Bidago

17-`14, und wins a close one

that really should NOT be to much to ask for and it DOES fall all the coaches - without a doubt

I here what you are saying, but something just doesn't feel right about mussman. as long as he controls playing time, he will get the token respect from some of those kids. other than that, I appears to me he doesn't have the respect of the team. respect of the team has very little to do with how long it takes to establish yourself in a conference. apples/oranges

I bet muss and the boys partied like rock stars after the win on saturday

Any idea on attendance. I am guessing 4k

17-13 und in a close one

what is going to be easier? teaching molberg to think, or teaching bartels to run?

thank you

I did not see muss;s post game press conference. although I can imagine what he said. "IF we would have gotten that one _____, and IF that one play when the ref called_____, IF ____ catch would've been called complete, and IF we would've wrapped up when ____ ran for that score, ........" it's the same every week. Every team could play the IF game in a win or a loss. PSU's coach could've said in his pressor. IF we would have turned those three missed field goals into td's and IF we wouldn't have thrown an int on the 1 yard line, we would have blown out und. my dad didn't believe in IF's, when I would use an IF, he would reply with a sarcastic tone, "IF the dog wouldn't have stopped to take a sh*#, he would've caught the rabbit!

Lol

Keep on coaching muss.......

muss appears reluctant to shake things up. keeps same game plan, personnel yet somehow expects different results. interesting strategy. to answer your question, no. a win would be great for the program, if what we all keep saying over and over and over wont change with one win.

so if the game is on FSN, can it be watched on Channel 27 midco, how about direct TV channel?

after 111 pages of "fire muss" it all comes down to Craig Bohl;s sex life. if only we could have foreseen how important that was to und football coaching concerns whooda thunk?

even if bartlels plays, I still predict molberg gets to his season average 2 int's 1 TD.

molberg hold the record for int's to td's ratio...lol, sorry, I had to

arguably the best player to ever wear the green/white was from Carrington ND!

I would agree with that. most of the recruiting comes down to sheer population numbers, which ND doesn't have much of. period. the larger the pond, the bigger the fish

I am from nd, so I have to call you out on the 100x better statement. I think Grafton plays teams like shanley, wahpeton, and then down from there. dl has Thief river falls, Crookston, Perham, etc, etdc. better-yes, 100x-doubtful

it is painfully obvious that und got caught with a short depth chart at qb. it is possible and probably likely that Bartles currently has a better understanding, tho he is slower. you never know until you try something/somebody else. the qb battle was reported to be razor close. friend said, he wouldn't be afraid to play any of the freshman. what if?, what if?

was there an epic battle between molberg and bartels in spring/fall camp? there must have been as Bartels started the first few games. were the coaching staff's assessments so far off? Molberg is the obvious choice when you look at his stature and athletic ability and in the long run, he is probably still the strongest candidate. all things being equal, what is between the ears is the more important part of qb's make up. not one of the teams that have defeated us this year have had a 6'3" 235 lb qb.

17-13 und wins a close one

you are missing the point I am trying to make. I don't think that he should rotate the two. try something new. I am not a huge Batles fan by any stretch of the imagination. put the other kid in, I don't care. I am quite confident that molbergs numbers will be 2 int's 1 td after the next game. the only rhythm we have now is we throw 2 int's/game.

he got blasted because many fans thought Hendrickson was doing a great job, because he was. choosing between two successful qb's is a completely different scenario than signing up ahead of time for 2 int's and 1 td

I am not a big fan of using multiple qb's. I was one of the people who wanted muss to start molberg, at the time, I think he earned it. I also agree that the protection has been sub-par. Bartels had a bad streak and rightfully got replaced. but is he so bad now that he cant give us a second look while the starter throws 2 iht's/td over the last 5 games? what happened to the "epic battle" that played out during spring/fall camp? Freund is on record stating that all 3 rfr were capable at playing at a high level. we HAD the best receiving core it FCS? a quick thinking, mobile quarterback is everyone's dream. some kids are quick thinking, some are mobile, some are both or neither. Molberg is obviously quicker than Bartles, but what has it gotten us. he scrambles to throw more int's we would be better of with sacks. I would like to see muss shake it up at the qb position the next few games. I don't know what he promised molberg when recruiting him, but it might cost him his job. if bartels goes is and cant get it done, put the other guy in. if he doesn't work, put molberg back in. in a goofy way, it worked for psu. muss doesn't shake it up enough. he has done the same at other positions, i.e. rb, lb, ol etc. if you keep doing what you've always done, you will get what you've always got! when he starts molberg next game, my grediction is 2 int's 1td. if we are satisfied with that, then so be it.