Bidago

17-13 und in a close one

I thought that was kinda odd too. the coined fraise a "a few divas" seems to have replaced the saying "toe to toe"

Quite witty

Freud?

17-13 und over sac state in a close one

some one need to explain what the figure of speech " toe to toe" actually means

anyone, anyone? voo doo? lol

I agree that molberg looked better overall yesterday. I don't see the game by game improvement you are talking about. He had a bad performance last week vs a week Idaho defense and continues to have critical judgement breakdows

in once sense, most everyone agrees. so, back to my question. how do we get eggs without a chicken?

look at the bright side of things, we are tied for 1st in the big sky when it comes to(4th down conversion %)

what worked(?) for us last weekend and what EW's defense will allow us to do are separate issues. jmho

so what came first, the chicken or the egg? have to win to get recruits, have to have good recruits to win. internal ability to develop good players into a defined, organized, disciplined program seems to be a possible missing link?

I didn't see much of Bradley but if that performance was better, he really must have sucked. I don't know what else und can do?

is this game televised, if so where can I watch

do we typically have a few commits at this time of year?

qb play does not equal the hype coming into season or ability of receiving core. "best recruit in 20 yrs?", "best receiving core in fcs?" 83 total passing yards, maybe I just expected more out of the one category that was to be the automatic shining light for und

take the valpo game out of the equation and the numbers for the qb position as a whole are dismal at best. can the oc get the ball into the hands of the stated "best receiving core in fcs" he/qb's must find a way.

with the current state of affairs, I think und should get our house in order before we try take on the bison. the series has to start some time, if they are gonna play. someone will win the first game. I would just as soon it not be by 75 points.

so, Donald is a duck. mickey is a mouse. Pluto is a dog. what's goofy?........................................this thread is goofy!

who will muss name as starter today. my guess in molberg,

be humble on the way to proud, rather than proud on the way to being humbled.

if molberg is the starter again, which he should be. he deserves as much preparation as possible to prepare for msu. Is he still spitting reps with bartels in practice this week?

Bradley would have been the number 2. al least for the start. Hanson was only out a couple games. I agree that Bradley wouldn't have lasted long, but he would've made it a couple games until Hanson came back. Hendrickson had a great run when he had the chance to. I just don't think he would've gotten the chance if Bradley was there. JMHO anyway, the important thing now is to prepare for the future. I am not versed to know how much the practices create a "game-like" situations for qb's. they wont be the first or the last redshirt fr to get a starting spot. I am just interested to see how they can handle the intangible aspect of r"eal live" game management.

I would agree with the qb statement. tho it was no masterful manipulation by the coaching staff. Hanson was a drop-in gift. Hendrickson would have never taken a snap if Bradley stuck around. our wr core didn't hurt either. I think the freshman qb's looked ok in the spring game. it was just that, a spring game. the big sky hit squads wont be as easy on them. lets hope the ol can protect them and one of them will step up to handle the pressure. 7 wins this season would be a victory to me!