InHeavenThereIsNoBeer

About 30 miles from gf and it is slick, been a long trek from minneapolis but we're not going to be denied!

This would be a great draw for the Sioux. Unfortunately, there's still quite a bit of hockey to play before the brackets are set.

Anyone looking to sell ticket packages? I am looking to get 4 of them together if possible but it not would possibly buy 2 sets of 2. Thanks!

More importantly, they moved up to 5 in the pairwise after Sunday's Denver beat UAA, although I'm not sure how or why.

Just posted a question about this on the Mtech thread, so would UND play in the afternoon or at night on Thursday in this scenario? And if they beat MSU, they would play at night Friday against UM, correct?

A bit off topic but if the Sioux, Gophers, and SCSU win their 1st round game, which Thursday game(night or afternoon) and which Friday game will the Sioux play in? I would assume they would play the Gophers Friday night (assuming a win on thursday) because of the Minnesota rule playing at night and the Sioux would be the best seed with MN being the worst out of them and SCSU. Any help is appreciated!

Is anyone else getting an internal server error when trying to purchase the video feed or have any ideas how to fix? My CC has already been charged 3 times.

You could play the 'What If' game every year but it just sucks to think about. We could have Brock, Stefan Mateau, JT Miller, Kristo, Knight, and Grimaldi on the same college hockey team. Now that would be a ridiculous level of talent.

Did I accidentally sign on to GPL? How can such a definitive, black and white statement like this be made? I'm assuming you spoke with Hak and the team last night and they decided to hang it up and call it a season since they tied. Please step off the ledge and join us in reality.

Name the school that does not fit in out of these 5...

Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.

I would think University of Illinois could be an option, believe I've heard it mentioned somewhere.

Call me crazy but I'd like to see the exact same lines as in the 6-1 win over Denver.

Watching this again today and noticed at the 3:57 mark Chris Knowlton acts as a pylon for Danny Kristo's deke to start the 3 on 2 that leads to the Grimaldi goal...this line is good

Thanks for the video, that was great! This game was played at the Ralph, right? Just judging based on fan reactions and the score we hung on DU.

To this point, I actually do think that people will travel for this series. It's about 5 hours from Minneapolis and an easy drive through Iowa and I think it gives UND Colorado Alumni a chance to make a trip too. I'm not saying it will be like it was a couple weekends ago but I believe the turnout will still be solid.

You probably shouldn't be reading these message boads if you don't want to know what UND fans' opinion on the future of the WCHA tournament is. Obviously we don't have a dog in the fight, but that doesn't mean it can't be discussed/debated. "What a bunch of UND fans think" is going to be what you get here.

I'll take the over

I guess karma made it's way back around to Mr. Privitera.

Anyone remember Harvard's a few years back? That one was hilarious with the announcing. I think we beat them 10-1 in one of the games too and Zach Jones had a goal. UAA's is another that comes to mind as not being great but hey I'll take any webcast I can get to watch my team!

Hahaha

Glad I'm coming from Minneapolis and will hopefully be able to skirt around the storm going through Iowa. Drive safe everyone from ND.

No, perhaps you forgot. Your point above was that Blood received a game suspension because he broke the rules and Rau did not because he did not break the rules. Then you went on to infer that because Blood received the suspension and Rau did not, Blood is the only player to blame in the situation. As I said your premise for the argument is not "spot on". Dont' get me wrong, the premise was incorrect to begin with (because suspension does not equal blame) but the fact that your premise is not even true weakens your stance and your argument considerably.

So your entire premise is moot. Glad we got that cleared up.