UNDBIZ

It's called sarcasm.

I'd hope, for his sake, it's a very soft commitment. Not sure why you'd want to go someplace you aren't valued enough to keep a walk-on offer open for.

I don't remember ever calling you out on your weekly ndsu posts prior to now. Also, viewing a bunch of terrible logos could be good for fostering acceptance of the new hawk logo. Here's a terrible mascot: I've decided that as a moderator, I'm only going to censor your moo u posts in the future. Sorry.

Darell, you bring them up out of left field significantly more often than any other single poster on this board. It is what it is.

I wonder if he's the one Schwenzfeier tweeted about. I'd have guessed it was the new USD coaching staff.

So Hagerott didn't tell the campuses to avoid permanent solutions. Understood. Petty arguments aside (I'll admit we were both wrong/misleading on certain items), permanent solutions are needed. I think everyone is beginning to recognize that now (some recognized it earlier). Schafer believes in planning ahead and preparing for the funding cuts now. I don't think he's wrong for that, as mcfeely implies in his conspiratorial rant (which I can only assume must've been alcohol/drug-infused).

Now, from the memo: I'm sure it must say avoid permanent solutions in there someplace.

You have proof of that, right? Because I'm sitting here looking at Hagerott's guidelines, and they don't say that at all. Pretty much the opposite.

I wouldn't go that far, he does have a head start though. There also seems to have been a slight shift in culture at UND, where departments are now looking to save money even when they aren't being specifically asked to.

Had he came to UND, the flopping and whining would've been coached out of his game. UND could've saved the NHL players and fans some headaches.

The campuses had 2 weeks to identify the line items to cut from, seeing as they only have 2 lines, that wasn't real difficult or involved. The only decision was whether to cut building maintenance or something else. I'm also looking at the guidelines he sent out right now, and although they do not specifically state to make deep ongoing cuts, they certainly don't say the opposite. Accelerate ongoing efficiency efforts, examine academic courses, and evaluate faculty course loads certainly sound like items that may have an ongoing effect on the budget to me, and go figure, they also sound like what UND did. UND also used the budget issues as an excuse to nix programs that have been on the chopping block for a decade. As for the rest, I've never said UND didn't have a steeper hill to climb from the start due to Kelley's mismanagement.

Per the twitter, Bowling Green game will be on espn3.

Title IX is the only reason.

Haha, that works for me.

K, I just didn't see him really breaking away on most plays and on one the kicker almost caught him from behind so I had some doubts. We do need another smaller, quick, slot receiver though.

No, women's hockey is not part of the hockey world. I'd say the odds are pretty even at this point.

Hmm, not tall and doesn't appear to have blazing speed either. What do you see there? Quickness?

Are you going to do this every time after somebody has a post referencing them?

I was under the impression that was his job.

Please refrain from posting disgusting images here.

The Chancellor directed the campuses to first consider ongoing cuts, rather than one-time. McFeely knows nothing.

I think he was just confirming that Archy was wrong any way you look at it.

I asked the same thing. I'm curious if he's referring to overall athletics budget or even overall school budget, in which case he's still wrong.

Or he "plans" to graduate in 4 years.... Not uncommon for kids to list 4 years out as their expected graduating class year.

So UND's budget is probably higher but still the same as Tech's or MnSU's?