jdub27

Honestly, I would think that isn't that far out of the ordinary. Per the article, teams send in a list of plays every week for review, but it usually is never made this public. But what better way to "prove" you aren't rigging the games than missing calls that benefit the team you have already decided is going to win. Brilliant!

Wait, what?? NFL tells Cowboys they missed seven penalties on Lions as well

I assume along with uniforms, the deal includes training clothes, travel clothes, coach's attire, etc?

From the "Not This $%!# Again" file: Anyone from Minot want to have a few words with their Representative?

Per Sioux Football Insider, UND will be wearing adidas gear next year. New home and away uniforms starting the upcoming season.

Friday - O'D Saturday - Drake

Unless they made it so expansion was possible and simple for the future, renovating for 18,000 at Memorial would be a colossal waste of money. I know that numbers right now are nowhere near that demand and having a half empty stadium doesn't look good but it would be a giant waste to spend that much money on that few of seats.

Yeah, I was just looking back at the 2014 Recruiting thread and it looked like there was a couple different versions of what might of happened.

I believe UND (Bubba's staff) did offer Parks out of high school last year.

Because it is a flat out insult to the people who a lot of work and their own free time into digging up information and actually putting names and solid information out there, sharing it for everyone. Throwing generalities with absolutely nothing concrete out there and then coming back after the fact and saying "I told you so" is just mindless clutter and all about "Look at me". There are quite a few people on here that actually have some very good insider info but for one reason or another can't make it public. That's fine but they aren't parading around pretending they do or don't know something. And if they do bring something up, they actually provide some sort of tidbit that can at least give a clue.

Glad we could clear up that your "excuse" is that a month later you don't have enough pull in the %GOBC to release even a hint. The world is shocked.

Inquiring minds are very curious who the mystery transfer is.

Georges was announced a whole month ago. That same day you claimed there were 2 more FBS transfers (RB and WR) coming but one might be iffy (and has supposedly backed out). The only other FBS transfer since then was Arrington, who in no way had been in contact with the staff the date of your claim, so there is no possible way that is who you were talking about. Who's the other transfer? It's either a RB or WR, per your claim. It's been a month, you can't divulge it yet? Not even a hint on the school or at least conference they might be coming from? At least something to prove that you aren't throwing stuff against a wall again? Simple questions.

You might be correct. But over the past couple years, I've heard a lot of things that NDSU supposedly wouldn't do with their schedule or what the supposed requirements were from NDSU fans and then watched the athletic department do something that doesn't follow that.

I won't argue that, but it I find it to be at least a little more credible than someone randomly claiming the opposite with absolutely nothing to back it up.

Simple questions. Why no answers?

The survey results say otherwise. Curious what your basing your statement off of?

Glancing at Freund's twitter, it would appear he's with Schmidt.

You said expect two more after Georges committed. And one was iffy (guessing it was the RB). So there should be one more. Five days after UAB disbanded their football team and before the UND coaches had even contacted anyone, you are claiming that Arrington was the other one?

So who's the other one then? Two more to come, one fell through? Was it the WR or the RB? A month later and the %GOBC won't let you at least mention what school the kid is coming from?

So far there are 2 FBS transfers. You claimed there would be two more after Georges. Are you claiming that Arrington was one of the FBS players that you "knew" about? Would be pretty impressive considering the staff hadn't been in contact with him when you made your original claim. Who's the other WR?

You realize that play was correctly called by the rules at the time correct? It was only originally ruled a fumble because that ensured they could review it as incomplete passes aren't reviewable (which is what the referees were taught to do). The Patroits were also on the other side of the exact same call earlier in the season. And also this little tidbit:

Well aware what the current price tag is. I'm talking about the estimates they had years ago when the nickname change was originally being debated I believe it included the process of coming up with a new one and implementation an changes across campus. It was (and will be) spendy.

He's the kid that just got the PWO from Oregon correct?

This. Can't remember the number, but it was big. Price tag is only going to grow once they come up with a name as well.