Wilbur

And Shep and Marco just tossed Union's best defenseman for a shoulder to shoulder hit.....wonder where we've seen that before....

99% of the time I come on here and someone has already put into perfect perspective what I really wanted to say. Half of the time its like, yeah, what he/she posted.... Anyways.....here we go..... Yale will outshoot Umass Lowell, but Lowell will win the game because they are just that impressive to watch, and very very well coached. SCSU will shut down Quinnipiac's top unit with Jensen on the ice, and that'll be it for Josh Siembida's former stomping grounds. Lowell-SCSU for the title.....Hmmm.....ohhh.....Lowell wins like 2-1. PS: Had a class with Josh and he showed up one time. Too bad for him it was an old ornery western civ guy that had been teaching since my dad was at UND......I believe Josh dropped the class.....later the university....

Marco and Shep calling the Quinnilmnopqrst....Unioin game. Lets see if they call obstruction. Edit: And they miss a blatant too many men on the ice penalty......yikes.

Two teams that could have been dead with other outcomes in conference tournaments are at the frozen four...... Hockey doesn't make sense.

St. Cloud a few good shifts from the frozen four. Good for them. I can root for them to win the national championship.

Thompson is a tremendous defenseman. Great skater, great hands. Will add a lot when he comes here. But if Forbort stays I think he's down in the junior hockey ranks for another season. If Forbort leaves, I wouldn't mind seeing him at UND next year.

After watching Lowell they are my pick. Good goaltending, very sound positional play in their own end, and they are opportunistic. Them vs. SCSU for the national championship would be fun to watch.

As a former history teacher I am absolutely appalled as to what has been posted. This is college hockey folks. This is a game. None of us are oppressed to the point where our lives are forever altered by what a hockey coach has done. The Buddhist Monk post is just unacceptable...... Unreal....just unreal.

Captains next year..... C-Simpson A-Forbort (If back) A-Pattyn A-Rodwell Possibles: Mark, Parks.....ummm.......

Four year role players. By the time it got to their senior years, those guys were the best line in college hockey. Think of what Knight and Kristo would have done with Nelson this year?

Okay, turn the page, open the door to the new year.... Goaltending: ~Set....But will probably bring in another guy to fill the Maris role. Gosh I'm going to miss Tate. Defense: ~Simpson will see a ton of minutes....a ton. And they've got some skilled guys coming back. This area has to get better. Absolutely has to get better. I think LaDue will impress people next season, I believe he's still on track to come to UND next year. We'll miss that big physical defenseman though. Losing Mac is tough. Offense: ~Rocco needs to score. He's the best player coming back. I think there is some promise with Drake, Mark, St. Clair, Gaarder, Parks, and Wade Murphy is a kid that I think will contribute. Unfortunately Rowney didn't have enough of an impact year to be really missed. Wish I could say differently. Just a guess as to what line combos could look like: Drake-Rocco-Parks Murphy-Mark-Mitch St. Clair-Pattyn-Gaarder Rodwell-Chyzyk-Senkbeil....I dunno..... What we are really going to miss is Corban Knight winning a ton of faceoffs....thats for darn sure.

See, and I've heard the same thing as you in regards to Eades I believe. Obviously there is no place on a message board for rumors and hearsay, but what I've heard makes me understand as to why Mr. Eades is coaching elsewhere.

Thoughts on the hockey game today, after my cooling off period: ~First of all give credit to Yale. They won the game, and to say that UND laid down wouldn't be 100% honest. Yale earned that win. ~Inconsistency......just all year.....especially in this game......In all of Hak's years I've never seen a team like this one....no real identity. ~Clark gave the team very good goaltending. It didn't matter if Zane was in today, it would've been the same. ~Seemed like we got a bit behind the 8 ball with the X's and O's. Yale just out schemed us, and we couldn't break out or establish anything on the forecheck. ~I'm not going to throw guys name by name under the proverbial bus, but we had some guys that had to put the puck away that didn't. There were guys that had extremely below average years for what we expected of them, and unfortunately it cost this team dearly. It was the same thing in this game today. ~Penalties 200 feet away from our net.....yikes. I've always been a Hak backer, and I feel as if I'm falling off that fence a little bit. It's just a game right? Right?

Thank you so much seniors. Although you won't walk away with your ultimate goal it was truly a pleasure watching you play for our favorite team. Best of luck in whatever you do, and remember that once a Fighting Sioux, always a Fighting Sioux.

The right team won the game. Had North Dakota won it would have been a travesty for Yale.

Thats a goal, and its 3-1. The right team is going to win this hockey game.

Gleason on the ice for both goals.

Good start. Get on here fellas.

Well, here is my third period Sermon: Find a way. Whatever it takes. Find a way.

I like how the ESPNU guys are kind of making it seem like Yale is lucky to be only down 1-0......yet they have held the edge in play.

I don't feel bad about those posts because the way that this team is playing they haven't deserved those goals. Seemed like Yale may have lost their legs a bit there. UND has to go to work this period. Gleason shouldn't play much....he can't give the puck away in those spots.

End of two. The good news is we're playing like absolute dog crap outside of some shifts and we have a lead.....does not make sense this game.

Clark Saunders has been good.....ohh he's been good.

There we go.....finally some good shifts.....finally some good shifts.....

Good shift finally.