2011. If you had, we wouldn't have your trolling posts doubling up with bisonalumni2011 posts.

It looks like i'm standing directly over a can of green paint, and I just poured a little white in there and made one swish with the paint stick.

Don't you have some sheep to shear? Give it a rest. UND was playing great football at the end of the year. But since you're not a fan, you would have no idea. Quit trolling and start shearing.

I stay there every night and twice on Sundays!

~The More You Know~

actually, yes I can. If you look at the prediction threads, I predicted UND's score exactly right against UNC. I followed that up by predicting both teams scores correctly 45-21, for the season finale against Cal Poly. any other questions you may have concerning scores and spreads, I'd be happy to answer for you. (For a fee)

If they aren't great as you said, why should they get in over a team with a better record, an FBS win, and a better performance against a common opponent? the way WIU looks against Dayton, UND would score 45 on WIU and win by a few TDs.

good point. Although the Bi- son fans posting here wouldn't agree; we would've needed at least 8 wins; maybe 12, to be playoff worthy.

Yes, tell us more about how great WIU is.....maybe some in depth detail about that dominating first half against Dayton....

#qualitylosses

wow, thanks. I don't know how you figured that out. you're either onto something or you're on something. I would mention I don't think hawks have bottom beaks that protrude like that.... but being the whole thing is so abstract i'll assume that's just the mushrooms talking.

so is the small black dot the eye? if so, is the black part to the left of the eye the beak, and the black part to the right of the eye is?? did Picasso draw this?

nd1sufan.... is that short for North Dakota's #1 Sioux fan? You and the entire ndsu class of 2011 sure have a knack for choosing usernames.

I guess we need to keep in mind the old adage we all learned as kids... "It's not whether you win or lose; it's the quality of your losses."

I'm fairly confident that 8 is greater than 7. So at your command, yes, I will stop.

my opinion is 7 wins, and we were kept out. 8 wins and we wouldn't be having this conversation on why we were left out. I'm not close to the team so can't comment on the intangibles regarding ndsu. But the collapses in Weber and ISU still happened despite whatever growth happened at ndsu. Bartels didn't play D in those games.....would've been nice if Arnell could have.