I prefer to predict on what could happen based on potential. I'm optimistic on most things in life. I never claim that my predictions aren't homer pics. I'm not sure what my record is on predictions but I'm pretty sure I almost always predict a win. I'm sure my record sucks. Do I care? No, I don't take those very seriously.
I've been on the record that I think UND needs to change things up so it's not like I'm trying to go down with the ship.
If I suggest something is a fact it's because I know something that would lead to that. Go back and check my track record on those things.
As far as siouxnation goes I don't care if a post is 99% dead on, if that 1% is some serious accusation with no proof that is not held up by anyone then it's a problem.
Why is my credibility in question for wanting a level playing field in these arguments?